Key Takeaways
- Rated Japanese regional banks' financial results improved in fiscal 2021, helped by the central government's and the central bank's support measures.
- We believe the banks still face a low earnings environment because the profit boost was temporary and available-for-sale securities have lost value.
- We see differences in profitability growing further depending on responses to a changing business environment.
- We may downgrade banks that fail to respond to changing conditions, leading us to view their revenue bases as weakened.
Japan's regional banks got a temporary boost, but how they adapt to a changing environment could further widen differences in their profitability.
Financial results of 11 Japanese regional banks we rate improved in fiscal 2021 (ended March 31, 2022). Combined core net operating profit increased year on year, but much of this was down to temporary support measures from the central government and the Bank of Japan (BOJ). We also note deterioration in unrealized positions on available-for-sale securities due to higher overseas interest rates. With this in mind, we believe sustaining improved profitability remains challenging.
Among Japanese regional banks we rate (see note 1), differences in earnings capacity are widening based on revenue and cost structure profiles, progress in revenue diversification, in addition to the demographics and economic size of respective home markets. Therefore, we may consider downgrading banks that fail to promptly adapt to changes in business environment, leading us to view their revenue bases as weaker than the average of Japan's banking industry.
Rated regional banks' combined core net operating profit rose 17.3% and pretax net profit increased 20.2% year on year in fiscal 2021, thanks to institutional support from the Japanese government and the BOJ and increased interests and dividends from investment securities (see table 1). Operating expenses dropped 2.5% year on year, partially backed by the BOJ's special deposit facility program. Credit costs decreased 36.2% year on year, reflecting ample liquidity support provided to corporations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. The credit costs to outstanding loan balance improved to 12 basis points (bps) from 19 bps.
Table 1
Rated Japanese Regional Banks' Financial Summary In Fiscal 2021 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bil. ¥ | Fiscal 2021 | Fiscal 2020 | Growth (%) | |||||
Net interest income | 819 | 789 | 3.9 | |||||
Fee income | 177 | 167 | 5.6 | |||||
Operating expenses | 635 | 652 | (2.5) | |||||
Credit cost | 77 | 121 | (36.2) | |||||
Net operating profit | 382 | 351 | 8.8 | |||||
Nonconsolidated core net operating profit* | 379 | 323 | 17.3 | |||||
Pretax profit | 370 | 308 | 20.2 | |||||
Net profit | 254 | 215 | 18.4 | |||||
Aggregate figures for 11 regional banks we rate. Fiscal years end March 31 of the following year. Source: S&P Global Ratings, based on companies' disclosures. *Excluding gains or losses on cancellation of investment trusts. |
Profitability: Divergences Amid Low Earnings Environment
We expect interest income on loans for regional banks we rate (aggregate of the 11 regional banks unless otherwise stated) to continue declining. Their average net interest margin before credit costs and operating expenses was 0.88% in fiscal 2021, a decrease of 2 bps year on year. Combined interest income on lending was lower than in fiscal 2020, due to lower yields on newly extended loans, mainly mortgages (see chart 1). This more than offset higher loan yields and loan balance resulting from a surge in loans guaranteed by credit guarantee corporations (CGCs) triggered by the pandemic.
We believe their gross operating revenue will likely remain under pressure; it is mainly interest income on loans, which comprises more than 70% of net interest income (see chart 2). This is because the government's support program, which allowed private financial institutions to provide unsecured and effectively interest-free loans, ceased to be available at the end of March 2021, and we expect borrowers to repay these pandemic-relief loans gradually.
Chart 1
Chart 2
We believe the core, underlying problem facing Japanese regional banks--weakening fundamental earnings capacity--will become clearer as the impact of institutional support measures on net interest income diminishes. The BOJ's provision of special funds in response to COVID-19 will come to end on Sept. 30, 2022. Its special deposit facility program is also set to expire at the end of fiscal 2022, following the revision of its maximum limit in 2021. We estimate these institutional support programs have contributed billions of yen annually to net interest income for many rated regional banks.
BOJ Special Deposit Facility Program
Continued spread of COVID-19 prompted the BOJ to introduce the "Special Deposit Facility To Enhance The Resilience Of The Regional Financial System," a temporary measure from fiscal 2020 to fiscal 2022 to strengthen the business foundations of regional financial institutions operating in a low-earnings environment caused by persistent low interest rates. For eligible regional financial institutions, excess reserve in the current account at the BOJ is remunerated at a +0.1% per annum (special remuneration) if:
- Their ratios of operating expenses (excluding depreciation expenses) to operating revenues improve by more than a certain level; or
- They make institutional decisions such as on business consolidation.
Special remuneration of the former overhead ratio condition is available to eligible financial institutions that satisfy the threshold set for each fiscal year, starting from the September reserve maintenance period in the following fiscal year. Japanese regional banks' (excluding tier 2 regional banks) average excess reserve balance in current accounts at the BOJ totaled about ¥90 trillion as of September 2021. By simply multiplying this by 0.1%, we estimate special remuneration for regional banks to be as much as ¥90 billion.
The profitability of regional banks we rate will increasingly diverge between those adapting to changes in the business environment and those failing to do so, in our view. Many have high market shares in their respective areas of operation. However, gaps in profitability have widened based not only on the demographics and economic size of their home markets, but also on their revenues and cost structures and progress in revenue diversification (see charts 3 and 4). In recent years, an increasing number of regional banks, including Hokkoku Bank Ltd., Shizuoka Bank Ltd., and Iyo Bank Ltd., have changed or plan to change to a holding company structure through a sole share transfer. Lowering the proportion of their lending businesses, which have limited prospects for growth, and establishing new revenue streams in areas where they have a competitive advantage will grow in importance for the regional banks in our view, given the prolonged low interest rates.
Chart 3
Chart 4
Furthermore, we think the future competitiveness and profitability of Japanese regional banks hinge on information technology (IT) and cyber risk management strategies. For example, digital transformation (DX) could offer new revenue opportunities and lower the barrier to entry for competitors by removing geographic constraints. In addition, regional banks have recently sought to develop further decentralized networks in their operations. We believe expertise in the way this has been managed directly affects their exposure to cybersecurity risk. However, they will need to reduce costs sufficiently to promote IT and DX investments, in our view.
We also focus on cases where changing customer needs, for example to address environmental challenges, have led to organizational changes at regional banks. This occurred when the shift to vehicle electrification in the automobile industry indirectly prompted collaborations between regional banks facing common issues--Shizuoka Bank Ltd. and Bank of Nagoya Ltd. formed a business alliance, as did Gunma Bank Ltd. and Ashikaga Bank Ltd. Regional banks play an important role in supporting local economies. We believe providing appropriately timed transition financing for decarbonization through such alliances will help prevent nonperforming loans from arising in the future and create new revenue opportunities.
Asset Quality: Long-Term Credit Risk In Lending And Interest Rate Risk In Investment
We believe Japanese rated regional banks will continue to suffer sporadic credit costs on large borrowers and sectors struggling to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. This is because the Japanese economy is recovering only moderately, fueling uncertainty. We forecast real GDP growth rates of 2.3% in 2022 and 1.9% in 2023, due to a weak rebound of the domestic economy. In fiscal 2021, regional banks we rate had a ratio of credit costs to average outstanding loan balance of 12 bps, down from 19 bps in fiscal 2020. However, we view their credit costs as somewhat higher than pre-pandemic levels, given a surge in COVID-19 relief loans (see chart 5).
Issues such as cost-push inflation, depreciation of the yen, and extensive borrowing due to COVID-19 may hinder recovery in the operating performance of small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) or further worsen their ability to pay debt. The manufacturing industry is on track for recovery. In contrast, while operating performance in the nonmanufacturing sector may improve temporarily thanks to pent-up demand, debt repayment capacity, in terms of net debt-to-EBITDA ratio, has been deteriorating moderately for SMEs in the real estate and transportation sectors since the beginning of the pandemic (see chart 6). Regional banks' CGC-guaranteed lending soared through the pandemic. However, the banks are still exposed to credit risk arising from proper loans (bank loans without guarantees). We believe credit risk of such exposure may be higher than it was before the pandemic, as proper loans incurring interest will more likely remain within the borrowings of corporate customers with weak repayment capacity.
Chart 5
Chart 6
It remains important for regional banks to keep their risk-taking within their loss-absorbing capacity, in our view. The environment for securities investment will remain unstable. The total outstanding balance of securities held by the 11 banks at the end of fiscal 2021 was nearly flat from a year earlier. However, some banks realized losses on foreign bonds or posted gains on sales of stocks (see chart 7). Additionally, unrealized gains on foreign bonds and fixed income-related investment trusts deteriorated substantially and turned to unrealized losses in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021 due to higher overseas interest rates (see chart 8).
We think interest rate risk management has become more important for regional banks. In recent years, a growing number of regional banks have sought longer durations on bonds or have tried to expand exposure to multi-asset investment trusts that take interest rate risk on foreign bonds. Rated regional banks' available-for-sale securities have net unrealized gains if we take into account unrealized gains on stocks. However, income from securities investments is more volatile than that from the lending business, in our view. Thus, we consider securities investment as a risk factor that heightens revenue volatility.
Chart 7
Chart 8
We believe rated regional banks will need to invest surplus funds strategically, given limited demand for loans in home markets and low yields on yen-denominated bonds and deposits at the BOJ. Their investments in Japanese government bonds and municipal bonds increased in fiscal 2021. In fiscal 2022, these banks may also raise exposure to yen-denominated bonds reflecting slight improvement in domestic interest rates, as we expect them to retain a conservative stance toward investing in foreign bonds, due to rising overseas interest rates. Furthermore, their deposits on the asset side, mostly held in current accounts at the BOJ, increased 25.9% year on year at the end of fiscal 2021 (see chart 9) to represent 23.5% of total assets, backed by the BOJ's institutional support measures.
Chart 9
Capitalization Remains Favorable; Risk Factors Like Stock Market Volatility To Remain Manageable
Rated regional banks' capitalization will likely continue to underpin their credit profiles, providing them with loss-absorbing buffers. We consider their capitalization to be more favorable than that of major Japanese banks (see note 2) and comparable with overseas peers. Their combined risk-adjusted capital (RAC) ratio was 9.6% on a weighted-average basis as of Sept. 30, 2021, changing little from 9.7% a year earlier (see chart 10. we calculate the RAC ratio as of March 31, 2022, after obtaining required details). We note additional guaranteed loans helped regional banks contain growth in risk-weighted assets while profits accumulated into capital amid the pandemic.
Chart 10
Volatility in the RAC ratios of rated regional banks, arising from factors such as equity market movements, will likely remain in ranges tolerated by our current credit assessment levels. A large drop in stock prices may cause their RAC ratios to decline, as unrealized gains on stockholdings influence the ratios. However, we estimate that a 30% drop in the market value of rated regional banks' stockholdings from that of Sept. 30, 2021 (when the Nikkei Stock Average was ¥29,453), keeping other conditions unchanged, would only cause their respective RAC ratios to fall within 0.0-1.0 percentage points, depending on the amount of unrealized gains on stocks.
In our view, accumulation of capital by regional banks may decelerate, as many started to pursue aggressive shareholder return policies, raising dividend payout ratios and buying back their shares. Additionally, RAC ratios may come under pressure if rated regional banks materially increase equity investments to corporate customers, for example, to support their restructuring efforts. We consider the risk of such investments as high.
Table 2
Key Financial Indicators In Fiscal 2021 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gross nonperforming loan (NPL) ratio | Loan loss reserves/NPLs | Net NPL ratio | Credit costs/outstanding loan balance | |||||||||
Rated regional banks§ | 1.6 | 43.4 | 0.9 | 0.12 | ||||||||
Major banking groups (consolidated basis)† | 1.2 | 69.3 | 0.4 | 0.27 | ||||||||
Return on assets (ROA) (pretax profit) | ROA (core net operating profit) | Overall interest rate spread including general and administrative expenses‡ | Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of the banks subject to international capital standards** | Core capital/risk-weighted assets ratio of the banks subject to domestic capital standards | ||||||||
Rated regional banks§ | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.22 | 14.0 | 11.0 | |||||||
Major banking groups (consolidated basis)† | 0.35 | 0.41 | 0.09 | 12.4 | N.A. | |||||||
Growth rate of outstanding balance of deposits | Growth rate of outstanding balance of securities | Growth rate of outstanding balance of loans | Net interest margin decline rate (percentage point)§§ | |||||||||
Rated regional banks§ | 3.9 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 0.02 | ||||||||
Major banking groups (consolidated basis)† | 2.8 | 4.0 | 3.2 | 0.00 | ||||||||
All figures are on a consolidated basis. Fiscal year ended March 31, 2022. §11 Japanese regional banks rated by S&P Global Ratings. †Japan's five major banking groups. ‡Calculated by deducting funding costs from yields on interest-earned assets, based on figures from domestic businesses. **Excludes figures for Resona Holdings. §§Calculated by deducting yields on deposits from yields on loans, based on figures from the domestic businesses. N.A.--Not applicable. |
Table 3
Rated Japanese Regional Banks' ICRs, SACPs, And Subscores | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Issuer credit rating | Outlook | Stand-alone credit profile (SACP) | Anchor | SACP subscore | ||||||||||||||||
Business position | Capital and earnings | Risk position | Funding And Liquidity | |||||||||||||||||
Funding | Liquidity | |||||||||||||||||||
Chiba Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | a- | bbb+ | Adequate | Adequate | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Shizuoka Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | a- | bbb+ | Adequate | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Hachijuni Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | a- | bbb+ | Adequate | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Bank of Kyoto Ltd. | A- | Stable | a- | bbb+ | Adequate | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Iyo Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | a- | bbb+ | Adequate | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Gunma Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | bbb+ | bbb+ | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Keiyo Bank Ltd. | A- | Stable | bbb+ | bbb+ | Moderate (-1) | Strong (+1) | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Higo Bank Ltd. and Kagoshima Bank Ltd.* | A- | Negative | bbb+ | bbb+ | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Hokuriku Bank Ltd.§ | A- | Negative | bbb+ | bbb+ | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
Hokkoku Bank Ltd.† | BBB+ | Stable | bbb | bbb+ | Moderate (-1) | Adequate | Adequate | Adequate | Strong | |||||||||||
*SACP and subscores for Kyushu Financial Group. §SACP and subscores for Hokuhoku Financial Group. † SACP and subscores for Hokkoku Financial Holdings. |
Notes
1. The 11 Japanese regional banks that S&P Global Ratings rates are Bank of Kyoto Ltd., Chiba Bank Ltd., Gunma Bank Ltd., Hachijuni Bank Ltd., Higo Bank Ltd., Hokkoku Bank Ltd., Hokuriku Bank Ltd., Iyo Bank Ltd., Kagoshima Bank Ltd., Keiyo Bank Ltd., and Shizuoka Bank Ltd. We used the group figures of Hokuhoku Financial Group Inc. for Hokuriku Bank Ltd.
2. The holding companies of Japan's five major banking groups are Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc., Mizuho Financial Group Inc., Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc., Resona Holdings Inc., and Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Holdings Inc.
Related Research
- Japan Megabanks: Challenges Ahead For Sustained Earnings Capacity, June 14, 2022
- Japanese Regional Banks' Entry To Nonbanking Business Needs Extra Attention, May 9, 2022
- Japan Bank Outlook 2022: Look Beneath The Surface, Jan. 24, 2022
- Japanese Regional Banks: The Pandemic Bonanza Is A Blip, Sept. 26, 2021
- Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: Japan, June 15, 2022
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Satoru Matsumoto, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8673; satoru.matsumoto@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Chizuru Tateno, Tokyo + 81 3 4550 8578; chizuru.tateno@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.