Overview
- We have reviewed Azure Finance No. 1's performance by conducting our analysis of the transaction's underlying assets and structural features.
- Following our review, we have raised our ratings on the class B, C, and D notes.
- Azure Finance No. 1 is an asset-backed securitization backed by a portfolio of U.K. auto loan receivables originated by Blue Motor Finance.
LONDON (S&P Global Ratings) May 24, 2021--S&P Global Ratings today raised its credit ratings on Azure Finance No. 1 PLC's class B notes to 'AAA (sf)' from 'AA (sf)', class C notes to 'AA+ (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)', and class D notes to 'A (sf)' from 'BB+ (sf)'.
Today's upgrades follow our review of the transaction's performance and the application of our current criteria, and reflect our assessment of the payment structure according to the transaction documents (see "Related Criteria").
The transaction has been amortizing strictly sequentially since closing in July 2018, resulting in a significant increase in enhancement for the senior and mezzanine notes (see "New Issue: Azure Finance No. 1 PLC," published on July 12, 2018). As of the March 2021 servicer report, the pool factor had declined to 17.5% (for non-defaulted receivables), and the available credit enhancement for the class B, C, and D notes increased to 83.9%, 46.9%, and 29.7%, respectively, compared with 39.6%, 22.4%, and 14.4% at our last review (see "Azure Finance No. 1 PLC Class A And B U.K. Auto ABS Ratings Raised; Class C And D Ratings Affirmed," published on June 15, 2020).
Given the current pool factor, the observed gross losses from hostile terminations, currently at 6.9% of the initial pool balance, outperformed our expectations in June 2020. In addition, following COVID-19 borrower defaults have not changed materially.
The percentage of customers reported as affected by COVID-19 has been moderate in our view, at 6.5% of performing receivables in the latest servicer report. A high portion of these customers have elected payment arrangements as opposed to complete payment deferrals, with approximately 33% of affected customers continuing to pay at least 50% of their scheduled payments and 11% continuing to pay as normal.
The percentage of customers reported as affected by COVID-19 has improved significantly compared to the peak of the pandemic last year, which as of the June 2020 investor report was 13.5% of the current outstanding balance (for non-defaulted receivables).
Following our review, we revised our base-case hostile termination assumption to 9.0% from 10.0% at our last review, and we have maintained our base-case voluntary termination assumption unchanged compared to our last review at 3.75%.
We have maintained our hostile termination (HT) and voluntary termination (VT) multiples, unchanged and in line with our last review.
We have also maintained the same recovery assumptions as at closing. Lastly, as the collateral backing the notes comprises U.K. fully amortizing fixed-rate auto loan receivables arising under hire purchase (HP) agreements, the transaction is not exposed to residual value risk.
We have performed our cash flow analysis to test the effect of the amended credit assumptions and deleveraging in the structure.
Our cash flow analysis indicates that the available credit enhancement for the class B, C, and D notes is sufficient to withstand the credit and cash flow stresses that we apply at the 'AAA', 'AA+', and 'A' rating levels, respectively. We have therefore raised to 'AAA (sf)' from 'AA (sf)' our rating on the class B notes. We have also raised to 'AA+ (sf)' and 'A (sf)' from 'BBB (sf)' and 'BB+ (sf)' our ratings on the class C and D notes, respectively.
Our credit stability analysis indicates that the maximum projected deterioration that we would expect at each rating level for one-year horizons under moderate stress conditions is in line with our criteria.
There are no rating constraints under our operational risk criteria. In addition, there are no rating constraints under our counterparty or structured finance sovereign risk criteria, and legal risks continue to be adequately mitigated, in our view.
S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating, uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by year-end or later. We use these assumptions about vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.
Azure Finance No. 1 securitizes a portfolio of auto loan receivables, which Blue Motor Finance granted to its U.K. clients.
Related Criteria
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Payment Structure And Cash Flow Analysis Of Structured Finance Securities, Dec. 22, 2020
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Counterparty Risk Framework: Methodology And Assumptions, March 8, 2019
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Incorporating Sovereign Risk In Rating Structured Finance Securities: Methodology And Assumptions, Jan. 30, 2019
- Legal Criteria: Structured Finance: Asset Isolation And Special-Purpose Entity Methodology, March 29, 2017
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABS: Methodology And Assumptions For European Auto ABS, Oct. 15, 2015
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Framework For Assessing Operational Risk In Structured Finance Transactions, Oct. 9, 2014
- Criteria | Structured Finance | ABS: Global Methodology And Assumptions For Assessing The Credit Quality Of Securitized Consumer Receivables, Oct. 9, 2014
- General Criteria: Methodology Applied To Bank Branch-Supported Transactions, Oct. 14, 2013
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Global Derivative Agreement Criteria, June 24, 2013
- General Criteria: Principles Of Credit Ratings, Feb. 16, 2011
- Criteria | Structured Finance | General: Methodology For Servicer Risk Assessment, May 28, 2009
Related Research
- Credit Conditions Europe Q2 2021: New Horizons, Old Risks, March 30, 2021
- Economic Research: U.K. Recovery: Delayed But Stronger, March 9, 2021
- European ABS: Initial Liquidity Risk Evolves To Medium-Term Credit Risk In The Wake Of COVID-19, Dec. 8, 2020
- Azure Finance No. 1 PLC Class A And B U.K. Auto ABS Ratings Raised; Class C And D Ratings Affirmed, June 15, 2020
- New Issue: Azure Finance No. 1 PLC, July 12, 2018
- 2017 EMEA ABS Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis, July 6, 2017
- Global Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
- European Structured Finance Scenario And Sensitivity Analysis 2016: The Effects Of The Top Five Macroeconomic Factors, Dec. 16, 2016
Primary Credit Analyst: | Marta O'Gorman, London + 44 20 7176 2523; marta.ogorman@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.