Key Takeaways
- Tunisian banks' exposure to their sovereign has more than doubled over the past decade along with a sharp increase in government indebtedness.
- Understanding the cost of a hypothetical sovereign default for Tunisia's banks is therefore becoming increasingly relevant, especially in light of the damage that the COVID-19 pandemic has wreaked on the Tunisian economy and the ongoing political divide between the country's three branches of power.
- Although we think a sovereign default remains highly unlikely over the next 12 months, we estimate the cost of such a default for Tunisian banks at $4.3 billion-$7.9 billion, equivalent to 55%-102% of the banking system's total equity or 9.3%-17.3% of forecast 2021 nominal GDP.
The COVID-19 pandemic and the ongoing political divide between Tunisia's three branches of power--the president, prime minister, and speaker of the parliament--are putting significant pressure on Tunisian banks. The economy remains weak, with the IMF forecasting average GDP growth of 2.4% per year for the next five years, following a sharp recession of 8.8% in 2020. S&P Global Ratings believes that future growth will depend on the resolution of the political divisions and on how the government implements reforms. At the same time, Tunisia's indebtedness has increased significantly, with gross debt reaching 87.6% of GDP at year-end 2020 compared with 39.2% at year-end 2010, based on publicly available information. High twin deficits and the absence of decisive reforms to reduce spending are making the country highly dependent on multilateral financing. We think multilateral support should be forthcoming, assuming the country is able to implement the necessary reforms, which would ultimately require a resolution of the political divide. As long as Tunisia receives that support, we do not expect it to default over the next 12 months.
However, questions about the potential cost of a hypothetical sovereign default for Tunisian banks are becoming increasingly relevant. The banks have increased their exposure to the sovereign along with the sharp rise in government indebtedness. On Nov. 30, 2020, Tunisian banks' exposure to their sovereign reached 13.2% of total assets--83.5% of their equity--from 5.1% at year-end 2010. This exposure is much lower than we have observed for Tunisia's peers. In Egypt, for example, the banking system's total exposure to the sovereign stood at 49.5% at year-end 2020. That said, we view Tunisian banks' exposure as a major source of risk should Tunisia default on or restructure its financial obligations.
Overall, we calculate that the cost of a Tunisian sovereign default for the Tunisian banking system could reach $4.3 billion-$7.9 billion, which is equivalent to 55%-102% of the banking system's total equity, or 9.3%-17.3% of forecast nominal GDP at end-2021. Our calculations exclude the potential effect of a sharp depreciation of the Tunisian dinar, which could add to the cost of the default.
We estimated the cost of a hypothetical sovereign default under different scenarios using publicly available information. We first looked at the respective haircuts on 17 emerging market sovereign loss-given defaults or restructurings between 1999 and 2010. The average haircut in these defaults was 42%, ranging from 4% to 89% depending on the case. For Tunisia, our assumptions include a 40%-70% haircut on government exposures and a 5%-10% write-down on loans. We used this write-down for loans, since Tunisian banks' asset quality indicators are already weak.
The Pandemic's Effect On The Economy Is Much Worse Than The 2011 Revolution
According to the IMF's most recent estimates, the pandemic's effect on Tunisia's vital economic sectors, combined with government measures to contain the spread of the virus, led the Tunisian economy to contract by 8.8% in 2020. That is almost 4.5x the contraction Tunisia experienced after the 2011 revolution (see chart 1).
Chart 1
Tunisia's economy, which is small and open, depends on a few economic sectors and exports. Its pre-pandemic economic growth was already low, primarily due to political fragmentation due to its divided parliaments and weak governments. These political differences have impeded much needed economic reforms. In the meantime, high twin deficits have resulted in large external and government indebtedness (see chart 2), leading to an increased reliance on multilateral financial support. The divide between Tunisia's three branches of power has exacerbated the situation, further delaying reform.
Chart 2
A Hypothetical Sovereign Default Could Cost Banks 55%-102% Of Their Total Equity
Tunisian banks' exposure to their sovereign has increased over the past decade, increasing the link between the banks' and the sovereign's creditworthiness (see chart 3). On Nov. 30, 2020, Tunisian banks' direct exposure to the sovereign reached 13.2% of their total assets or 83.5% of total equity. In addition to government bonds, this exposure reflects bank lending to the central government, but it does not account for loans to state-owned enterprises (SOEs). The Central Bank of Tunisia (CBT) does not disclose SOE exposure, but the IMF estimates it at about 9% of banks' total lending.
Chart 3
In light of mounting pressures on Tunisian banks, we have stress tested their exposure to the sovereign under two scenarios. We designed these scenarios based on 17 emerging market sovereign defaults between 1999 and 2010. The average haircut in these defaults stood at 42%, ranging from 4% to 89%. With regard to lending, given that nonperforming loans are already high for Tunisian banks, we capped the potential write-down of the lending book at 10%. Overall, we calibrated our assumptions as follows:
- Scenario 1: A 40% haircut on government exposures and a 5% haircut on the lending book. Under this scenario, the government and banks negotiate to restrict the consequences of the default.
- Scenario 2: A 70% haircut on the sovereign and a 10% write-down on the lending book. We assume that continuing political deadlock results in little or no support from multilateral institutions and leads to a disorderly default. We consider this to be consistent with a scenario of very high stress.
We calculate that the cost for the Tunisian banking system of a sovereign default is $4.3 billion-$7.9 billion, which is equivalent to 55%-102% of the system's total equity or 9.3%-17.3% of the forecast 2021 nominal GDP (see table 1).
Our scenarios do not account for the consequences of a significant depreciation of the Tunisian dinar because the CBT does not report banking system exposures by currency. Depreciation of the Tunisian dinar could put significant additional pressure on the banking system because its net external debt reached 14.5% of total loans on Nov. 30, 2020. Our scenarios also exclude a default or write-down of the banks' exposure to the CBT because the CBT already contributes TND9.0 billion toward the banks' refinancing needs, as of May 7, 2021, which we consider sufficient to cover their exposure on the asset side.
Table 1
Stress Test Results | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(%) | Scenario 1 | Scenario 2 | ||||
Asset write-down assumptions | ||||||
Government debt | 40 | 70 | ||||
Private sector lending book | 5 | 10 | ||||
Asset write-down amount (mil. TND) | 11,419 | 21,113 | ||||
Asset write-down amount (mil. $) | 4,285 | 7,922 | ||||
Asset write-downs/total equity | 55 | 102 | ||||
Asset write-downs/GDP (2021 IMF figure) | 9.3 | 17.3 | ||||
IMF--International Monetary Fund. TND--Tunisian dinar. Source: S&P Global Ratings' calculations. |
Related Research
- Three Tunisian Banks Downgraded On Deepening Economic Risks; Outlooks Stable, May 10, 2021
- Will COVID-19 Trigger The Long Awaited Consolidation Of The Tunisian Banking System? May 6, 2020
- Tunisian Election To Have No Immediate Effect On Banking Sector Ratings, But Implementing Reforms Could Be Challenging, Oct. 16, 2019
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analyst: | Mohamed Damak, Dubai + 97143727153; mohamed.damak@spglobal.com |
Secondary Contact: | Regina Argenio, Milan + 39 0272111208; regina.argenio@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.