articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220511-credit-trends-the-number-of-european-ccc-issuers-rises-while-liquidity-and-leverage-indicators-point-to-p-12373521 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Credit Trends: Risky Credits: The Number Of European 'CCC' Issuers Rises, While Liquidity And Leverage Indicators Point To Potential Future Stress

COMMENTS

This Month In Credit: 2024 Data Companion

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: Risky Credits: U.S. And Canadian Risky Credits Drop For Third Straight Quarter Amid Sector Divergences

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: Risky Credits: Defaults Have Driven A Decline In European Risky Credits

COMMENTS

Credit Trends: Risky Credits: Emerging Markets: Issuance Activity And Deleveraging Plans


Credit Trends: Risky Credits: The Number Of European 'CCC' Issuers Rises, While Liquidity And Leverage Indicators Point To Potential Future Stress

(Editor's Note: Our "Risky Credits" series focuses on corporate issuers rated in the 'CCC' category. Because the majority of defaults are from these companies, those with negative outlooks or ratings on CreditWatch negative are even more important to monitor in this uncertain economic recovery.)

image

The number of 'CCC+' and below rated entities rose in the first quarter, but there are pockets of recovery. The tally of 'CCC' and below rated issuers increased to 59 as of March 31, 2022, from 53 as of Dec. 31, 2021, due to several major rating actions and, ultimately, the withdraw of Russia-Ukraine conflict-related entities. Despite the increase, there have also been a few issuers that S&P Global Ratings has upgraded out of the 'CCC' rating category--due to improving operating performance after we downgraded them due to pandemic-related reasons in 2020.

Ratings appear slower to recover in the Europe compared with the U.S. and Canada. The percentage of 'CCC' rated issuers in Europe, at 11%, is higher than its five-year average of just 8%, while in the U.S. and Canada, the percentage of 'CCC' rated issuers has fallen to just 8% and is now lower than its five-year average of 9%. Consequences of the impact of the conflict including higher energy and food prices and the prospect of tighter monetary policy and liquidity conditions may pressure future 'CCC' rated issuer performance.

Two-thirds of the issuers have less-than-adequate or weak liquidity, indicating that the sources of funding available to them in the next 12 months closely match their expected uses of funds. As such, these issuers are highly dependent on operating performance or additional liquidity from external sources, such as access to capital markets, asset disposals, or equity injections by their owners. Average weighted debt to EBITDA leverage for the 'CCC' rating category is 10.5x, with 1.8x interest cover indicating unsustainable capital structures over the next two years for this sector, barring unforeseen favorable developments on the operating side.

About 86% of the sector has a weak or vulnerable business profile, with fairly small scale and limited product/service diversification.

There were no defaults in Europe in first-quarter 2022, bringing down the European speculative-grade default rate to just 0.7% in March 2022. However, the pace of defaults has increased in April with four defaults in the region over the past two weeks (see "Corporate Defaults Inch Up In Europe," published March 31, 2022). We expect cost input pressures to increasingly weigh on corporate margins through the year, and we anticipate default rates to grow to 2.5% as of Dec. 31, 2022.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Table 1

Current Gross Leverage Comparison By Type Of Owner (Median)

BRP Number Debt to EBITDA Interest cover % of total #
Fair CCC+ 6 12.6x 2.2x 9%
CCC 2 14.6x 1.3x 3%
CCC- 1 N.M. N.M. 2%
Weak CCC+ 38 10.2x 1.7x 58%
CCC 8 11.5x 0.5x 12%
CCC- 2 11.2x 1.7x 3%
Vulnerable CCC+ 5 9.0x 2.8x 8%
CCC 2 12.2x 2.1x 3%
CCC- 1 8.9x 1.4x 2%
N.M.--Not meaningful.

A reduction in risk appetite pushed European speculative-grade corporate composite spreads in the first quarter back to 2020 levels. The cost of debt has risen while issuance volumes have plummeted in the first quarter as speculative-grade bond issuance in the region dropped by nearly 90% from previous-year levels. Near-term speculative-grade refinance risk is limited, though tighter conditions may begin to weigh on corporates with weaker balance sheets and near-term refinancing requirements.

Chart 5

image

Media, entertainment, lodging, and leisure is the most exposed sector. But the number of 'CCC' rated issuers in the sector decreased from the previous quarter: we upgraded two issuers (Playa Hotels & Resorts N.V. and International Park Holdings B.V. (PortAventura) out of the rating category due to improved operating performance due to an uptick in consumer demand. The segment also holds the highest upgrade potential by sector because three issuers currently have a positive outlook as the sector's 'CCC' exposure should continue to improve.

Chart 6

image

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Credit Markets Research:Nicole Serino, New York + 1 (212) 438 1396;
nicole.serino@spglobal.com
Patrick Drury Byrne, Dublin (00353) 1 568 0605;
patrick.drurybyrne@spglobal.com
European Leveraged Finance:Marta Stojanova, London + 44 20 7176 0476;
marta.stojanova@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Tanya Dias, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.

 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in