articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220713-global-sovereign-rating-trends-midyear-2022-geopolitical-risks-and-surging-inflation-wear-on-the-post-pandem-12436902 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Global Sovereign Rating Trends Midyear 2022: Geopolitical Risks And Surging Inflation Wear On The Post-Pandemic Recovery

COMMENTS

Corporate, Financial Institution, And Government Ratings That Exceed The Sovereign Rating

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CEE Brief: Growth Will Decelerate, But The Outlook Isn't Bleak

COMMENTS

Credit FAQ: How Would China Fare Under 60% U.S. Tariffs?


Global Sovereign Rating Trends Midyear 2022: Geopolitical Risks And Surging Inflation Wear On The Post-Pandemic Recovery

This report does not constitute a rating action.

The post pandemic economic recovery continues to slow and is now further at risk because of increasing geopolitical conflicts, global inflation, and interest rates.  After posting solid 6% growth in 2021, we expect global economic growth to slow in 2022 to 3.6% and 3.5% in 2023. That said, rising global inflation is pressuring central banks to increase interest rates to bring it under control. However, the evolving nature of the factors pushing inflation up are increasing the risk of recession.

Table 1

Real GDP Growth
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
World 6.0 3.6 3.5 3.4 3.4
U.S. 5.7 2.4 1.6 1.9 2.1
Eurozone 5.4 2.6 1.9 1.8 1.6
China 8.1 3.3 5.4 4.9 4.7
Asia-Pacific 6.6 4.2 5.0 4.7 4.6
Latin America 6.9 2.0 1.8 2.2 2.3
Updated with economic outlook and economists Latin American forecasts. Latin American sovereigns included are Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru.

Evolving forces keep inflation high for longer than expected, increasing the risk of recession.  Inflationary pressures started to become more evident toward the fourth quarter of 2021 when pent up demand that could not be fully covered by labor shortages--as business coped with pandemic work restrictions--and disrupted supply chains impaired the lag at which economies reopened. In that context, inflation was thought to mostly be the product of temporary factors that would curve itself as economies reopen. However, the speed at which the labor force went back to its pre-pandemic levels in the U.S., for example, is slower than expected, straining wages. In addition, the zero-COVID-19 policy implemented by China is lasting much longer than expected, keeping Chinese industries operating at limited capacity as they continue to be in and out of long-lasting lockdowns. This in turn is highly disruptive for the normalization of supply chains.

Geopolitical events take the front seat.  On Feb. 24, the Russian armed forces invaded Ukraine, starting a military conflict of a magnitude not seen in Europe since the end of World War II. The world's response to Russia's aggression came swiftly with the EU, the U.S., and other major G-20 nations imposing a severe set of economic sanctions that included Russia's ally Belarus.

The conflict, and the world's response to it, has added major complexities to global inflation and economic growth. Both Russia and Ukraine are among the largest world producers of food and energy. Since the beginning of the conflict, these two heavy components of any consumer price index (CPI) basket have skyrocketed. We expect the conflict to become protracted and pose serious disruptions to global trade and consumer confidence. In addition, the risk interest rates will rise in a disorderly fashion has risen significantly because nonconventional factors are affecting demand and inflation. In this case, a global recession could follow. None of this bodes well for the future of government creditworthiness and its recovery to pre-pandemic levels.

Not all are losing.  Geopolitical tensions like the ones we are seeing now are not positive for anyone, but some of the consequences have helped some sovereigns improve their overall fiscal position or helped to provide a cushion to deal with higher inflation. This is most clearly the case in emerging markets that are large or net commodity exporters. During the first half of the year, we have raised the ratings or revised outlooks positively on Saudi Arabia, Oman, Malaysia, South Africa, and Mexico, among others.

Rating Trends

S&P Global Ratings rates 137 sovereigns globally. Over the last decade, sovereign credit quality has continued to deteriorate, as indicated by a decline in investment-grade sovereign ratings (as a proportion of total sovereign ratings) of almost five percentage points to 51.8% as of June 2022 (see chart 1). In addition, the average rating is now 'BBB-', one notch lower than in 2011, a trend that accelerated during the pandemic (see chart 2).

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

As of June 17, 2022, 14 sovereigns had negative outlooks and eight had positive outlooks. All the negative outlooks are in emerging or frontier market economies (see chart 3 and table 2).

Chart 3

image

Table 2

Sovereigns With Positive Or Negative Outlooks Or CreditWatch Placement As Of July 6, 2022
Positive Negative
EMEA

Andorra

Belarus

Austria

Ethiopia

Cyprus

Guernsey

Italy

Kuwait

Madagascar

Rwanda

Saudi Arabia

Sharjah

South Africa

Slovakia

Turkey

Ukraine

Americas

Guatemala

Bolivia

El Salvador

Panama

Trinidad and Tobago

Default risk is rising and will likely remain high well into 2023.  The number of rated sovereigns in default have increased to four: Lebanon, Suriname, Sri Lanka, and Zambia. Russia also defaulted in April, but we have since withdrawn the ratings. In addition, the number of rated sovereigns in the 'CCC+', 'CCC', or 'CC' category also increased to eight (see table 2), four with negative outlooks, amid more difficult financing conditions as funding costs are increasing globally.

Table 3

Fiscal Conditions For Sovereigns In The ‘CCC’ Category
--Net general government debt / GDP-- --Current account balance / current account receipts-- --General government interests / General government revenues--
% 2022e 2023f 2022e 2023f 2022e 2023f
CCC+
Argentina* 70.3 67.5 2.9 1.8 5.3 5.0
Burkina Faso* 45.3 46.6 (16.2) (16.0) 9.3 9.7
Congo-Brazzaville* 70.1 72.8 35.5 24.3 5.7 6.1
Mozambique* 81.9 82.8 (48.7) (49.6) 13.8 10.9
El Salvador¶ 76.7 78.0 (10.3) (8.9) 18.4 19.2
Ukraine¶ 108.8 98.1 (17.4) (12.1) 13.3 16.1
CCC
Ethiopia¶ 33.3 31.7 (33.5) (37.2) 5.6 5.6
CC
Belarus¶ 46.4 50.9 0.2 (0.2) 7.1 10.6
*Stable outlook. ¶Negative outlook.

Regional Outlooks

Chart 4

image

Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA)

Table 4

EMEA: Sovereign Rating And Outlook Changes December 2021 Versus June 2022
--December 2021-- --June 2022--
Rating Outlook Rating action Rating Outlook

Andorra

BBB Stable Affirmation* BBB Positive

Angola

CCC+ Stable Upgrade B- Stable

Armenia

B+ Positive Affirmation* B+ Stable

Austria

AA+ Stable Affirmation* AA+ Positive

Belarus

B Negative Downgrade CC Watch Neg

Burkina Faso

B Stable Downgrade CCC+ Stable

Congo, D.R.

CCC+ Positive Upgrade B- Stable

Estonia

AA- Positive Affirmation* AA- Stable

Georgia

BB Negative Affirmation* BB Stable

Greece

BB Positive Upgrade BB+ Stable

Guernsey

AA- Stable Affirmation* AA- Negative

Oman

B+ Positive Upgrade BB- Stable

Saudi Arabia

A- Stable Affirmation* A- Positive

Serbia

BB+ Positive Affirmation* BB+ Stable

Sharjah

BBB- Stable Affirmation* BBB- Negative

Slovakia

A+ Stable Affirmation* A+ Negative

South Africa

BB- Stable Affirmation* BB- Positive

Spain

A Negative Affirmation* A Stable

Ukraine

B Stable Downgrade CCC+ Negative
*Rating affirmed, outlook revised. Rating--Long-term foreign currency sovereign credit rating.

Developed Europe.  As of June 2022, 24 of the 30 European developed sovereigns we rate have stable outlooks. However, four sovereigns--Cyprus, Austria, Italy, and Andorra--have positive outlooks, and two--Slovakia and Guernsey--are negative.

Although most European economies have already recovered to pre-pandemic levels in nominal terms, the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, supply shock, and rising borrowing costs are posing additional risks for the stability of many developed sovereigns.

The Russia-Ukraine conflict and Western firm sanctions are causing widespread economic uncertainties in the euro area, destabilizing energy markets and pushing inflation to historical highs that in turn will likely hinder the post-pandemic economic recovery.

We think the capacity to implement progrowth reforms to capitalize on the support from facilities like the Next Generation EU program will be key for creditworthiness. In turn, failure to address persistent structural weaknesses could strain investment and growth, reversing the somewhat positive ratings momentum.

Emerging EMEA.  The post-pandemic economic dynamics and the Russia-Ukraine conflict have had a diverse impact on Europe, the Middle East, and Africa emerging market (EMEA EM) sovereigns. A small group benefited from higher commodity prices (primarily those net energy exporters), but most households in EM sovereigns have been severely hit. Balance of payments and fiscal accounts are feeling the stress of the situation while financing costs and, in some cases even access to financing, is becoming more difficult.

Overall, ratings on EMEA EM sovereigns remain on a downward trajectory, with the number rated 'CCC' and below (including three currently in default) exceeding the number in the 'BBB' rating category for the first time ever. Most notably, the average rating and average GDP weighted ratings for EMEA EM sovereigns hit an all-time low in April 2022 on the back of the downgrade of Russia to 'SD' (selective default),. The ratings were withdrawn later the same month.

Lastly, negative outlooks exceed positive ones by five, but most of these predate the Russia-Ukraine conflict and reflect idiosyncratic factors. For example, our positive outlook on Saudi Arabia reflects not only the fiscal and external benefits of higher oil prices, but its delivery of a series of economic and political reforms

Americas

Table 5

Americas: Sovereign Rating And Outlook Changes December 2021 Versus June 2022
--December 2021-- --June 2022--
Rating Outlook Rating action Rating Outlook

Costa Rica

B Negative Affirmation* B Stable

Curacao

BBB- Negative Affirmation* BBB- Stable

El Salvador

B- Negative Downgrade CCC+ Negative

Guatemala

BB- Stable Affirmation* BB- Positive

Mexico

BBB Negative Affirmation* BBB Stable

Peru

BBB+ Negative Downgrade BBB Stable
*Rating affirmed, outlook revised. Rating--Long-term foreign currency sovereign credit rating.

U.S. and Canada.  Global and domestic developments have worsened the economic prospects of both countries in 2022. Policymakers have less room to maneuver due to worsening economic conditions, including higher inflation, shortages in key products, and higher interest rates (as well as a polarized political environment in the U.S.). That said, the wealth, institutional effectiveness, monetary flexibility, deep domestic capital markets, and other credit strengths of Canada and the U.S. should sustain the high sovereign ratings despite decelerating growth and rising inflation this year.

Latin America and the Caribbean.  Economic performance will suffer in much of Latin America and the Caribbean in 2022 due to both external factors (slower global growth, rising inflation, and higher interest rates) and domestic factors (including the social legacy of the pandemic and political uncertainty in many countries). However, the credit rating impact of these negative trends may be moderate, given sovereign ratings in the region are already quite low (nearly 60% of the regional sovereigns have suffered downgrades since the start of the pandemic).

Central banks throughout the region have been raising their policy interest rates in recent months--before the central banks of the U.S. and the eurozone. We expect the active monetary policy will limit the rise in inflation and ensure that Latin America does not return to the high inflation of the 1980s and 1990s.

Besides the perennial failure to address structural weaknesses to provide sustainable economic growth, Latin America is facing difficult political conditions that severely limit governments' capacity to take corrective measures and reduce the credibility of their execution.

Asia-Pacific

Table 6

APAC: Sovereign Rating And Outlook Changes December 2021 Versus June 2022
--December 2021-- --June 2022--
Rating Outlook Rating action Rating Outlook

Indonesia

BBB Negative Affirmation* BBB Stable

Malaysia

A- Negative Affirmation* A- Stable

Papua New Guinea

B- Negative Affirmation* B- Stable

Sri lanka

CCC+ Negative Downgrade SD --

Taiwan

AA Positive Upgrade AA+ Stable

Vietnam

BB Positive Upgrade BB+ Stable
*Rating affirmed, outlook revised. Rating--Long-term foreign currency sovereign credit rating.

We expect stability across Asia-Pacific sovereign credit ratings in the next one to two years despite rising prices and interest rates and remaining risk from COVID-19. All sovereigns in Asia-Pacific have stable outlooks, with one exception: Sri Lanka, which defaulted on April 25.

On the other hand, during the first half of 2022 we revised the outlooks on Indonesia, Malaysia, and Papua New Guinea to stable from negative based on fewer uncertainties as COVID-19 risks receded and strong economic growth prospects (among the highest of all EMs). In addition, we also upgraded Vietnam to 'BB+' and Taiwan to 'AA+', both with stable outlooks.

Our attention is on China, where the government continues its strict zero-COVID-19 policy. This has continued to strain supply chains as severe lockdowns limit manufacturing capacity. There is also risk that a more deadly and contagious strain of COVID-19 would send the Chinese economy into another wave of lockdowns, significantly affecting its trade partners in the Asia-Pacific. In addition, concerns over U.S.-China relations are a threat to regional credit metrics. Considering the busy political calendar this year, with both midterm elections in the U.S. and the 20th Party Congress in China, reaching political compromises could be more difficult.

The higher inflation in the region will likely not affect most Asia-Pacific sovereign ratings as many sovereigns continue to enjoy healthy external surpluses. In fact, several sovereigns seeing a widening of their current account deficits are doing so from a position of strength that should serve as a buffer within the next 12 months.

Sovereigns in the South Asian region have been most negatively affected by recent developments. These pressures contributed to the Sri Lankan government's default and political unrest in Pakistan, and increased Bangladesh's current account deficits.

Primary Credit Analyst:Roberto H Sifon-arevalo, New York + 1 (212) 438 7358;
roberto.sifon-arevalo@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Joydeep Mukherji, New York + 1 (212) 438 7351;
joydeep.mukherji@spglobal.com
Frank Gill, Madrid + 34 91 788 7213;
frank.gill@spglobal.com
KimEng Tan, Singapore + 65 6239 6350;
kimeng.tan@spglobal.com
Remy Carasse, Paris + 33 14 420 6741;
remy.carasse@spglobal.com
Nicole Schmidt, Mexico City +52 5550814451;
nicole.schmidt@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in