articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/220322-leased-aircraft-stranded-in-russia-the-focus-turns-to-insurance-12318218 content esgSubNav
In This List
NEWS

Leased Aircraft Stranded In Russia: The Focus Turns To Insurance

COMMENTS

U.K. Brief: Removal Of VAT Exemption For Private Schools Is Unlikely To Affect Ratings Over The Short Term

COMMENTS

FAQ: Applying Our Analytical Approach For European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

Analytical Approach: European Green Bond External Reviews

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Good Are Companies At Guarding Against Cyber Threats?


Leased Aircraft Stranded In Russia: The Focus Turns To Insurance

NEW YORK (S&P Global Ratings) March 22, 2022--Aircraft leasing companies have mostly been blocked by the Russian government from repossessing planes leased to Russian airlines. The situation remains unclear and is evolving, but it appears that the lessors' best hope for compensation may come from claims under their insurance policies.

Western sanctions in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, especially sanctions imposed by the European Union (most aircraft leasing companies are domiciled in Ireland, even those owned by Chinese companies), required that lessors terminate their leases to Russian airlines by March 28, 2022 (see our March 1 article, "Aircraft Lessors Hit By Western Sanctions On Russia"). Some planes have subsequently been recovered, but the vast majority remain in Russia. Even though the planes have not been "nationalized," recent Russian legislation requires a license from the government to allow them to leave, effectively blocking such a move. Exposure to Russia is about 2%-10% of total book value of the rated lessors' aircraft portfolio, with the highest exposure being that of SMBC Aviation Capital. For most, the figure is roughly 5%.

We understand there are several layers of insurance protection against potential loss due to confiscation or similar situations that make it impossible to repossess a plane. First, the Russian airline lessees are required to insure each plane, but that is provided under Russian requirements by Russian insurance companies and provides no protection in this situation. Second, the airlines must arrange for that exposure to be reinsured by Western insurance companies. We believe many of those policies may have already been canceled by the insurers on the basis that sanctions block them from providing insurance. Third, and potentially most consequential, coverage is provided by contingency policies on an aircraft lessor's entire fleet of planes. Those policies may limit the amounts insured and basis for claims, but could provide meaningful recovery. Insurance policies of various forms on aircraft generally insure them for an amount in excess of book value. Our discussions with aircraft lessors and insurance companies providing aviation coverage have produced a range of views on potential outcomes, and it is possible these claims could be subject to lengthy negotiations and litigation between the lessors and their insurers.

The lessors also have some exposure in regards to past-due rentals, though lessors state that most Russian airlines have historically been prompt and reliable in paying rent. Of course, this foregone amount will increase with time. Lessors typically have security deposits and maintenance reserves that partly offset their overall exposure. We believe that foregone revenue, while material, is less of an immediate issue than potential total loss of the planes and write-downs of some or all of their aircraft asset value. This is in contrast to what occurred early in the COVID-19 pandemic, when many airlines requested rent deferrals or lease restructurings. The write-downs would be mostly noncash in the period when they are taken, but represent potential reduced future lease cash flows and residual values. Auditors and the leasing companies will soon face the task of determining how this will be presented in financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2022.

We have not taken any rating actions on aircraft leasing companies, though we did place our ratings on seven aircraft-backed debt securitizations on CreditWatch (see "28 Ratings From Seven Aircraft ABS Transactions Placed On Watch Negative On The Russia-Ukraine Conflict," March 15, 2022). We will continue to investigate and evaluate risks and possible outcomes for aircraft lessors as more information becomes available.

This report does not constitute a rating action.

S&P Global Ratings, part of S&P Global Inc. (NYSE: SPGI), is the world's leading provider of independent credit risk research. We publish more than a million credit ratings on debt issued by sovereign, municipal, corporate and financial sector entities. With over 1,400 credit analysts in 26 countries, and more than 150 years' experience of assessing credit risk, we offer a unique combination of global coverage and local insight. Our research and opinions about relative credit risk provide market participants with information that helps to support the growth of transparent, liquid debt markets worldwide.

Primary Credit Analyst:Philip A Baggaley, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7683;
philip.baggaley@spglobal.com
Secondary Contact:Betsy R Snyder, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7811;
betsy.snyder@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in