Key Takeaways
- While the vaccination rate in the U.S. is higher than in other major North American and European countries, the rollout in the U.S. is slowing, and rates vary by state. Similarly, mobility trends, up from last month, vary across the country.
- In the job market, the number of initial claims continues to fall, and Indeed job postings are higher than their pre-pandemic level.
- As prices, especially retail gasoline prices, climb, consumers are likely becoming more concerned about their personal financial conditions--as indicated by softening consumer sentiment in May. Together with a substantial rise in travel- and transportation-related prices, it's going to be expensive to travel this summer.
Summary Of Indicators | |
---|---|
Indicator | How the data looks |
Virus and mobility | |
COVID-19 cases and vaccinations | The U.S. continues to lead other developed countries with 42% of its population now fully vaccinated and 51% with at least one dose. However, more than half of the states in the U.S. have vaccination rates below 50% (at least one dose of vaccine). |
Google mobility | Mobility to retail and recreation continued to show steady improvement, staying just 4% below the precrisis level as the economy reopened and lifted restrictions. Illinois and Texas are only 4% below the pre-COVID-19 levels, while New York and California are almost 14% below. |
TomTom: traffic congestion trends | Traffic congestion in most of the major cities has returned to its 2019 levels. |
Consumer sector | |
Consumer sentiment | Consumer optimism, after fading in May (82.9) from April's cycle high (88.3), bounced back to 86.4 in the first half of June. The increase in optimism based on vaccinations and stimulus may have peaked in April. Consumers remained wary about rising inflationary expectations as prices at the pump moved up. Still, the pandemic is ebbing in the U.S., and consumers are coming out to reengage with the economy, with elevated levels of pent-up demand, especially in the travel/transport sector, where demand is outstripping supply. |
High-income versus low-income spending | Household spending, flush with accumulated savings from the generous government support, continued to rise as the economy reopened and the labor market steadily recovers. Low-income households continue to spend more relative to the pre-pandemic normal than high-income households. Surely, unemployment benefit boosters from the federal government helped. In normal times, benefits replace only a fraction of lost earnings, but the CARES Act replaced more than 100% for two-thirds of unemployed workers, boosting low-income household spending. |
Consumer spending segments | Touch-sensitive services spending started to move up as restrictions were lifted. |
People-facing COVID-19-sensitive | |
Open Table | Overall seated diners at restaurants continued to improve as states removed restrictions on dining. However, the U.S. average was still 13% below 2019 levels. Florida and Texas recorded increases of 26% and 11%, respectively, whereas New York and Illinois were 44% and 33%, respectively, below precrisis levels. |
Box Office | With movie theaters starting to open, the Box Office Mojo data shows that there is still some ways to go before we see movie theaters back to pre-pandemic capacity. In late May and early June, only 30% capacity had recovered in movie theaters, which were completely empty a year ago. |
Air traffic | Air traffic continues its upward trajectory since March and currently stands 25% below its 2019 average. |
Current and future activity | |
Chemical Activity Barometer (CAB) | The Chemical Activity Barometer, a leading indicator for industrial activity, increased by 6.4% compared with the 2019 average, which was consistent with the current economic expansion. |
Raw steel capacity utilization | Raw steel capacity utilization has been showing resilience and already surpassed the 2019 average. This reflects strength in U.S. industrial activities despite supply-chain disruptions. |
Rig count and refiner blender net production | Active drilling rigs increased at a slower pace despite crude oil prices hitting their highest since 2018. Net refiner and blender production, however, has recovered to its pre-pandemic levels. |
New business applications | Business applications increased by 46% for the week ended 29 May, compared with the 2019 average. |
Home mortgage applications | Mortgage applications continued to lose momentum, down nearly 25% from January peak. The decline in mortgage applications is largely due to spiraling house prices, tight inventory, and tight lumber supply. This might be keeping some of the potential homebuyers away from homebuying. Both existing and new home sales were down in April, reflecting eroding affordability and tight supply. |
Prices | |
Gasoline prices | U.S. consumers are facing a surge in gasoline price, which increased by 35% this year to $3.03 per gallon (national average). This was the highest gasoline price since October 2014. The surge in gasoline price reflects both the higher global crude oil price and higher demand heading into the peak summer travel months. |
Lumber futures | Lumber futures prices retreated in the past month, down by nearly 19% from a month ago, but remained at an elevated $1272/broad ft. this week. Lumber prices were shooting through the roof, on the back of demand-supply mismatch owing to capacity constraints of North American mills. |
Industrial Metal Price Index | Industrial metal prices have been trending higher to a multiyear high, up nearly 22% this year. With demand surpassing supply, prices are expected to stay high. And with a faster U.S. economic recovery and an infrastructure package in the cards, demand for industrial metal is likely to go up further. |
Labor market | |
Initial jobless claims/continuing claims | Initial jobless claims declined by 9,000 and stood at 376,000 in the week June April 5. The initial claims are just 2% above the 2019 average. Continuing claims in all programs, for the week ended May 22, declined compared with the previous week, except the regular state program. |
Conference Board's jobs plentiful/hard to find (ratio) | In May, the Conference Board survey's labor-market differential--the share of Americans saying jobs are plentiful minus the share reporting jobs are hard to get--posted its strongest one-month gain on record. This reflect the strong labor market recovery. In fact, the recent JOLTS report also reinforced a similar trend. |
Weekly Household Pulse Survey (people employed in the last week) | As per the Household Pulse Survey, around 146.1 million people were employed during the week ended May 24, compared with 146.5 million, which represents a drop of around 0.5 million during this period. |
Indeed job postings | Indeed job postings continued to increase steadily and have shown the highest growth since February 2020. |
The Vaccine Rollout Is Slowing
The U.S. vaccination rates still lead those of major North American and European countries (see chart 1), but in the past four weeks, the rollout in the U.S. was the slowest among the major advanced economies. The share of the population fully vaccinated went up by 7 percentage points (ppt) to 42%, and the share that received at least one dose edged up by 5 ppts to 51%. In contrast, in the past month, the countries in chart 1 experienced an average 11 ppts increase in the share of population fully vaccinated, and a 14 ppts increase in the share of population that has received at least one dose. It is now becoming harder to get people who are either unwilling or unable to get vaccinated to the vaccination sites.
The relatively high vaccination rates in the U.S. are mostly due to the faster pace of inoculation on the East and West Coasts, especially the northeast (see chart 2). Vaccine acceptance aside, people living in more populated cities are likely to be more concerned about getting infected and, as a result, seek protection by getting vaccinated, leading to the uneven vaccination rates across states.
Mobility Ticked Up But Divergence Remains
Outdoor activities and air traffic picked up modestly in the past month. The average number of seated diners even reached its 2019 levels at the end of May (see chart 3). Specifically, the Google Community Trends ticked up to 4% below the pre-pandemic level in early June, from 6% below in the last report (see chart 4). Air traffic was 25% below its 2019 average, up from 33% below last month (see chart 5). Both the number of seated dinners and the traffic congestion trends in parts of the country have reached or surpassed their pre-pandemic levels in late May, despite a small decline in the first week of June.
Although we saw an overall increase in mobility across the country, divergence remains. While restaurants in Texas and Florida have already enjoyed over 10% more diners than they normally did in 2019, those in in New York and Illinois are still having over 30% fewer. Traffic congestion trends in Los Angeles are still 26% below their pre-pandemic levels, while New York and Chicago both saw their congestion trends increasing to the pre-pandemic levels at the end of May (see chart 6).
Chart 1
Chart 2
Chart 3
Chart 4
Chart 5
Chart 6
Housing Demand Is Retreating From The Elevated Level Last Year
Demand for new homes seems to have come down from its elevated levels last year. The Mortgage Bankers Association Purchase Index, at 261.4 as of May 28, declined slightly from 276.7 four weeks ago (see chart 7), extending the downward trend that started mid-March. The surge in home prices due to increasing demand, lumber shortage, and extremely low home inventories may have discouraged home purchases despite mortgage rates staying exceptionally low.
The slowing of new intentions to purchase new homes may have also stopped lumber prices from moving higher (see chart 8). The lumber future prices, which experienced rapid growth since late March, have come down to $1,272 per 1,000 board feet as of June 8, from its peak of $1,564 in the middle of May.
Despite the slowdown in mortgage applications, goods demand may still be on the rise because of the spillover effect from previous and ongoing home purchasing activities. Besides, better financial conditions and the generous government transfers are still supportive of more goods consumption, especially durables.
Indeed, industrial production activities grew steadily in the past month, indicating growing goods demand from consumers. Raw steel capacity utilization, at 82.3% as of June 5, exceeded its 2019 average for the first time since the pandemic started (see chart 9). The Chemical Activity Barometer, a leading indicator of industrial activity, also ticked up to 6.4% above its 2019 average from 5.3% above in the last report (see chart 10).
Chart 7
Chart 8
Chart 9
Chart 10
Chart 11
Chart 12
The Job Market Continued To Improve
The job market is improving at a steady pace, indicated by our real-time trackers. Initial claims for the week ended June 5 were 376,000, falling by 9,000 from the previous week (see chart 13).
After hovering around 800,000 for almost nine months, from August 2020 to April 2021, initial claims have been declining more rapidly since May, by an average of 26,000 per week, despite a relatively small drop in the first week of June. The faster decline in initial claims reflects stronger labor demand from businesses, especially the more labor-intensive service sector, which created 99% of new jobs in the private sector in May, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' nonfarm payroll data.
Businesses do seem to want more help. Indeed daily job postings remained 27% higher than their pre-pandemic level as of May 28, almost unchanged from last month (see chart 15).
The Conference Board also indicated that in May, there were markedly more people who found that jobs are plentiful than those who found that jobs are hard to get. The difference between the share of consumers holding the two opposite opinions widened in May to 34.6 ppt, from 21.6 ppt in April, and has increased for four consecutive months (see chart 18).
Chart 13
Chart 14
Chart 15
Chart 16
Chart 17
Chart 18
Consumer Sentiment Softened Since April (When Fiscal Impulse Peaked) As Inflation On Travel And Transportation Items Rose
The May Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased by 0.6% from its previous month, registering a year-over-year increase of 5.0% before seasonal adjustments. This was the highest CPI inflation reading since August 2008.
Used cars and trucks contributed to one-third of the price increase in May, with their price index jumping by 7.3% from last month, following a 10% month-over-month increase in April. The jump in inflation reflects the base-effect, supply bottlenecks, and growing demand for goods and service encouraged by rebate checks and reopenings.
Admittedly, our inflation forecasts have fallen short (like consensus). A lot of the misses are due to hard-to-forecast pandemic-sensitive items of the consumer basket, such as airfares, used cars, new cars, gasoline, and other transportation, which as a group fall in the travel/transportation category. Americans who may be looking forward to traveling this summer are in for a sticker shock, and it will likely take the rest of the year to iron out supply-side pressure to meet the rising demand.
The surging used-car price is a good example of a pandemic-sensitive demand-supply cross-current: A chain reaction started with the change in transportation preferences during the height of the pandemic (from public to private vehicle transportation), which increased demand for both used and new cars. At the same time, the surge in pandemic demand for electronics that compete for semiconductors led to a global shortage of semiconductors that limited auto manufacturing. Rental agencies that normally offload their used cars to replace their aging stock instead held on to their existing fleet and, in fact, even demanded more used cars as production of new cars fell behind. The chain reaction has led to transitory supply constraints in auto production and, as a result, higher prices as demand outstripped supply.
Witnessing the surge in prices, especially retail gasoline prices, which increased to $3 per gallon as of June 7 (see chart 19), consumers have likely become more concerned about their personal financial conditions. Both the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index and the Conference Board Consumer Confidence Index softened in the second half of May, with both reports mentioning that consumers are relating higher inflation with worsening financial conditions (see chart 20).
In early June, however, the one-year ahead inflation expectation in the University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment report moved down to 4% from 4.6%, and the five- to 10-year ahead measure dropped to 2.8% from 3%.
Chart 19
Chart 20
Chart 21
Chart 22
Chart 23
The views expressed here are the independent opinions of S&P Global's economics group, which is separate from, but provides forecasts and other input to, S&P Global Ratings' analysts. The economic views herein may be incorporated into S&P Global Ratings' credit ratings; however, credit ratings are determined and assigned by ratings committees, exercising analytical judgment in accordance with S&P Global Ratings' publicly available methodologies.
This report does not constitute a rating action.
U.S. Chief Economist: | Beth Ann Bovino, New York + 1 (212) 438 1652; bethann.bovino@spglobal.com |
U.S. Senior Economist: | Satyam Panday, New York + 1 (212) 438 6009; satyam.panday@spglobal.com |
Contributor: | Shuyang Wu, Beijing |
Research Contributors: | Shruti Galwankar, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
Debabrata Das, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai | |
Arun Sudi, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P affiliate, Mumbai |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.