articles Ratings /ratings/en/research/articles/210413-u-s-auto-loan-abs-tracker-february-2021-performance-11915557 content esgSubNav
In This List
COMMENTS

U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: February 2021 Performance

COMMENTS

U.S. BSL CLO Obligors: Corporate Rating Actions Tracker 2025 (As Of April 25)

COMMENTS

European CMBS Monitor Q1 2025

COMMENTS

SF Credit Brief: CLO Insights 2025 U.S. BSL Index: Loan Price Volatility Highlights Tariff-Affected Sectors; CLO Metrics Stable Except For Loan Prices

COMMENTS

Tender Option Bond Update Q1 2025: What Tariffs Mean For Muni Securitization


U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: February 2021 Performance

Seasonal factors, including the beginning of tax refund season, higher used vehicle prices, and the economic recovery contributed to strong collateral performance in February for the U.S. prime and subprime auto loan asset-backed securities (ABS) market.

The prime and subprime sectors both reported lower net losses and improved recoveries month over month and year over year. Delinquencies also declined for both sectors year over year, while month-over-month data showed stable delinquencies for the prime sector and declining delinquencies for subprime.

Losses At Multiyear Lows In February

Prime net losses decreased to 0.29% in February from 0.39% in January 2021 and 0.56% in February 2020, making it the lowest February loss rate in our composite's history (see table 1 and chart 1). Meanwhile, subprime net losses decreased to 4.67% in February 2021 from 5.73% in January 2021 and 8.63% in February 2020, which was the lowest February level since 2012. It also marked the first monthly decline following increases for five consecutive months from September to January.

Table 1

Net Loss Rate Composite(i)
Feb-12 Feb-13 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Jan-21 Feb-21
Prime (%) 0.40 0.37 0.41 0.39 0.58 0.63 0.59 0.56 0.56 0.39 0.29
Subprime (%) 4.47 4.93 6.45 6.38 8.06 8.39 9.18 8.67 8.63 5.73 4.67
Subprime modified (%)(ii) 4.39 4.60 5.95 5.67 6.51 6.78 7.24 6.44 6.73 4.63 3.66
(i)Represents monthly annualized losses. (ii)Excludes three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 1

image

Seasonal Patterns Improved Recovery Rates

Prime recoveries increased to 70.08% in February 2021 from 67.02% in January 2021 and 58.16% in February 2020. This was the highest reported February level since 2012 (see table 2 and chart 2).

Subprime recoveries also increased to 46.12% in February 2021 from 44.20% in January 2021 and 41.32% in February 2020.

The strong month-over-month and year-over-year increases reflect improved consumer confidence that has contributed to an increase in demand and prices for used vehicles. For example, wholesale used vehicle prices in February (on a mix-, mileage-, and seasonally adjusted basis) increased 3.80% and 18.3% on a month-over-month and year-over-year basis, respectively, according to the Manheim Used Vehicle Value Index. Furthermore, the supply constraints caused by manufacturing stoppages last year due to the COVID-19 pandemic and stoppages this year because of semiconductor chip shortages also contributed to higher new vehicle prices. This, in turn, supported higher used vehicle prices as well.

Seasonal tax refunds and the latest round of federal stimulus payments in January (i.e., $600 per person for certain individuals) also drove demand for used vehicles, resulting in higher recovery rates across both the prime and subprime sectors.

Table 2

Recovery Rate Composite(i)
Feb-12 Feb-13 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Jan-21 Feb-21
Prime (%) 75.63 69.23 66.57 63.96 57.21 53.97 54.36 56.26 58.16 67.02 70.08
Subprime (%) 53.11 51.84 49.77 48.09 43.52 38.76 39.21 41.41 41.32 44.20 46.12
Subprime modified (%)(ii) 53.26 52.07 50.14 48.34 44.33 40.15 39.59 41.33 41.10 42.96 44.06
(i)Represents monthly recovery rates. (ii)Excludes three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 2

image

Delinquencies Benefited From Stimulus Checks And Tax Refund Season

The prime 60-plus-day delinquency rate of 0.34% in February was stable month over month, but declined from 0.40% in February 2020.

The subprime 60-plus-day delinquency rate decreased to 3.57% in February from 3.71% and 4.94% in January 2021 and February 2020, respectively, and was the lowest February rate since 2014.

Year-over-year delinquency rates improved, especially in the subprime sector (by 137 bps to 3.57% from 4.94% a year earlier), reflecting not only the seasonal tax refunds that started to roll out in February but also the benefits of the federal stimulus aid paid to many consumers in January.

Extensions rates for certain large subprime securitizers remained higher than levels seen prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, which helped keep delinquencies lower than they would be otherwise. An improving economy with lower rates of unemployment and tighter underwriting standards likely contributed to the improvement as well.

Based on the New York Fed Consumer Credit Panel and Equifax credit data, subprime loans originated with a FICO score of less than 620 declined approximately 13% for the last three quarters of 2020 to $81.5 billion from $93.8 billion a year earlier. Meanwhile, loans with a FICO score of 720 or higher increased approximately 2% over the same time to $231.2 billion from $226.8 billion for the last three quarters of 2019.

Table 3

60-Plus-Day Delinquency Rate Composite
Feb-12 Feb-13 Feb-14 Feb-15 Feb-16 Feb-17 Feb-18 Feb-19 Feb-20 Jan-21 Feb-21
Prime (%) 0.41 0.33 0.36 0.36 0.42 0.42 0.43 0.41 0.40 0.34 0.34
Subprime (%) 2.35 2.93 3.38 3.65 4.27 4.70 5.15 4.99 4.94 3.71 3.57
Subprime modified (%)(i) 2.35 2.86 3.18 3.22 3.51 3.59 3.95 3.56 3.52 2.61 2.46
(i)Excludes three large deep subprime issuers: American Credit Acceptance, Exeter, and DRIVE.

Chart 3

image

Extensions Decreased Month Over Month; Still Above Pre-COVID-19 Levels

Extensions declined for two months in a row following increases for four consecutive months in the subprime sector (including public and 144a transactions) and two months in the prime sector.

Subprime extensions decreased to 2.85% in February 2021 from 3.92% a month earlier. However, they were still higher than the February 2020 rate of 2.47% prior to the COVID-19 pandemic (see table 4 and chart 4). These higher year-over-year extension rates were concentrated among public issuers (specifically, Santander issuances: DRIVE saw a year-over-year increase of approximately 174% and Santander saw a year-over-year increase of 78%). Subprime 144a issuers reported near-stable year-over-year extensions of 3.30% in February 2021 compared with 3.38% a year earlier.

Meanwhile, prime extensions declined to 0.40% in February from 0.46% in January and increased eight basis points from 0.32% in February 2020.

We believe the $600 stimulus checks obligors received in January, the onset of tax rebates in February, and the lower levels of unemployment have eased the financial burdens of many consumers, thus bringing February's extensions down to their lowest levels since the pandemic started. However, it's clear that some pockets of the population are still affected, as reflected by higher extensions than those from one year ago. We believe this is issuer-specific, as some issuers have reported stable to lower year-over-year extensions (see table 4).

Table 4

Extensions
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21
Prime--public issuers (%) 0.40 0.32 3.75 5.76 2.16 1.39 0.86 0.63 0.55 0.52 0.55 0.73 0.46 0.40
Subprime--public issuers (%) 2.00 1.53 6.82 15.75 8.90 7.66 5.29 3.22 3.65 3.78 4.06 4.84 3.50 2.43
Subprime--144a issuers (%) 4.48 3.38 6.24 9.76 5.97 3.47 3.11 3.16 3.57 3.88 4.33 5.04 4.22 3.33
Subprime--public issuers plus 144a issuers (%)(i)

3.22

2.47

6.52

12.62 7.35 5.31 4.06 3.19 3.60 3.83 4.21 4.95 3.92 2.85
(i)Reg AB II data used for AmeriCredit, SDART, DRIVE, World Omni Select 2019-A, World Omni Select 2020-A, and Exeter's first public deal, 2020-3. Servicing reports were used for S&P Global Ratings-rated 144a transactions.

image

Auto Loan ABS Rating Activity And Revised Loss Expectations

In March, we revised our loss expectations and took the following rating actions:

These rating actions resulted in 40 upgrades and 27 affirmations in March 2021 (see table 5).

Table 5

Historical Ratings Activity--U.S. ABS Auto Loans
Period Upgrades Downgrades
2015 177 0
2016 357 0
2017 322 0
2018 335 2
2019 432 5
2020 332 8
2021(i) 95 0
Total 2,050 15
(i)As of March 31, 2021.

We lowered our revised expected cumulative net losses (ECNLs) on the 22 transactions we reviewed in March (see tables 6-8). We believe government stimulus, enhanced unemployment pay, and record-high recovery rates have contributed to these transactions performing better than we had originally expected. In addition, government-mandated payment deferrals for up to a year on federally insured mortgages and federal student loans have made it easier for certain consumers to make their vehicle payments.

Table 6

Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised/maintained expected lifetime CNL (%) (Revised March 2021)
2017-B 1.00-1.20 0.80-0.90 0.80-0.90
2017-C 1.00-1.20 0.80-0.90 0.80-0.90
2018-A 1.00-1.20 0.95-1.05 0.80-0.90
2019-B 1.00-1.20 N/A 0.90-1.10
2019-C 1.00-1.20 N/A 0.90-1.10
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 7

Drive Auto Receivables Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised/maintained expected lifetime CNL (%) (Revised March 2021)
2017-A 27.00-28.00 22.50-23.50 Up to 18.80
2017-B 27.00-28.00 20.50-21.50 Up to 16.90
2017-1 27.00-28.00 21.00-22.00 17.25-17.75
2017-2 27.00-28.00 21.00-22.00 16.75-17.25
2017-3 27.00-28.00 21.00-22.00 16.25-16.75
2018-1 26.50-27.50 21.50-22.50 15.75-16.75
2018-2 26.50-27.50 22.50-23.50 17.25-18.25
2018-3 26.50-27.50 22.50-23.50 18.00-19.00
2018-4 26.50-27.50 22.50-23.50 16.75-17.75
2018-5 25.00-26.00 22.50-23.50 16.50-17.50
2019-1 24.00-25.00 24.00-24.50 19.50-20.50
2019-2 24.25-25.25 24.50-25.00 19.50-20.50
2019-3 24.25-25.25 N/A 21.50-22.50
2019-4 24.25-25.25 N/A 21.50-22.50
2020-1 24.25-25.25 N/A 21.50-22.50
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

Table 8

World Omni Select Auto Trust
Series Initial expected net loss range (%) Former expected lifetime CNL (%) Revised/maintained expected lifetime CNL (%) (Revised March 2021)
2018-1 8.75-9.25 7.75-8.25 6.25-6.75
2019-A 6.75-7.25 N/A 6.25-6.75
CNL--Cumulative net loss. N/A--Not applicable.

S&P Global Ratings believes there remains high, albeit moderating, uncertainty about the evolution of the coronavirus pandemic and its economic effects. Vaccine production is ramping up and rollouts are gathering pace around the world. Widespread immunization, which will help pave the way for a return to more normal levels of social and economic activity, looks to be achievable by most developed economies by the end of the third quarter. However, some emerging markets may only be able to achieve widespread immunization by year-end or later. We use these assumptions about vaccine timing in assessing the economic and credit implications associated with the pandemic (see our research here: www.spglobal.com/ratings). As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.

Appendix III: Auto Tracker Methodology And Definitions--Frequently Asked Questions

How do you define prime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize prime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial expected cumulative net losses (CNLs) of 3.00% or less, average FICO scores of 700 or higher, and annual percentage rates (APRs) of 0.00%-5.00%.

How do you define subprime auto loan ABS?

We generally categorize subprime auto loan ABS transactions as those backed by loan pools with initial expected CNLs of at least 7.50%, average FICO scores of less than 620, and APRs that exceed 14.00%.

How do you calculate the monthly net loss rate?

The monthly net loss rate is annualized. It equals each transaction's net loss rate weighted by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. Transactions usually have zero or low losses during their first three months, which dilutes the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly recovery rate?

We calculate recoveries by taking the recovery amount reported (which typically includes all recoveries, including disposition proceeds, post-disposition proceeds, and any other reported recoveries) over the gross loss amount for the current month. We then weight each transaction's recovery percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the index.

We only allow a transaction to enter the index starting in its fourth month outstanding. During a transaction's first three months, unusually high or low recoveries are reported, leading to a spike in the composite figures.

How do you calculate the monthly 60-plus-day delinquency rate?

We calculate delinquencies by taking each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency amount over the ending pool balance for the current month. We then weight each transaction's 60-plus-day delinquency percentage by the transaction's ending pool balance for the current month over the aggregate ending pool balance of all transactions included in the composite.

We only allow a transaction to enter the composite starting in its fourth month outstanding. During the transaction's first three months, zero or lower delinquencies are reported, which dilutes the composite figures.

What is the Auto Loan Static Index (ALSI)?

Our ALSI monitors the credit performance of securitizations that were originated in the same year on a weighted average basis. The number of months displayed for each vintage is generally determined by the last point that all securitizations for that time period have a data point. We calculate the prime and subprime ALSI CNLs by taking the weighted average of the CNLs of the transactions that were completed in the same time period (generally a year). Each transaction's CNL is weighted by its initial pool balance over the aggregate initial pool balance of all the transactions included in the index for that period. In the subprime ALSI, transactions from Byrider Finance LLC (doing business as CarNow Acceptance Corp.), Credit Acceptance Corp., and DriveTime Automotive Group Inc. are excluded because they do not have the typical indirect auto loan business model.

Which transactions are included in the prime, subprime, and modified subprime composites and indices?

For a list of the transactions included in our prime, subprime, and modified subprime composites and indices, see "U.S. Auto Loan ABS Tracker: March 2019," published May 23, 2019. However, note that we subsequently added S&P Global Ratings-rated transactions that have since closed, most prime transactions that closed and were not rated by S&P Global Ratings from 2016 through the present, and most Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust and AmeriCredit Automobile Receivables Trust transactions not rated by S&P Global Ratings.

Related Research

This report does not constitute a rating action.

Primary Credit Analyst:Amy S Martin, New York + 1 (212) 438 2538;
amy.martin@spglobal.com
Secondary Contacts:Jennie P Lam, New York + 1 (212) 438 2524;
jennie.lam@spglobal.com
Kenneth D Martens, New York + 1 (212) 438 7327;
kenneth.martens@spglobal.com
Steve D Martinez, New York + 1 (212) 438 2881;
steve.martinez@spglobal.com
Research Contributor:Radhika Wadhi, CRISIL Global Analytical Center, an S&P Global Ratings affiliate, Mumbai

No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.

Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.

To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.

S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.

S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.


 

Create a free account to unlock the article.

Gain access to exclusive research, events and more.

Already have an account?    Sign in