articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220726-economic-research-asia-pacific-varying-core-inflation-paths-drive-monetary-policy-divergence-12451056 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Economic Research: Asia-Pacific: Varying Core Inflation Paths Drive Monetary Policy Divergence

COMMENTS

Economic Research: Global Economic Outlook Q1 2025: Buckle Up

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook U.S. Q1 2025: Steady Growth, Significant Policy Uncertainty

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Emerging Markets Q1 2025: Trade Uncertainty Threatens Growth

COMMENTS

Economic Outlook Canada Q1 2025: Immigration Policies Hamper Growth Expectations


Economic Research: Asia-Pacific: Varying Core Inflation Paths Drive Monetary Policy Divergence

While energy and commodity price hikes have been important in kickstarting inflation globally, it is core inflation that is crucial for inflation prospects in the coming 18 months. Core inflation--the gauge of underlying inflation pressure excluding volatile energy and food prices--is also key for monetary policy. Underlying inflation varies across the Asia-Pacific region; in most economies it is lower than in the U.S. This has important implications for monetary policy prospects and, possibly, currencies.

High inflation has become a serious economic problem, globally.  It erodes purchasing power and forces central banks to hike interest rates, thus slowing economic growth. With headline consumer price index (CPI) inflation at 9.1% in the U.S. and 7.6% in Germany in June, financial markets are anxious about inflation prospects (see chart 1).

While CPI inflation is not as high in the Asia Pacific region as in the U.S. and Europe, it has risen.  The weighted average of the 14 economies we cover in Asia-Pacific reached 3.9% in mid- 2022, from 2.5% in end-2021. Consumer inflation exceeds (upper bounds of) central bank targets in Australia, India, Japan, New Zealand, the Philippines, South Korea and Thailand.

Hefty hikes in energy and commodity prices have contributed substantially to the increase in consumer inflation.   Energy and food have significant weights in consumer baskets, with the latter especially high in developing economies. Even before the Russian invasion of Ukraine, energy and other commodity prices were rising strongly as many economies were recovering from COVID downturns. The conflict pushed them to yet higher levels (see chart 2). In addition, the supply chain and transport constraints that drove up prices of goods during and after the COVID crisis were to some extent also cost-push effects, although it is hard to disentangle demand and supply factors during this unusual process.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

The role of energy and commodity prices should not be overestimated.   In most Asia-Pacific economies energy and food inflation is relatively modest, in part because of government policies such as administrative price-setting (see chart 3). Also, international prices of energy and other commodities don't continue to rise forever--they stop rising eventually. Indeed, most commodity prices have started falling since June.

Most importantly, if such "cost-push" price rises don't lead to significant increases in inflation expectations and core inflation, the price pressure passes without raising CPI inflation for more than a transitory period, if at all. In such circumstances, credible central banks can "see through" the energy and commodity price hikes and refrain from tightening policy.

This is what happened during previous episodes with surging energy and commodity prices such as 2007-2008 and 2011-2014. CPI inflation then didn't rise much in developed economies and, once the higher oil and commodity prices had worked their way through the system, CPI inflation returned to the low rates it had been at before. Meanwhile, central banks left policy rates unchanged.

It is the rise in core inflation in several economies that distinguishes the current episode from previous experiences with surging energy and commodity prices and that has prodded central banks to lift rates rapidly.   In the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, Europe and some Asia-Pacific economies, core inflation has recently taken off substantially more than during previous periods with surging energy and commodity prices in the 2000s and 2010s (see chart 4). One factor has been supply-chain friction during and after the extraordinary COVID crisis. But it is also clear that inflation pressure has become broader and more persistent this time. With tight product and labor markets, more firms pass on cost increases and more employees gain wage increases to offset the price rises.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Once these dynamics are set in motion they are hard to stop. If not addressed, they could lead to the kind of price-wage spirals that haunted developed countries in the 1970s and that many emerging market economies have faced more recently.

The rise in core inflation in the U.S. started in the spring of 2021, at a time that the economy began to recover from COVID lockdowns and the impact of major fiscal stimulus kicked in. With little slack in the economy and low unemployment, core inflation increased steadily since then and was around 6% by mid-2022.

The U.S. Federal Reserve seems to have been slow in acknowledging the high level of core inflation. With a lag, it has turned more hawkish in order to reduce domestic demand to contain pass-through and wage rises. We now expect the Fed to raise the federal funds rate above 3.5% by mid-2023.

Pressure From Core Inflation Differs Across Asia-Pacific

The U.S. inflation picture is in the limelight and matters-greatly for the region because it influences the U.S. Federal Reserve's policy. But for many Asia-Pacific economies it is not representative. Reflecting different economic conditions, core inflation is generally lower, even in the developing ones (see chart 5). That has a bearing on the monetary policy decisions that have taken place and can be expected (chart 6).

In some APAC economies, the inflation picture is close to that in the U.S.   In India and New Zealand core CPI inflation was around 6% in mid-2022, as high as in the U.S. In New Zealand, the reasons behind elevated core inflation are the same as in the U.S. With little slack in the economy and a tight labor market--New Zealand didn't suffer as much of an economic downturn because of COVID--the cost increases have triggered pass-through and wage increases.

India's case is different. Core inflation is traditionally relatively high in the country. There is now in principle significant slack in the economy, as GDP is far below estimates of the pre-COVID trajectory of potential output. But, in part because of a relatively unresponsive supply side, core inflation is rising rapidly anyway.

At the other end of the spectrum, in some Asia Pacific economies core inflation has remained low.   This is generally amid relatively muted domestic demand in economies where the recovery from COVID has not yet completed. In some, a relatively responsive supply side also helps absorb demand pressure. China is a prime example. Domestic demand has been hard hit by COVID lockdowns and restrictions, even as supply in the economy is holding up amid a focus by governments and companies to keep production going. In these conditions, core inflation was only 1% in June and headline inflation is unlikely to significantly exceed the People's Bank of China's 3% target.

Japan's headline inflation was 2.3% in mid-2022 because of the higher energy and commodity prices. But so-called "core core" inflation, which excludes energy and food, was running at 1%. With wage growth in Japan's large service sector unlikely to rise significantly, we agree with the Bank of Japan that headline inflation is likely to fall below 2% again in 2023.

In Indonesia, government policies to cap energy and food price increases have combined with remaining slack in the economy to contain core inflation at 2.6% through June. In Thailand, a large degree of slack has kept core inflation at 2.5% through mid-2022 even as large energy price hikes drove up headline inflation to 7.7%. In Taiwan core inflation has also remained at about 2.5%.

In the middle of the spectrum, in South Korea and Australia core inflation has generally been rising significantly as of late.  In South Korea, it has risen steadily to 4.4% in mid-2022, from 2.7% in end-2021. Australia, like New Zealand, only has quarterly CPI data; core inflation in Australia was 4% in end-March, although it is likely to have risen further in the second quarter.

Central Bank Policy Is Broadly In Line With Core Inflation Pressure

Largely in response to high inflation, the Reserve Bank of New Zealand has been among the most hawkish developed market central banks, having starting hiking its policy rate in October 2021 (see chart 6). Starting from a higher level, the Reserve Bank of India started lifting rates later. But we expect significant additional increases in policy rates there.

On the other hand, amid economic weakness, the People's Bank of China has eased monetary conditions and is supporting credit growth, although it is reluctant to cut interest rates substantially for fear of stoking capital outflows. The Bank of Japan reaffirmed its commitment to very easy monetary policy despite a more hawkish U.S. Fed. With underlying inflation pressure subdued, the BOJ won't raise its policy rate any time soon, we believe. While the ensuing weakening in the yen worried some government officials, there is little sign it will affect the BOJ's policy stance any time soon.

While the Taiwanese central bank has raised its policy rate modestly so far this year, the Indonesian and Thai ones have not yet started to lift their rates; although Bank Indonesia has begun to unwind some of the government bond positions it had accumulated via quantitative-easing operations.

The Bank of Korea was early in starting to normalize policy and has tightened conditions by a relatively large amount. The Reserve Bank of Australia commenced later but is on course to raise rates significantly.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

A Less Hawkish Monetary Stance Vs. The U.S. May Weaken Currencies

In the Asia-Pacific economies where core inflation pressure is lower than in the U.S., policy rates may not rise as much and as fast as in the world's largest economy. As illustrated by the sharp depreciation of the Japanese yen this year, this could lead to more pressure for capital outflows and currency depreciation. Nonetheless, good growth prospects and a comparatively large proportion of equity-based capital flows relative to bond flows should dampen such pressure in several other regional economies. Relatively rapid growth has helped attract foreign capital to the Asia-Pacific region in recent decades.

Major economic impact from the COVID pandemic weakened the region's relative performance in recent years. But we forecast Asia-Pacific GDP expansion of about 4.7% in 2023-2025. The region will keep its status as the world's fastest growing.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Asia-Pacific Chief Economist:Louis Kuijs, Hong Kong 85293197500;
louis.kuijs@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in