articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/211213-although-u-s-regulated-utilities-operating-cash-flows-are-set-to-rebound-from-covid-19-credit-quality-remai-12171380 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

Although U.S. Regulated Utilities' Operating Cash Flows Are Set To Rebound From COVID-19, Credit Quality Remains Pressured

COMMENTS

Instant Insights: Key Takeaways From Our Research

COMMENTS

CreditWeek: How Will COP29 Agreements Support Developing Economies?

COMMENTS

BDC Assets Show The Prevalence Of Payments-In-Kind Within Private Credit

COMMENTS

Transportation Companies Face Increasing Cyber Risks


Although U.S. Regulated Utilities' Operating Cash Flows Are Set To Rebound From COVID-19, Credit Quality Remains Pressured

Despite the many risks and challenges that COVID-19 presented to the U.S. regulated utility industry, we believe the industry was successful in offsetting most of these risks and preserving credit quality. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, operating cash flows for many investor-owned utilities in the U.S. were pressured given the economic challenges the pandemic introduced. In particular, many utility customers delayed paying bills or did not pay at all and some utilities are continuing to deal with this today. In many states, policymakers and regulators implemented moratoria on disconnections for non-paying customers, and most utilities halted disconnections for some time on a voluntary basis. Taken together, this introduced incremental pressure for utilities' credit metrics (North American Regulated Utilities' Credit Quality Begins The Year On A Downward Path, April 7, 2021). That said, most states that put a hold on disconnections have let these rules expire and many utilities have resumed their normal billing and collection practices, including disconnects for non-payment. Furthermore, utilities have started to implement bill increases via various regulatory mechanisms at a more normalized pace. Overall, we are seeing operating cash flows begin to recover to pre-pandemic levels, and we expect this trend to continue, leading to higher predictability in operating cash flows.

image

How Lower Cash Collections Affect Credit Metrics

Given that most regulatory jurisdictions allowed their utilities to establish regulatory assets, deferring much of the bad debt expense related to the COVID-19 pandemic for future recovery, their funds from operations (FFO) did not take a big hit from increased bad debt expense. However, operating cash flows did, significantly weakening operating cash flows throughout the industry. During 2020 and 2021, utilities with disconnect moratoria in effect typically had higher bad debt expense, increased delays in cash collections, and higher accounts receivables. All in all, we estimate that the industry's 2020 operating cash flows decreased by about 10% due to delayed payment or non-payment of bills. For the most part, we expect the cash recovery of these expenses to occur in rate cases or in other regulatory proceedings, and generally with some regulatory lag.

Although Sectorwide Cash Flows Are Getting Back To Normal They Lag Pre-Pandemic Levels

Although many utilities continue to struggle with the after-effects of COVID-19, some operating cash flow improvement is already apparent for the sector in 2021 as the economy strengthens and many states end their disconnect suspensions. However, the industry's operating cash flows still remain about 5% behind pre-pandemic levels on a normalized basis after accounting for the impacts of extreme weather (an approximate $15 billion hit on operating cash flows) after weakening by about 10% in 2020. Overall, we estimate that cash flows for the rolling-12-months ended June 30, 2021, are up about 2%-3% from year-end 2020 after we normalize for cash flow impacts related to extreme weather events. We attribute much of this uptick not only to a reversal of accounts receivables but also to bill increases that have taken effect in the first half of the year. Although we have yet to see operating cash flows recover entirely to pre-pandemic levels during the first six months of 2021, we expect the upcoming expiration of the remaining disconnect moratoria, economic improvement across the U.S., and expected recovery of incurred bad debt expense through various mechanisms to result in better operating cash flow. Furthermore, though the degree and timing of this recovery varies by state and by utility, we anticipate that as utilities restart more regular disconnects for nonpayment, their accounts-receivables balances and bad debt expense will decrease.

Chart 1

image

Chart 2

image

Some Utility Companies Deal With Lower Cash Collections

For the most part, utilities in states that extended the suspensions experienced higher bill payment delinquencies. Of the 10 utility holding companies that saw the largest increases to their accounts-receivables balances in 2020 compared to historical trends, we found that eight of them had large portions of their operations in states with prolonged mandated disconnect moratoria ending past the second quarter of 2020.

Table 1

Utility Holding Companies With Largest Increases To Accounts Receivables In 2020*
Increase to accounts receivable 2020 ($ mil.) Three-year historial average change to accounts receivables prior to 2020 2020 increase as a proportion of 2019 operating cash flows

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Co.

1,318.0 125 21.24%

PG&E Corp.

1,182.0 53 24.54%

Consolidated Edison Inc.

543.0 36 17.33%

American Electric Power Co. Inc.

129.0 (141) 3.03%

Edison International

283.0 36 10.05%

Sempra Energy

315.0 69 10.20%

Eversource Energy

352.0 119 17.51%

Southern Co.

222.0 (1) 3.84%

Dominion Energy Inc.

238.0 95 4.57%

FirstEnergy Corp.

129.0 5 5.23%
*Compared to three-year historical average> Source: S&P Global Ratings and company data.

We also found that seven of the top 10 utility operating companies with the largest increases to their accounts-receivables balances in 2020 compared to historical trends are located in states with lengthier disconnect moratoria.

Table 2

Operating Companies With Largest Increases To Accounts Receivables In 2020*
Increase to accounts receivable ($ mil.) Three-year historical average change To accounts receivables prior to 2020 2020 increase as a proportion of 2019 operating cash flows

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

1,160.0 63 24.12%

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc.

577.0 33 23.06%

Southern California Edison Co.

290.0 43 9.60%

PacifiCorp

154.0 (41) 9.95%

Mississippi Power Co.

7.0 (176) 2.06%

Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.

165.0 (9) 22.06%

Virginia Electric & Power Co.

266.0 94 9.55%

San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

134.0 20 12.29%

Entergy Louisiana LLC

79.0 (17) 6.43%

Georgia Power Co.

114.0 24 3.92%
*Compared to three-year historical average. Data in the above tables normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. Source: S&P Global Ratings and company data.

After we normalize cash flows for companies accounting for the material impacts from extreme weather events, which we estimated using public disclosures, we note that for those utilities and holding companies with large portions of their operations in states with active disconnect moratoria in place through the end of third quarter, operating cash flows are largely still not at pre-pandemic levels (we only normalize cash flows in these instances to better isolate companies' delayed bill payments, not to adjust our forecasts for their credit metrics). Furthermore, we maintain a negative outlook on about a third of these companies, many because of minimal financial cushion for their current ratings.

We note that our stable or better rating outlooks on many of the companies in these states benefit from other supportive credit features. This includes being members of a larger more diversified group (e.g., AVANGRID Inc., National Grid North America Inc. and subsidiaries, and WGL Holdings Inc. and subsidiary), having operations in other states (e.g., SJW Group, American Water Works Co. Inc., and Black Hills Corp.), or having more financial cushion in their metrics (Avangrid subsidiaries, San Diego Gas & Electric Co., Atlantic City Electric Co., Jersey Central Power & Light Co., Public Service Electric & Gas Co., South Jersey Industries Inc. and subsidiaries, and Potomac Electric Power Co.).

Table 3

Operating Cash Flow Trends For Publicly Rated Companies In States With Disconnect Moratoria Active Through Q3--New York*
Long-Term ICR Outlook/CreditWatch Short-term ICR 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 RTM

Avangrid Inc.

BBB+ Stable A-2 1561 1763 1781 1588 1288 1255

New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

A- Stable A-2 349 403 416 277 252 251

Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.

A- Stable N.R. 153 218 289 216 215 204

Consolidated Edison Inc.§

A- Negative A-2 3459 3367 2695 3134 2198 2411

Consolidated Edison Co. of New York Inc.

A- Negative A-2 3038 2866 2204 2502 1693 1814

Orange and Rockland Utilities Inc.

A- Negative A-2 158 216 172 190 146 144

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.§

A- Stable N.R. 185 155 129 128 131 134

National Grid North America Inc.§

BBB+ Stable A-2 2072 1970 2304 2327 2430 2292

KeySpan Gas East Corp.

BBB+ Stable N.R. 357 57 244 450 234 259

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

BBB+ Stable A-2 727 844 764 636 554 685

Brooklyn Union Gas Co. (The)

BBB+ Stable N.R. 272 155 263 292 296 268
*Normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. National Grid North America and subs year-end is 3/31 and subs 2021 RTM is their FY 2021 numbers ended 3/31. ICR--Issuer credit rating. RTM--Rolling-12-months. N.R.--Not rated. §Holding company or individual operating company.

Table 4

Operating Cash Flow Trends For Publicly Rated Companies In States With Disconnect Moratoria Active Through Q3--California*
Rating Outlook/CreditWatch Short-term ICR 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 RTM

American States Water Co.§

A+ Negative N.R. 97 145 137 117 122 117

Golden State Water Co.

A+ Negative N.R. 101 130 120 97 110 109

California Water Service Co.§

A+ Stable N.R. 160 148 179 169 118 166

Edison International§

BBB Stable A-2 3254 3597 3305 2817 2408 2637

Southern California Edison Co.

BBB Stable A-2 3521 3735 3319 3033 2572 2834

PG&E Corp.§

BB- Negative N.R. 4409 5977 4752 4816 2070 355

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

BB- Negative N.R. 4344 5916 4704 4810 2054 857

Sempra Energy§

BBB+ Negative A-2 2311 3625 3516 3424 2604 3832

San Diego Gas & Electric Co.

BBB+ Stable A-2 1323 1547 1584 1413 1402 1274

Southern California Gas Co.

A Negative A-1 671 1306 1013 868 1526 1291

SJW Group§

A- Stable N.R. 115 101 91 130 104 139

San Jose Water Co.

A Stable N.R. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. §Holding company or indivdual operating company. ICR--Issuer credit rating. RTM--Rolling-12-months. N.R.--Not rated. N/A--Not available.

Table 5

Operating Cash Flow Trends For Publicly Rated Companies In States With Disconnect Moratoria Active Through Q3--New Jersey*
Rating Outlook/CreditWatch Short-term ICR 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 RTM

American Water Works Co. Inc.§

A Stable A-1 1289 1449 1386 1383 1426 1415

New Jersey-American Water Co.

A Stable N.R. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Atlantic City Electric Co.§

A- Stable A-2 385 206 228 261 199 211

Jersey Central Power & Light Co.§

BBB Stable N.R. 418 525 211 463 246 218

Middlesex Water Co.§

A Negative N.R. 47 43 46 36 53 47

Public Service Enterprise Group Inc.§

BBB+ Stable A-2 3313 3260 2913 3379 3102 2487

Public Service Electric & Gas Co.

A- Stable A-2 1896 1838 1853 2035 1953 1634

South Jersey Industries Inc.§

BBB Stable N.R. 263 190 144 121 312 347

Elizabethtown Gas Co.

BBB Stable N.R. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

South Jersey Gas Co.

BBB Stable A-2 142 107 113 132 191 227

Suez Water Resources LLC§

A Negative N.R. N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
*Normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. South Jersey Industries Inc. 2020 and beyond included Elizabethtown Gas. ICR--Issuer credit rating. RTM--Rolling-12-months.N.R.--Not rated. N/A--Not available.

Table 6

Operating Cash Flow Trends For Publicly Rated Companies In States With Disconnect Moratoria Active Through Q3--Washington, D.C.*
Rating Outlook/CreditWatch Short-term ICR 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 RTM

Pepco Holdings LLC§

A- Negative N.R. 1152 950 1132 1117 1002 1032

Potomac Electric Power Co.

A- Stable A-2 651 407 474 512 501 481

WGL Holdings Inc.§

BBB- Stable A-3 231 234 323 N/A N/A N/A

Washington Gas Light Co.

A- Stable A-2 240 207 56 203 225 N/A
*Normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. §Holding company or individual operating company. ICR--Issuer credit rating. RTM---Rolling-12-months. N.R.--Not rated. N/A--Not available.

Table 7

Operating Cash Flow Trends For Publicly Rated Companies In States With Disconnect Moratoria Active Through Q3--Wyoming*
Rating Outlook/CreditWatch Short-term ICR 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 RTM

Black Hills Corp.§

BBB+ Stable A-2 320 428 489 506 542 524

Black Hills Power Inc.

BBB+ Stable N.R. 89 80 85 78 N/A N/A
*Normalized for cash flows concerning extreme weather events such as wildfires and Winter Storm Uri. §Holding company or indivividual operating company. ICR--Issuer credit rating. RTM--Rolling-12-months. N.R.--Not rated. N/A--Not available. Source: S&P Global Ratings and company data.

Spending Continues To Rise Despite Reduced Operating Cash Flow

Although operating cash flows are still recovering to pre-pandemic levels, utility companies increased their capital spending levels by about 5% in 2020, with capital spending on an upward trend through the first half of 2021. This has led to continued negative free operating cash flow for the industry, even on a normalized basis not accounting for the impact of the aforementioned extreme weather events. Although negative free operating cash flow is typical for the utility industry, the level has increased significantly from historical levels. From 2014 to 2020, we estimate that negative operating cash flow has grown by about 6x on a normalized basis, with a 1.5x growth between 2019 and 2020.

Chart 3

image

Chart 4

image

Shareholder Returns Remain A Priority

Even in the face of reduced operating cash flows and continued elevated capital spending, utility companies continue to increase dividend payments. In 2020, we estimate dividend payments to shareholders grew by about 6%, compared to the average growth between 2015 and 2020 of about 7%. The higher dividend payments to shareholders also contribute to the negative discretionary cash flow for the industry as a whole.

Chart 5

image

Chart 6

image

A Look At Financing Trends

The use of debt remains a main source of funding for utilities. And while the use of equity and hybrids is another funding source among utilities, many utilities still rely on debt financing to fund most of their external funding needs. This trend did not change in 2020 given the low interest rate environment and proactive steps many utilities took at the onset of the pandemic to strengthen their liquidity position. As such, we expect that they will continue to fund most of their higher capital spending and dividends with debt, leading to continued pressure on the industry's financial measures and credit quality.

Chart 7

image

Overall, we anticipate that the lower cash flow collections as a result of COVID-19 is transitory and should not result in a permanent increase in leverage because many utilities across the U.S. were able to defer bad debt expense as a regulatory asset to be recovered from customers over the near term. In addition, despite some uncertainty as a result of different COVID-19 variants as well as the pace of vaccinations across the U.S., almost every state, with the exception of three, has ended its disconnect moratoria as of the beginning of December, and many utilities have resumed normal billing and collection practices. Nevertheless, despite the upward trend in operating cash flow for the utility industry, which ordinarily should lead to stronger financial measures, we expect that potential financial improvement is more likely to be muted because of simultaneously rising capital spending and dividends.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analysts:Sloan Millman, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 2146;
sloan.millman@spglobal.com
Fei She, CFA, New York + 2124380405;
fei.she@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Gabe Grosberg, New York + 1 (212) 438 6043;
gabe.grosberg@spglobal.com
Obioma Ugboaja, New York + 1 (212) 438 7406;
obioma.ugboaja@spglobal.com
William Hernandez, Dallas + 1 (214) 765-5877;
william.hernandez@spglobal.com

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software, or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced, or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees, or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness, or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment, and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors, and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.spglobal.com/ratings (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.spglobal.com/usratingsfees.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in