articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/221020-u-s-housing-finance-agency-programs-have-the-resilience-to-navigate-the-uncertain-economic-landscape-12532970 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Housing Finance Agency Programs Have The Resilience To Navigate The Uncertain Economic Landscape

COMMENTS

U.S. Housing Finance Agencies 2023 Medians: Fiscal Stability Reigns For Now With Some Uncertainty On The Horizon

COMMENTS

Table Of Contents: S&P Global Ratings Credit Rating Models

COMMENTS

Five Takeaways From U.S. Public Finance In 2024: Uneven Credit Trends Emerge Amid Rising Uncertainty

COMMENTS

U.S. Not-For-Profit Higher Education Outlook 2025: The Credit Quality Divide Widens


U.S. Housing Finance Agency Programs Have The Resilience To Navigate The Uncertain Economic Landscape

(Editor's Note: On Oct. 10, 2022, we published new criteria for HFA managed loan programs, "Methodology For Rating U.S. Public Finance Mortgage Revenue Bond Programs." This article includes data that does not reflect the implementation of the new criteria. )

image

Overview

Ratings remain stable through volatile markets.   U.S. housing finance agency (HFA) single- and multifamily programs exhibited rating stability through the volatility of the COVID-19 pandemic and are on track to do so in the face of the economic struggles expected through the next several years. S&P Global Economics has revised its economic forecast downward; its U.S. GDP forecast is 1.6% for 2022 and 0.2% for 2023, as the U.S. economy falls into a shallow recession. Although unemployment remains low at 3.5% in September 2022, we expect unemployment to increase to 4.8% by the end of 2023 and to remain over 5% through 2026 (see "Economic Outlook U.S. Q4 2022: Teeter Totter," published Sept. 26, 2022, on RatingsDirect). Most HFA single-family borrowers are likely to have accumulated equity in their homes, providing flexibility in the event of job loss, although delinquencies might rise in the next several years. Nonetheless, we believe the prudent lending frameworks and active oversight and management of HFAs should limit delinquencies and their impact on the strength of loan programs.

Interest rate increases add to the homebuyer affordability challenge.   The Fed's hawkish stance has already pushed mortgage rates up to 5.18% in the second quarter of 2022, a 13-year high. Mortgage rate increases paused briefly in July but have since risen more than a percentage point over the past two months. The ongoing uncertainty about the impact of the Fed's reduction of its mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and Treasury holdings is adding to the volatility in mortgage rates.

Mortgage payments as a share of household income, on average, were still narrowly below the 25% threshold of affordability through first-quarter 2022. Our affordability measure of mortgage payments as a share of income, assuming a 10% down payment, likely topped 25% in second-quarter 2022 for the typical first-time buyer and is set to worsen to 28% by fourth-quarter 2022--its highest since first-quarter 2007 during the financial crisis--on soaring home prices and mortgage rates (see "The American Dream May No Longer Be In Reach," July 20, 2022). Housing affordability issues have also filtered into the rental market as would-be homebuyers continue to rent, sustaining high demand for rental properties.

Price growth is slowing but demand is cooling.   Coming off a two-year run-up in house prices, the U.S. housing market seems to be losing steam as higher interest rates, inflation, and recession fears have emerged. Before this recent, albeit marginal, slowdown, home prices had surged since the second half of 2020. The S&P/Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index posted a record high in March 2022 at 20.6% year-over-year growth versus March 2021, quadruple the annual average 5% growth rate from 2015 to 2019. More recently, home prices have weakened and we expect the cool-off will continue over the next year. There's evidence that the U.S. housing market may have already slipped into a downturn: Eight of nine census divisions are showing month-over-month declines, according to the September Federal Housing Finance Agency house price index.

We expect these factors to cast a chill on the U.S. housing market generally, but we don't expect them to translate into rating volatility for most HFA programs, as slower originations and prepayments are not necessarily credit negatives. Conventional mortgage applications have been decreasing; according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, mortgage application activity dropped to its slowest pace since 1997 for the week ended Oct. 7, 2022. At some HFAs, single-family originations have fallen as prices and rates push mortgage payments out of reach for their audiences. This experience varies by location and generally those HFAs reporting reductions are experiencing a larger drop in the number of loans originated and higher home prices and related mortgage amounts causing a smaller decrease in loan dollar volume. Much of the decrease in total volume is attributed to declines in utilization of the TBA market, as single-family bond issuance appears to be underway to match last year's volume.

Rents are increasing.   Multifamily affordability is also being stressed, as indicated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) Rental Affordability Index, which fell to an all-time low of 93.1% in the second quarter, on the heels of a 3.4 percentage point decline to 96.5% the previous quarter. HUD considers a rental affordability value of less than 100.0 to indicate that a renter household with median income has less income than typically required to qualify for a median-priced home/rental property. The drop in single-family housing starts, which likely reflects builders' pessimism about the sale of their completed inventory by year-end, may exacerbate the persistent housing supply-demand imbalance and in so doing, might also force some would-be buyers to rent, further pressuring rental affordability given the recent high growth in rents.

Ratings on HFA programs remain high investment-grade.  Demonstrating organizations' resilience and stability during the pandemic, median HFA single-family and multifamily program ratings both remain at 'AA+' with a stable outlook. Single-family opening parity increased to 118.0% from 117.8% while S&P Global Ratings adjusted parity dropped to 112.6% from 114.3%, in part due to heightened prepayments and increasing issuance. In the last year, ratings were unchanged. We revised the outlook to positive from stable on Virginia Housing Development Authority's homeownership mortgage bonds, the outlook on Michigan State Housing Development Authority's single-family mortgage revenue bonds remains negative, and all other program rating outlooks are stable. In the past year, several single-family programs have been redeemed in full, including New Issue Bond programs issued by the District of Columbia HFA, Nebraska Investment Finance Authority, Nevada Housing Division, and North Carolina HFA. Other redemptions include the Montana Board of Housing's first-lien SF II Indenture and Tennessee Housing Development Agency's 1985 General Homeownership Program Bond Resolution.

While median multifamily program opening parity fell to 133% from 143% on the heels of increased issuance and use of program wealth, median adjusted parity rose slightly to 120.3% from 118.6%, reflecting stronger underlying loan performance of the pools, and, in most cases, a return to near-zero delinquency rates after a slight increase during the first year of the pandemic. We recently upgraded two multifamily programs to 'AA+' from 'AA': Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency's housing bonds and Wisconsin Housing and Economic Housing Development Authority's housing revenue bonds. In March, we revised the outlook to positive from stable on the Virginia HFA Rental Housing Resolution; ratings on all other programs have stable outlooks. One multifamily program was redeemed in full: California HFA's Multifamily III Indenture. Average program size rose to $1.755 billion from $1.531 billion last year. Delinquencies have remained in a nominal range, declining year over year to 0.3% from 1.1%.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Delinquencies Fall

Median single-family delinquencies continued their descent to 4.75% as of second-quarter 2022 from a pandemic high of 6.14% in fourth-quarter 2020, dropping by more than 1% as Housing Assistance Fund (HAF) resources were deployed and pandemic-related forbearances began to resolve. As of September 2022, six states' HAF programs were already closed or suspended, with the remainder operating and accepting applications. HFA delinquencies continue to trend higher, on average, than their respective states, as they have since second-quarter 2021. However, they are significantly lower than the 8.85% delinquency for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loans as reported by the Mortgage Bankers Association's second-quarter 2022 national delinquency survey.

Chart 3

image

Government-Backed Assets Continue To Comprise A Larger Percentage of Program Loans

The post-financial crisis trend of HFAs' increasing use of government backing for mortgages continues. Of single-family home loans, 71% were backed by FHA, Veterans Affairs, or U.S. Department of Agriculture government insurance up from last year's 61%. Of the remainder, 15% have private mortgage insurance (PMI) and 14% are not insured, which is typically the case for loans with lower loan-to-value ratios. Of those loans with PMI, slightly more than half of the insurance providers are rated investment-grade.

Chart 4

image

Chart 5

image

Similarly, MBS still constitutes an increasing portion of HFA program assets, inching up in 2021 to 38.9% on average, from 38% in 2020 and 36% in 2019. Although single-family whole loan programs remain the largest program type by percentage, program MBS assets are now included in over 58% of programs.

Chart 6

image

Single-Family Prepayments Should Slow

We expect single-family prepayment speeds to slow as homeowners opt to stay in their homes as the significantly higher prices make trading up more difficult and rising rates make refinancing less attractive. Residential MBS transactions experienced elevated prepayment speeds in 2020 and through third-quarter 2021; however, these have since dropped precipitously (chart 7). For those HFAs that do report prepayment speeds--like Connecticut HFA--prepayments similarly rose significantly in 2020 and 2021 to 172% and 260% Public Securities Association (PSA) prepayment speed from 92% PSA in 2019. Similar to the performance of RMBS (see chart 7), we expect Connecticut HFA's prepayments to decrease this year. For HFAs, this trend will likely strengthen asset-liability ratios and improve profitability over time.

Chart 7

image

Housing Trends Differ Across The Country

As reported by the St. Louis Fed, after decreasing each year from 2005 to a 2016 low of 62.9%, the U.S homeownership rate began to rise, reaching a high of 68% in 2020. As of second-quarter 2022, it had dropped to 65.8%. West Virginia's 77.8% homeownership rate is highest among the 50 states and the District of Columbia is the lowest, at 44.7%.

We believe housing is about 15% overvalued across the U.S. but differs considerably from state to state (see map).

image

Saurabh Khare, of CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai, contributed research to this report.

Related Criteria And Research

Related Criteria
Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Marian Zucker, New York + 1 (212) 438 2150;
marian.zucker@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Joan H Monaghan, Denver + 1 (303) 721 4401;
Joan.Monaghan@spglobal.com
Jessica L Pabst, Centennial + 1 (303) 721 4549;
jessica.pabst@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in