This report does not constitute a rating action.
Ratings Detail
Current rating | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Type | Rating | |||
Standard ABCP notes(i) | A-1 (sf) | |||
(i)The ABCP can be issued at a discount or interest-bearing basis at either a fixed or floating rate. For floating-rate ABCP, identifiable and quantifiable cash flows from liquidity facilities cover any liabilities. U.S. dollar-denominated standard (nonredeemable). ABCP--Asset-backed commercial paper. |
Rationale
The short-term 'A-1 (sf)' rating on Mackinac Funding Co. LLC’s (Mackinac) U.S. dollar-denominated standard (non-redeemable) asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) notes reflects the following:
- The program's legal structure, including Mackinac's intended bankruptcy-remote status;
- The global master securities lending agreements (GMSLAs) with BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage International Ltd. (BNPPBL; NR) and BNP Paribas SA (BNPP);
- The guarantee with BNPP, as guarantor of BNPPBL's obligations under the GMSLA;
- The hedge agreements in the form of total return swaps (hedge agreements) with counterparties rated at least 'A-1';
- The amounts received from the GMSLAs and hedge agreements being sufficient to pay the outstanding standard ABCP notes on their respective payment dates;
- ABCP note issuance tests that restrict the amounts to no greater than amounts that can be fully supported by a hedge agreement (or similar instrument) and GMSLA (or similar instrument); and
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas' (DBTCA's) ability to carry out its duties as program administrative agent.
Environmental, Social, And Governance
The credit quality of the underlying assets is not material to our rating analysis, so there generally are no material environmental, social, and governance (ESG) credit factors at the asset level. Support providers in ABCP conduits are typically highly rated financial institutions, and our assessment of their creditworthiness incorporates any material ESG credit factors. In our view, exposure to ESG factors in this transaction is limited to the factors related to the support provider. In our view, exposure to ESG factors in this transaction is limited to the factors related to the support provider. For further information, see our U.S. and Canadian, EMEA, Asia-Pacific, and Latin American bank ESG in Credit Ratings.
Program Structure
The chart below shows an overview of the program's structure.
Key Features
Mackinac is a bankruptcy-remote special-purpose entity (SPE) and limited liability company (LLC) incorporated under Delaware law to issue U.S. dollar-denominated standard (nonredeemable) ABCP notes. The ABCP notes can be issued at a discount or bear interest at a fixed or floating rate, with maturities of up to 397 days.
Mackinac will use the ABCP note proceeds to make intercompany loans through a credit agreement with NLMCC LLC (AssetCo), a bankruptcy-remote, multi-use SPE and LLC registered under Cayman law. AssetCo will use the proceeds to purchase U.S. treasuries (t-bills, t-notes, t-bonds, and treasury inflation-protected securities) in the open market.
Under the GMSLAs, AssetCo, as lender, will loan the treasuries to a bank, as borrower (rated as high as the ABCP issued). On the loan start date, AssetCo will transfer the treasuries to a bank, as borrower, and receive cash or securities as collateral, as agreed. On the termination date, AssetCo will receive the treasuries and return any collateral, and the bank will pay the loan fee.
Simultaneously, AssetCo will enter into a hedge agreement with one or more counterparties. Under the hedge agreement, AssetCo will transfer the total return on the treasuries and receive a fixed amount from the hedge counterparty. The interest received under the GMSLA (in the form of a loan fee) plus the fixed interest rate under the hedge agreement will be sufficient to cover the interest on the ABCP notes. The principal on ABCP will be covered by the amounts received from the GMSLA and the hedge agreement. The market value risk of the treasuries will be hedged by the hedge counterparty. As a condition precedent for the issuance of short-term debt, the cash flows from the proposed GMSLA and the hedge agreement will be sufficient to repay amounts owed under the terms of the short-term debt.
Program Overview
Program details | |
---|---|
Program name | Mackinac Funding Co. LLC |
Program type | Single-seller |
Sponsor | Nearwater Liquid Markets LLC (Nearwater) |
Administrator | Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas |
Lender | NLMCC LLC (AssetCo) |
Maximum program limit | None |
Reported program-wide credit enhancement (mil. $) | Not applicable--fully supported |
Support type | Full |
Review type | Program-level |
Preference risk | Treasuries are purchased in the open market; the global master securities lending agreement counterparties and/or guarantor and hedge counterparties are rated entities. |
Bankruptcy-remoteness | Non-consolidation opinions were reviewed addressing the substantive consolidation risk that a bankruptcy of Nearwater Liquid Markets LLC, as parent, would have on both Mackinac and AssetCo. |
Rating dependent participants | |
GMSLA counterparty | BNP Paribas SA |
Guarantor | BNP Paribas SA |
Hedge counterparties | Counterparties rated at least 'A-1' |
Liquidity provider | BNP Paribas SA and hedge counterparties rated at least 'A-1' |
Bank account provider | State Street Bank and Trust Co. |
Support provider | BNP Paribas SA |
Non-rating dependent participants | |
GMSLA counterparty | BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage International Ltd. |
Depositary | Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas |
Custodian | Deutsche Bank Trust Co. Americas |
Counterparty/Credit Quality
Liquidity support
The GMSLA with BNP Paribas Prime Brokerage International Ltd. as guaranteed by BNP Paribas SA, the GMSLA with BNP Paribas SA, and the hedge agreements with counterparties rated at least 'A-1'.
Credit support
The ABCP notes are fully supported by the proceeds received under the GMSLAs, guarantee and the hedge agreements. The payments of the GMSLAs, guarantee, hedge agreements, and ABCP notes are match funded.
Interest rate protection
The interest received under the GMSLAs (in the form of a loan fee) plus the fixed interest rate under the hedge agreement will be sufficient to cover the interest on the ABCP notes.
Foreign exchange hedging
The U.S. treasuries, as well as proceeds from the GMSLAs and hedge agreements are all in U.S. dollars; therefore, foreign exchange hedging is not applicable.
Liquidity outs and limitations
The payments under the GMSLAs, guarantee and hedge agreements are unconditional.
Legal
Substantive consolidation
Mackinac is an LLC incorporated under Delaware law, and its sole member is Nearwater Liquid Markets LLC (Nearwater), according to its formation documents. There is no ongoing economic, financial, or operational dependency on the sponsor, Nearwater, for the performance of the ABCP notes. Nearwater is the sole equity member of both NLMCC LLC and Mackinac. Both NLMCC LLC and Mackinac have been analyzed and are consistent with S&P Global Ratings' bankruptcy remoteness criteria. Non-consolidation opinions were reviewed addressing the substantive consolidation risk that a bankruptcy of Nearwater, as parent, would have on both Mackinac and AssetCo.
Clawback/preference risk
Treasuries are purchased in the open market, which mitigates preference risk. Preference risk relating to payments made by GMSLA, guarantor and hedge counterparties is reflected in the rating on these counterparties.
Cash Flow And Payment Structure
Liability issuance tests
The conditions necessary for DBTCA, as administrator, to issue ABCP notes include but are not limited to:
- Scheduled cash flows from transactions are sufficient to repay in full any related financings;
- Each transaction entered into satisfying rating agency confirmation with non-petition and limited recourse provisions;
- Each transaction counterparty satisfying the minimum rating requirements (that is, at least the current rating on the notes);
- There being no breach of representations and warranties of AssetCo; and
- Any transaction funded complying with the operating guidelines or asset-specific requirements.
Program wind-down events
There are several events that would cause Mackinac to stop issuing the ABCP notes. These events include:
- Events that lead to a stop funding, such as failure to pay fees and expenses, defaults, or termination events with respect to a counterparty;
- Events that lead to an enforcement, such as insolvency of Mackinac or AssetCo or cash flows being insufficient to pay in full any related financings; and
- Operational events that involve a material disruption in communication or third-party events beyond the control of AssetCo.
Waterfall/payment priority
The administrator can allocate proceeds from the available omnibus cash account in the following order of priority:
- Fees and expenses to the administrator not exceeding $200,000 and ensuring all asset monies are sufficient to repay in full any related financings (advances provided by Mackinac to AssetCo via ABCP issuances); then
- Payments due to related financings or to create new assets if directed by AssetCo pari passu with payment of regularly scheduled amounts due related to financings; then
- Payment of any other fees, expenses, and indemnities payable by AssetCo; and then
- Any other fees as directed by AssetCo.
Operational Risk
Review status
Any new transaction counterparty funded in the program will be fully supported by liquidity and credit support providers documented under GMSLAs and hedge agreements schedules and annexes that need prior review by S&P Global Ratings.
Administrator review
The program administrator's experience and past performance are factors in the ratings process. S&P Global Ratings conducts administrator business reviews in consultation with Nearwater to evaluate DBTCA's ability to carry out responsibilities under the program documents, such as:
- Reviewing the related funding request and independently determining whether the proposed asset satisfies the funding requirements;
- Monitoring financing maturities, matching financings to corresponding asset data, and tracking all transactions related to each financing;
- Funding new assets in accordance with the terms of the related funding request; and
- Paying maturing financings and investing excess cash in cash-equivalent investments.
Based on the outcome of the reviews and ongoing communications with Nearwater and DBTCA, we are satisfied that DBTCA is capable of carrying out its responsibilities under the program documents.
Surveillance
Since the ABCP notes are intended to be fully supported based on the proceeds received under the GMSLA as guaranteed by BNPP, the GMSLA with BNPP, and the hedge counterparties rated at least 'A-1', we linked the 'A-1 (sf)' short-term rating on the ABCP notes to the lower of the ratings on BNPP and hedge counterparties rated at least 'A-1'. Therefore, changes to our ratings on any of the GMSLA, guarantor or hedge counterparties, among other things, can result in changes to our rating on the ABCP notes. S&P Global Ratings monitors the ratings on all support providers on an ongoing basis.
Portfolio data
The conduit administrator has provided capacity utilization data for the portfolio as a part of S&P Global Ratings' ABCP conduit surveillance process that is presented below in a standardized format.
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Payment Structure And Cash Flow Analysis Of Structured Finance Securities, Dec. 22, 2020
- U.S. Structured Finance Asset Isolation And Special-Purpose Entity Criteria, May 15, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Counterparty Risk Framework: Methodology And Assumptions, March 8, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABCP: Global Methodology For Analyzing Liquidity Funding Outs And Limitations In ABCP Transactions, Oct. 27, 2014
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Assessing Operational Risk In Structured Finance Transactions, Oct. 9, 2014
- General Criteria: Global Investment Criteria For Temporary Investments In Transaction Accounts, May 31, 2012
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABCP: Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Issued By Multiseller Conduits: Classification And Timing Of Reviews For New-Seller Transactions, April 18, 2011
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABCP: S&P Global Ratings' Analysis Of ABCP Ratings Following Changes To Ratings On Support Providers, Dec. 18, 2008
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABCP: Global Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Criteria, Sept. 29, 2005
Related Research
- Global Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
- Standard & Poor's Clarifies Its Approach To Requests For Rating Agency Confirmation On Structured Finance Transactions, May 18, 2012
- Assessing Credit Quality By The Weakest Link, Feb. 13, 2012
- Standard & Poor's Requests Transaction Performance Metrics From Sponsors Or Administrators Of Global ABCP Conduits, Jan. 12, 2012
Primary Contact: | Dev C Vithani, New York 1-212-438-1714; dev.vithani@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contacts: | Lisa Ardolina, New York 1-212-438-3810; lisa.ardolina@spglobal.com |
Mugdha D Mane, Toronto 1-437-688-4541; mugdha.mane@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.