articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/221121-china-gas-sector-easing-into-lower-demand-12560548 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

China Gas Sector Easing Into Lower Demand

COMMENTS

Private Markets Monthly, December 2024: Private Credit Trends To Watch In 2025

COMMENTS

Sustainable Finance FAQ: The Rise Of Green Equity Designations

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will COP29 Agreements Support Developing Economies?


China Gas Sector Easing Into Lower Demand

image

Energy security is a lingering headache for China, as the world's largest natural gas importer braces for extended turbulence in the LNG market. S&P Global Ratings believes the country should be able meet demand through its efforts to secure supply and reduce reliance on expensive spot purchases. Dollar margins are likely to improve for gas distributors thanks to their ability to control gas procurement costs, the likelihood of fuel costs coming down next year, and continued passthroughs.

With natural gas key to the country's decarbonization commitments, demand will rise by a total of 175 billion-180 billion cubic meters (bcm) between 2021 and 2030 and peak around 2040, according to oil major China National Petroleum Corp. (CNPC). The pace of growth, however, is slowing, with an expected increase of 65% by 2030 from 2020 levels, compared with a rise of about 212% between 2010 and 2020. The slowdown reflects decelerating growth in consumption in the industrial sector amid waning economic growth and spluttering coal-to-gas conversion for industrial and residential users. The power sector could soon take over as the primary growth driver, looking to support increasing peak-shaving needs to complement China's shift to renewables.

Imported gas should continue to meet 45%-50% of demand through 2030, with an increasing contribution from pipeline imports and long-term liquified natural gas (LNG) contracts, in our estimation. Pipeline gas will account for 40%-45% of total imports by 2030, compared with 35% in 2021, backed by increased deliveries from Russia and Turkmenistan on new and existing pipelines. China also signed sizable long-term LNG contracts in 2021 and 2022, to be executed mainly through 2025. This will reduce the contribution from spot and short-term LNG contracts to the country's overall gas supply mix to 5%-10% over the period, down from 14% in 2021.

S&P Global Ratings forecasts the average dollar margin for rated listed gas distributors will improve by RMB 0.02 in 2023. Our assumption includes lower costs of pipeline and long-term LNG imports because of declining crude oil prices. We also expect local governments to increasingly pass on costs, maintaining retail prices at historically high levels. We believe local governments may be wary of substantially compressing distributors' margins, as non-state-owned participants account for a sizable chunk of the sector.

Supply Keeping Up With Stabilizing Demand

Demand growth has slowed because of a decline in gas usage under stringent COVID restrictions and the economic slowdown. In turn, this has helped alleviate supply-side pressure. In our view, gas consumption growth is likely to drop below 1% in 2022, translating to about 4 bcm of increment demand. This can be met fully by domestic production growth of about 10 bcm and a likely 5 bcm increase in imported pipeline gas (PNG) from Russia, both of which are considerably cheaper than LNG.

Chart 1

image

Ramping up PNG and securing long-term LNG contracts can position China to meet domestic demand. If gas demand in China grows by 7% (about 26 bcm) in 2023, domestic production and pipeline delivery will cover about 70%-75% of the country's needs, while long-term LNG will account for another 15%-20%, assuming 85% contract fulfillment. This leaves spot and short-term cargo demand of 35 bcm-40 bcm (25-29 million tons), lower than the 51 bcm (37 mt) in 2021 as reported by the International Group of Liquefied Natural Gas Importers. This will help reduce the country's exposure to expensive spot LNG prices, which we expect to remain high through 2023.

China's gas source mix will remain relatively diverse, mitigating potential supply disruptions caused by geopolitical risks or force majeure events. In 2021, Turkmenistan PNG and Australian LNG were the only two external sources that accounted for more than 5% of China's gas supply, at 9% and 12%, respectively. Cooperation on energy between China and Russia is deepening as Moscow seeks to divert gas away from Europe, with existing pipeline delivery set to increase to 38 bcm by 2025, with another 10 bcm to arrive through a new Far East pipeline by 2026.

Still, Russia's increased PNG deliveries to China will cover less than half of the drop in exports to Europe by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. China's LNG sources are also diversifying away from its largest supplier Australia--new contracts signed in 2021 and 2022 for 50 bcm focused on the U.S., Qatar, and Russia.

Construction and expansion of regassification terminals is on track to meet rising LNG import needs. As of June 2022, the nominal capacity of China's operating LNG terminal is 132.9 bcm per year (96 mt per year), with another 117.7 bcm per year (85 mt per year) under construction, based on Global Energy Monitor's database. In comparison, China's LNG imports in 2021 were 108.7 bcm. The country's fourteenth five-year plan also laid out ambitious targets to increase storage capacity to 55 bcm-60 bcm by 2025. Underground storage capacity as of 2021 is around 26 bcm, according to domestic research reports.

Chart 2

image

Lower Fuel Costs Ahead

An anticipated decline in gas costs from 2023 will run along the same trajectory as crude oil prices, as supply-demand balance in the oil market improves. Based on S&P Global Ratings assumptions, Brent crude will decline to around US$85/barrel (bbl) in 2023, compared with around US$100/bbl in 2022. This could push gas costs down by an average of 10% for rated gas distributors. The lagging six-month average of the Brent spot price can be used as an indicator for imported gas prices, and thus allows for prediction of total upstream gas costs. China's onshore gas production costs tend to be low, historically fluctuating below RMB1.50 per cubic meter based on mining difficulty, according to local media.

Chart 3

image

We expect local governments to adjust for a smaller decline in retail prices, since costs were not passed on sufficiently in the 2021/2022 winter. This would support the operating viability of gas distributors and prevent disruption to services. Retail prices in 2023 should therefore remain considerably higher than levels prior to 2022. Some end users can handle higher gas prices, such as peak-shaving gas power plants that have passthrough tariffs and commercial users for whom gas accounts for a minor portion of operating costs.

Gas distributors' dollar margin expansion in 2023 will also be supported by a likely higher portion of consumption from commercial and industrial users, which provide better margins. COVID-related lockdowns in 2022 hit their gas volumes but hiked up residential use as people stayed home. The trend should reverse in 2023, barring any major lockdowns. Retail volumes for rated city gas distributors are set to increase by an average of 9% annually over 2022-2024, still above the national average but decelerating from 14.2% in 2021. For the first half of 2022, their gas sales volume grew by 6%, compared with a 0.5% decline nationwide.

Surging costs and inadequate passthrough last winter will undoubtedly compress dollar margins in 2022, but not severely. Under our estimates, the average dollar margin for our rated gas distributors will decline slightly by around RMB 0.03 to RMB 0.46/ cubic meter, narrowing down from RMB 0.05 in 2021, despite similar levels of cost increase in both years. This is due to slightly better passthrough conditions for the non-heating season, whereby many regions allowed retail prices during the winter of 2021/2022 to be carried over.

For the distributors we rate, gas costs will likely surge by 15%-20% in 2022, following the 16% increase in 2021. In the first half of 2022, gas costs rose by about 32% year on year and 12% from the second half of 2021. Costs for winter 2022/2023 will likely exceed that of 2021/2022 based on current crude oil prices.

Chart 4

image

Regulatory Framework Reform To Create Better Operating Environment

China's overarching goal for gas reform is full market liberalization of upstream and downstream pricing (excluding residential users), while keeping midstream transmission and distribution under tight regulatory control. A liberalized market can allow for upstream and end users to adjust their gas supply and usage more quickly and efficiently.

The reform may gradually reduce inefficiency in the current pricing framework, whereby upstream gas prices, which are largely dictated by the big three national oil companies, are more reflective of market supply-demand balance, while end-user retail prices remain influenced by local governments.

Over the past two years, more provinces and cities have rolled out or amended policies on passthrough mechanisms with increasing transparency. They have started to include details on the thresholds to trigger adjustments (typically a 5%-10% cost increase from previous adjustment cycle) and a specified limit on price adjustments (see table 1). Also, a hearing process previously required for adjustment of residential gas prices is being phased out.

Table 1

China Regional Government Passthrough Mechanisms
Residential Nonresidential
Region Announcement date Price adjustment cycle Adjustment threshold* Govt. approval required? Explicit cap on price adjustment? Price adjustment cycle Adjustment threshold* Govt approval required? Explicit limit on price adjustment?
Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region July 2020 ND ND ND ND Three months None Yes No
Yunnan Province July 2020 ND ND ND ND Six months 8% Yes Set by local city govt.
Heibei Province capital - Shijiazhuang Sept. 2020 One year 0.05/cm Yes Yes Six months 0.05/cm Yes No
Hunan Province Jan. 2021 One year 8% Yes Yes Six months 5% Yes Yes
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region April 2021 Six months 5% Yes Yes Three months 5% Yes Yes
Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region April 2021 One year 5% Yes No Heating / nonheating season 8% Yes No
Jilin Province capital - Changchun May 2021 ND ND ND ND Three months 0.1/cm Yes No
Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region June 2021 One year 5-15% Yes No Six months 5-15% Only prefiling required No
Gansu Province Sept. 2021 One year 8% Yes Set by local city govt. Three months 5% Only prefiling required Set by local city govt.
Fujian Province capital - Fuzhou Jan. 2022 Six months 5% Yes No Three months 5% Yes No
Tianjin Municipality March 2022 One year none Yes No Heating / nonheating season None Yes No
Hubei Province capital, Wuhan June 2022 ND ND ND ND No limit 0.1/cm No Yes
Shanghai Municipality Sept. 2022 One year 4% Yes No Two months >0.05/cm Yes No
Shaanxi Province capital - Xi'an Sept. 2022 One year 5% Yes No Three months 5% Yes No
ND--Not dislcosed. * Adjustment threshold represents minimum required change in gas procurement costs from previous cycle.

Still, the quality of passthrough execution varies across the country. In addition to a time lag in price adjustment, the extent of passthrough is dependent on the user category and balancing of social-economic factors. In some areas, such as Shijiazhuang City and Fuzhou City, policies require price adjustments to account for end users' ability to shoulder cost burden, and to prevent large price swings.

The pace of reform will likely be disrupted by the current high gas cost environment, as full passthrough would mean higher volatility and a surge in end user costs. In a downside scenario where crude oil prices continue to rise and China's economy weakens sharply, local governments in certain areas may be less willing to pass on rising costs, as the priority shifts to protecting the industrial sector's operating profits.

Maintaining energy security remains a considerable challenge for China, but efforts to diversify on the supply side should cushion the landing as demand growth falls.

Table 2

Rated Gas Entities In China
Entity Rating Stand-alone credit profile Entity status within group Likelihood of government support

Beijing Gas Group Co. Ltd.

A-/Stable/-- a- Core N/A

China Oil and Gas Group Ltd.

BB/Stable/-- bb N/A N/A

China Resources Gas Group Ltd.

A-/Stable-- a- Strategically important N/A

ENN Energy Holdings Ltd.

BBB+/Stable/-- bbb+ Insulated N/A

Kunlun Energy Co. Ltd.

A/Stable/-- a- Strategically important N/A

Shenergy (Group) Co. Ltd.

A/Stable/-- a- N/A Very high

Towngas Smart Energy Co. Ltd.

BBB+/Stable/-- bb+ Strategically important N/A
N/A--Not applicable.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Congyun Zhou, Singapore + 852 25333576;
colton.zhou@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Apple Li, CPA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3512;
apple.li@spglobal.com
Laura C Li, CFA, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3583;
laura.li@spglobal.com
Christopher Yip, Hong Kong + 852 2533 3593;
christopher.yip@spglobal.com
Research Assistant:Guodong Song, Hong Kong

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in