articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/230125-economic-research-u-s-business-cycle-barometer-constrained-by-tight-monetary-policy-and-global-slowdown-12610540 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: U.S. Business Cycle Barometer: Constrained By Tight Monetary Policy And Global Slowdown

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Global Economic Outlook Q1 2025: Buckle Up

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2025: Trade Uncertainty Threatens Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2025: Immigration Policies Hamper Growth Expectations


Economic Research: U.S. Business Cycle Barometer: Constrained By Tight Monetary Policy And Global Slowdown

Near-Term Growth Prospects Remain Challenging

Our dashboard of leading indicators through mid-January suggests that the U.S. economy is still decelerating, mostly because of tighter monetary policy and a slowing global economy. In November, eight of the 10 leading U.S. indicators we track sent negative (seven) or neutral (one) signals for near-term economic growth prospects, and none of the indicators that have available December data changed its signal. (December data on the Freight Transportation Services Index is pending at the time of this report.)

image

Weak consumer sentiment in the face of rising interest rates and surging inflation is contributing to a higher risk of recession in the U.S. over the next 12 months. However, gas prices have started to decline recently, helping to lift consumers' moods from their low in June.

Where Do We Stand? A Comparison With Past Business Cycles

Eight of the 10 indicators (80%) in November flashed either negative or neutral signals (see chart 1). This has now occurred in each of the last five months for which we have complete data. Seven of the 10 indicators we track gave negative signals in November. Historically (going back to 1980), when over 50% of the indicators we track were negative, a recession followed within 12 months. We continue to expect a shallow and short recession for the U.S. economy in 2023.

Chart 1

image

Yields and quantitative risk of recession

The term spread we use in our dashboard--the difference between the 10-year and three-month Treasury yields--is flashing a negative signal. It has been inverted since November and ended December at -0.75% (see chart 3). Intermediate spreads--the 10-year/two-year and the 10-year/one-year--have been inverted since July. The 10-year/two-year spread moderated to -0.52% in December from -0.72% in November, and the 10-year/one-year edged up to a slightly less inverted -0.90% in December from -1.03% in November.

Most spread models are now pricing in a recession 12 months out. In December, our quantitative assessment of recession risk, based on a spread risks model, gave a 52% probability of a recession in the next 12 months when using the 10-year/three-month spread. The 10-year/two-year spread implies a 44% probability of a recession in the next 12 months, and the 10-year/one-year spread implies a 51% probability (see chart 2). As of Jan. 9, the odds of a recession using the 10-year/three-month term spread have moved higher, to 59%.

Chart 2

image

Corporate credit spreads, S&P 500, and consumer sentiment

The S&P 500 index has fallen 19% from its Jan. 3, 2022, peak while high inflation and a hawkish Federal Reserve made it hard for investors to gain confidence in the market. Corporate credit spreads are widening as rising interest rates undermine growth prospects. On our dashboard, the S&P 500 flashed negative signals for 10 months last year, while credit spreads gave a neutral signal for 10 months in a row.

The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index rose to 59.7 in December from 56.8 in November but is still below its six-month peak of 59.9 in October. Notably, the jump in sentiment from its record low in June has come on the back of an improved one-year economic outlook and falling inflation expectations (see chart 4). The consumer-sentiment signal on our dashboard flashed negative in 10 months last year.

The preliminary sentiment reading for January was surprisingly high, fueled by lower gas prices, raising hopes that consumer sentiment could soon flash neutral on our dashboard. The one-year inflation expectations gauge slid to 4.0% in January from 4.4% in December and is down from the 41-year high that spooked the Fed in March and April. The 5-to-10-year inflation expectations reading edged up to 3.0% from 2.9% in December and stayed close to its 11-year peak of 3.1%, seen both in June and last January. Although inflation expectations have come down, they're still twice what the Fed would like to see, indicating its job is not complete.

Building permits and New Orders Index

The housing market cooled further throughout the second half of last year as mortgage rates climbed; the 30-year fixed rate hit 6.46% on Jan. 13, still below its peak of 7.24% on Nov. 11. The Mortgage Bankers Assn.'s purchase index, which plummeted to an eight-year low in October, has rebounded modestly since then, gaining 5.4% in November and another 2.1% in December. We expect the Fed's aggressive rate hikes to continue until at least the middle of this year, keeping housing demand weak until then.

The Institute for Supply Management's New Orders Index for manufacturers has been declining for the past four months, a sign that weakness in manufacturing activity will persist. The index fell to 45.2% in December, the lowest reading since the start of the pandemic. If we exclude the pandemic-led distortion of new orders, the December print was the weakest since the great financial crisis (see chart 6). The survey also showed that demand was still soft in 11 of the 18 industries it follows, such as wood products; nonmetallic mineral products; fabricated metal products; food, beverage, and tobacco products; chemical products; and furniture and related products.

The institute's New Orders Index for services, which we don't include in our dashboard, also fell in December--to 45.2%, the lowest reading since May 2020. The overall services index unexpectedly fell, to 49.5--contraction territory and a May 2020 low. Prices remained robust at 67.6%, highlighting the sticky prices the Fed must grapple with in the sector.

Credit availability indicators

Banks have further tightened lending standards across all loan categories because of deteriorating market conditions, per the Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey (see chart 7). Lenders believe high inflation will strain borrowers' debt-servicing capacity, increasing lenders' exposure to risk.

The Chicago Fed's National Financial Conditions Index (NFCI) fell by 12 basis points over the past month, signaling slight improvement in market liquidity (see chart 8). The Fed's aggressive rate hikes over the last nine months, however, have limited credit availability. There are other mixed signals: A drop in the NFCI Leverage Sub-Index in December could lead the market to believe that the Fed might slow its rate hikes, while negative real interest rates suggest that the financial market may still be too loose for the Fed's liking.

Real-time economic conditions

The labor market is still strong despite signs of a slowing economy overall. Jobless claims adjusted for the labor force, which respond rapidly to changing business conditions, are still flashing a positive signal in our dashboard. The annual growth rate of the Freight Transportation Services Index, which is released with a lag, is also in positive territory through July.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

Chart 7

image

Chart 8

image

Appendix

Definitions of positive/neutral/negative signals
  • Positive: Overall economic activity will continue to expand in the near term, without an obvious slowdown.
  • Neutral: Overall economic activity will continue to expand but may be slower. Right after a recession, a neutral signal indicates that the recovery may have just started.
  • Negative: Overall economic activities will start to contract shortly afterward, roughly within a year.

Growth Signal Decision Rules
Indicator Decision rule Sample
Term spread
Negative: less than 0 1/1/1978-1/9/2023
Neutral: 0 to 40th percentile
Positive: above 40th percentile
Credit spread
Recession in the past 12 months: 1/1/1997-1/9/2023
Negative: above 90th
Neutral: 75th to 90th
Positive: less than 75th
Recession NOT in the past 12 months:
Negative: above 75th
Neutral: 40th to 75th
Positive: less than 40th
S&P 500
Negative signal in the past 6 months: 1/1/1978-1/9/2023
Negative: below 10th
Neutral: above 10th
Negative signal NOT in the past 6 months:
Negative: below 10th
Neutral: 10th to 25th
Positive: above 25th
Consumer sentiment
Negative signal in the past 12 months: 12/1/1982-12/1/2022
Negative: below 10th
Neutral: above 10th
Negative signal NOT in the past 12 months:
Negative: below 10th
Neutral: 10th to 15th
Positive: above 15th
Jobless claims--adjusted by labor force
Negative: above 75th 1/1/1978-12/1/2022
Neutral: 50th to 75th
Positive: less than 50th
Freight transportation index--annual growth rate
Negative: below 10th 1/1/2000-11/1/2022
Neutral: 10th to 15th
Positive: above 15th
Building permits (single-family)--annual growth rate
Negative: below 25th 1/1/1978-11/1/2022
Neutral: 25th to 40th
Positive: above 40th
ISM New Orders Index for manufacturing
Negative: below 50 1/1/1978-12/1/2022
Neutral: 50 to 52.9
Positive: above 52.9
National Financial Conditions Index
Negative: above 65th 12/1/1982-12/1/2022
Neutral: 40th to 65th
Positive: less than 40th
Fed's loan survey
Recession in the past 12 months: 1Q1996-4Q2022
Negative: above 80th
Neutral: 25th to 80th
Positive: less than 25th
Recession NOT in the past 12 months:
Negative: above 50th
Neutral: 25th to 50th
Positive: less than 25th

The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global Ratings' economics group, which is separate from but provides forecasts and other input to S&P Global Ratings' analysts. S&P Global Ratings' analysts use these views in determining and assigning credit ratings in ratings committees, which exercise analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

U.S. Chief Economist:Beth Ann Bovino, New York + 1 (212) 438 1652;
bethann.bovino@spglobal.com
Research Contributors:Debabrata Das, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai
Soumyadip Pal, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in