S&P Global Ratings expects most rated U.S. finance companies in 2021 to face continued challenges related to COVID-19 and perhaps tighter regulation, but to generally navigate through such obstacles. We expect they'll benefit from a rebounding economy, good balance sheet management, and active funding markets.
In their base case, S&P Global economists expect the U.S. economy to grow a modest 4.2% in 2021 after contracting an estimated 3.9% in 2020, with GDP reaching its pre-pandemic level sometime around the third quarter. However, they see downside risk to that forecast and do not expect the unemployment rate to fall to its pre-pandemic level until 2024.
Under those conditions, and at least until vaccines reach wide distribution, finance companies are likely to see difficulties in areas including leveraged lending and commercial real estate (CRE) lending, consumer loans, money transfer, and student lending resulting from social distancing or longer-term secular changes. These will likely lead to rising charge-offs and some need to continue allocating provisions for loan losses in 2021. They will also limit revenue and earnings improvement.
Mortgage companies, which benefited from a surge in origination volumes linked to low rates in 2020, will likely see lower volumes in 2021. Consumers lenders, which, to an extent, staved off asset quality problems thanks to forbearance and eviction moratoriums in 2020, may have to grapple with delayed asset problems this year.
On top of that, the incoming Biden Administration and a Democrat-controlled Congress increase the odds of tighter regulation and enforcement in some areas. Most notably, we believe President-elect Joe Biden could appoint a new head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, who may take a more aggressive approach. He and Democrats in Congress may also push for a higher corporate tax rate, which if successful, could ultimately eat somewhat into earnings.
Nevertheless, we expect the improvement in operating conditions that commenced around last summer for finance companies--characterized by open funding markets, higher asset prices, and reduced asset quality stress--to continue in 2021. We also expect most finance companies to defensively manage their balance sheets. Therefore, while roughly one-third of our ratings on finance companies have negative outlooks, we expect fewer negative rating actions this year than last. In fact, negative actions have subsided greatly since around August 2020 after a flurry of downgrades and outlook changes after the onset of the pandemic.
Chart 1
Regulation And Litigation: New Sheriff In Town, But Let's Not Panic
Key takeaways
- We expect the Biden Administration to be more proactive with regulations and enforcement actions than the Trump Administration, which could affect operations for some of the nonbank financial institutions that we rate.
- We expect the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to shift its stance and messaging the most, followed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and other government enforcement branches such as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).
- Other broader items on President-elect Biden's agenda, such as taxes and certain policy goals, will undoubtedly affect businesses, but we expect the consequences to be less acute than those potentially targeted toward consumer protections for nonbank financial institutions.
Key credit drivers
Not so final: Consumer lending. Despite being recently "finalized," the Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans rules could be revisited by a reinvigorated CFPB. The most likely revisions could focus on the amendments to the original rule, which rescinded rules requiring a lender to determine a borrower's ability to repay and certain underwriting, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements. Such changes would squeeze profitability, by both lowering top-line revenue and increasing operating expenses, and disrupt business models for lenders that are unable to adapt.
Not so fast: Mortgage servicing and forbearance. We believe the Biden Administration could consider extending mortgage forbearance options created under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Moreover, we expect the CFPB will closely scrutinize how servicers manage mortgages that are in forbearance, delinquent, or in foreclosure. This could lead to a revival of fines and penalties that were more common in the immediate aftermath of the global financial crisis during the Obama Administration.
Not done yet: Student loans. In December, then U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos extended student loan forbearance through Jan. 31, 2021. This also includes the pause in interest accrual and the suspension of collections.
What to look for over the next year
Who's the boss? Knowing who the Biden Administration appoints to key cabinet and agency leadership positions will tell us a lot about policy goals for the next four years. Although exiting CFPB Director Kathy Kraninger's term does not end until December 2023, she is removable at will following the Supreme Court's ruling on Seila Law LLC v. CFPB last summer. Also, we expect the Biden Administration's nomination for Secretary of Education will influence the landscape for student loan originators and servicers.
Residential Mortgage: As Good As It Gets?
Key takeaways
- Low interest rates stimulated refinance activity in 2020 and led to a whopping $3.57 trillion of mortgage originations. Although we expect eventual normalization in originations when refinance volumes decrease, the timing of this is difficult to predict, and absolute levels will remain elevated relative to levels over the past decade.
- Heightened originations offset the mark-to-market impairments on mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) caused by declining interest rates for many of our issuers. If rates rise, we expect nonbank mortgage companies to rely less on origination volume and more on recurring servicing income from MSRs.
- We expect continued capital markets access for mortgage issuers at least for the first half of 2021. Following IPOs (Quicken) and unsecured issuances (Quicken, Mr. Cooper Group, PennyMac Financial Services, Freedom Mortgage, and LD Holdings Group LLC), we expect low rates and strong financial results to pave the path to continued capital market activity.
- Companies: Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A., Freedom Mortgage, LD Holdings Group LLC, Mr. Cooper Group, New Residential Investment Corp., OCWEN Financial Corp., PennyMac Financial Services, Provident Funding, and Quicken Loans.
Key credit drivers
How low (can the 30-year) go? Falling interest rates over the last year led to a staggering amount of originations and higher gain-on-sale margins, which resulted in substantial EBITDA growth. At the time of this publication, the 30-year rate has hit an all-time low of 2.67%. If a successful rollout of the vaccine results in a rally in mortgage rates, we could see a return to normal as early as the second half of 2021. The Mortgage Bankers Assn. (MBA) expects originations to decline to a still very robust $2.75 trillion (from $3.57 trillion in 2020) with an average interest rate of 3.2% for 2021. S&P Global expects the 30-year rate to be 3.0% in 2021 and 3.2% in 2022.
Volatility is the constant in residential mortgage. Volatility is inherent in this business, especially with mortgage volume, gain on sale margins, and, ultimately, EBITDA. An issuer's ability to manage through this volatility has a lot to do with the strength of its platform, as well as how effective management is at taking advantage of better economic conditions. Issuers that were proactive in strengthening funding and deepening access to capital markets will likely see these initiatives pay dividends when the origination market inevitably contracts.
Forbearance: A dark spot in an otherwise bright year. While issuers we rate are not generally exposed to credit risk on the loans they originate and service, rising forbearance increases liquidity needs from servicing. If the rise in forbearance results in increased foreclosures, this would also mean higher costs to service. Forbearance overall is 5.53% of total loans, with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac loans at 3.19%, Ginnie Mae loans at 7.85%, and private-label service and other loans at 8.77% (as of Jan. 3). Forbearance is down from the June 2020 peak of overall forbearance of 8.55%, but still significantly above pre-COVID-19 levels.
What to look for over the next year
Gain-on-sale margins: What goes up must come down. Profits are quite literally "earned" in the highly competitive mortgage market. We monitor gain-on-sale margins as indications of market competition. When they widen, there is plenty of volume to go around. When they tighten, competition is heightened and originators are competing for share. There were more than enough originations to go around during 2020, resulting in broad widening of gain-on-sale margins. We expect they'll contract this year as originations decrease and market participants jostle to retain market share.
Normalization of leverage from artificial lows. We expect contractions in originations and gain-on-sale margins to result in increases in our debt to adjusted EBITDA leverage metric in 2021. However, these will be off record-low leverage for many of our issuers in 2020. Leverage in 2021 will also be affected by debt raises that occurred in 2020 and that may continue into 2021.
Chart 2
Chart 3
Auto Lending: Credit Has Been Resilient, But Macro Headwinds Remain Heading Into 2021
Key takeaways
- Delinquencies and charge-offs are lower than expected so far, with many customers transitioned from forbearance, but there could be further deterioration in 2021 depending on macro trends.
- Capital markets remain open, with lower-rated issuers, like subprime auto lenders, tapping the asset-backed securities (ABS) markets at record-low rates, and higher-rated issuers, such as captive auto lenders, issuing in the ABS and unsecured markets at lower rates than before the pandemic.
- Companies: Credit Acceptance Corp., Ford Motor Credit Co. LLC, General Motors Financial Co. Inc., Hyundai Capital America, Hyundai Capital Canada, and World Omni Financial Corp.
Key credit drivers
Credit quality. Significant credit deterioration did not materialize for auto lenders we rate during 2020. Unemployment insurance, stimulus, and forbearance likely played a significant part in keeping delinquencies stable. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) reported net charge-offs for auto loans of 0.32% of average balances for the third quarter of 2020, the lowest quarterly charge-off since the FDIC began reporting this statistic in the first quarter of 2011. Similarly, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York reported auto loans entering 30+ day delinquencies were 5.9% of balances, the lowest since they began reporting the data in 2003. Although delinquencies rose in the second half of the year, they remain well under what we would expect given 6.7% unemployment currently, and peak unemployment above 10% during 2020. We remain vigilant of possible credit deterioration in the first half of 2021, particularly if there are further macro headwinds due to a slower-than-expected decrease in unemployment.
Funding. During March through May 2020, there was some instability in the auto ABS market, but issuers we rate were able to issue in the ABS market in June. Although spreads were wider than normal, falling benchmark rates meant that issuers were able to tap the ABS market at normal rates in June. By September, spreads normalized while benchmark rates remained at record lows, resulting in a near historic low cost of funding.
Key assumptions
Modest deterioration in credit. We expect an increase in delinquencies in 2021, with peak charge-offs during mid- to late-2021.
Continued capital market access. We expect our rated issuers will be able to continue to issue in the ABS market at attractive rates throughout 2021. We expect costs of funding to go up as the economy recovers and benchmark rates rise.
Recovery in originations. We expect originations to recover, particularly in mid- to late-2021. This will be dependent on the pace of economic recovery and could result in modest increases in leverage.
What to look for over the next year
The outlooks on all of the entities we rate in the auto lending sector are negative.
Credit quality. We will be vigilant of deterioration in credit quality if the macro recovery is slower than expected. Increases in delinquency in the first half of the year could indicate a wave of charge-offs to come, with more risk for subprime lenders than captives.
Used-car prices. Net charge-offs have been aided by improving recoveries from better-than-expected used-car values starting in the third quarter. But if used-car prices decline in 2021, and credit deteriorates at the same time, loss given default could increase for lenders. Lower car prices would also have a meaningful impact on losses from leases for captive lenders.
Chart 4
Student Lending: Forbearance Transition Better Than Expected, Loan Forgiveness Still Making Headlines
Key takeaways
- Loan forbearance is declining toward pre-COVID-19 levels for issuers we rate, but credit risks remain if there are any macro headwinds in 2021. We will monitor delinquency figures for signs of deterioration.
- Loan forgiveness was discussed on the campaign trail and continues to make headlines. However, significant hurdles remain. The biggest impact would be to the size of the federal student loan servicing portfolio with some potential marginal impact to origination market share.
- The transition to a single federal servicing platform continues, but a change in administration will likely further push out an end date; the potential for a complete overhaul remains.
- Companies: Navient Corp. and Nelnet Inc.
Key credit drivers
Transition from forbearance better than expected. Issuers we rate holding private student loans and Federal Family Education Loan Program (FFELP) loans saw forbearance decrease 50%-75% from peak levels by the end of the third quarter. Forbearance is now approaching pre-COVID-19 levels without a material increase in delinquencies and charge-offs so far. Headwinds from macro deterioration could pose risks to credit quality, particularly in the first half of 2021.
Loan forgiveness makes headlines, while regulatory reform seems unlikely. Current headlines around loan forgiveness seem to push for one-time loan forgiveness as stimulus via executive order without the need for congressional action. This has many hurdles, in our view, given potential moral hazard. This could take market share away from private lenders on the margin as consumers may be skewed to federal loans by potential future forgiveness, though a large portion of borrowers of private student debt have either exceeded their limits on public borrowing or earn enough income to be excluded from potential forgiveness. Another impact from forgiveness could be materially decreasing the federal student loan servicing portfolio.
Key assumptions
No expected impact from loan forgiveness or regulatory changes in the next year. The current administration has not highlighted student lending reform as a key issue as much as forgiveness, and given divisions in Congress, we think any meaningful reform in student lending is unlikely next year. Although forgiveness is more likely, it is difficult to predict specific criteria for one-time forgiveness.
No implementation of a single servicer for federal loans in 2021. We do not currently anticipate a loss of revenue in 2021 for issuers that have exposure to the federal student loan servicing business, as this becomes increasingly difficult to predict.
What to look for over the next year
The outlooks on all of the entities we rate in the student lending sector are negative.
Single federal loan platform enters third presidential administration. After many starts and stops, the transition to a single federal servicing platform continues. This is likely not going to be a priority of the incoming administration, further increasing uncertainty on when the transition will actually happen. This creates a lot of uncertainty for servicers such as Navient and Nelnet, on top of the risks of the servicing portfolio shrinking from potential forgiveness.
Health of the consumer. Cedit quality has been better than expected so far through the transition away from peak forbearance, but this could change if economic conditions deteriorate. We will look to delinquencies to signal further deterioration in the first half of the year as consumers get further away from exiting forbearance.
Chart 5
Fleet Management And Leasing: Built For The Tough Terrain
Key takeaways
- The fleet management and leasing companies that we rate validated their investment-grade ratings this year and are well-positioned for 2021. Leverage metrics slightly improved in 2020 and credit performance remained strong.
- The pandemic and economic shock during the spring of 2020 temporarily delayed vehicle deliveries and revenue recognition. The Hertz bankruptcy also caused some short-lived trepidations about securitization financing, which eventually abated.
- The underlying thesis remains intact: Fleet management is a mature industry with only a few incumbents and meaningful barriers to entry. A relatively large U.S. market remains untapped as businesses outsource vehicle management functions.
- Companies: Element Fleet Management, Enterprise Fleet Management, and Wheels Inc.
Key credit drivers
Resilient leverage in the face of COVID-19 stress. Fleet Management was one of the few industries that had a decline in leverage through the stress. Amortizing and match-funded securitizations performed as planned, shrinking after years of growth with negligible consequences to earnings or equity. EBIT coverage improved due to lower interest rates and stable pricing.
Flat revenue but stable earnings. The COVID-19 pandemic caused many fleet management and leasing customers to pause new vehicle purchases and extend the life of existing vehicles. Although revenue for our issuers was mostly flat, earnings were largely intact and, for some issuers, grew. Balance sheet assets, which are mostly leasing assets, were flat or slightly shrank because of decreased lease demand.
Pause in favorable ABS pricing despite stellar credit performance. Overall ABS issuance slowed in April to June as pricing widened for all asset classes. We believe the temporary gap in favorable pricing and funding is illustrative of the risks of the industry's relative reliance on the securitization market. At the same time, however, the fleet management and leasing industry continued to report negligible credit losses on leased vehicles because of strong underwriting and open-end leases which shift residual value risk to customers.
What to look for over the next year
The outlooks on all of the entities we rate in the fleet leasing sector are stable.
Demand delayed or gone? In 2021, we are watching to see how new vehicle demand responds following a year when customers decided to hold off on new purchases and extend the life of existing fleet vehicles. Since most fleet vehicles tend to be critical to the business operations, we expect new fleet demand to perform modestly stronger than our GDP forecasts.
Chart 6
Money Exchange And Payment Services: Defensively Positioned For Good Reason
Key takeaways
- Given the shock to earnings money exchange and payment services companies faced in 2020, new lockdowns or restrictions on travel would undoubtedly stress results again. Payment services related to travel and fuel, and cross-border global remittances were most affected.
- However, the companies we rate are largely defensively positioned in case of further COVID-19 shelter-in-place orders. Many are taking proactive measures and raising liquidity to maintain or lower leverage.
- We therefore expect the impact of any potential future lockdowns would follow a similar pattern to what we witnessed in the second quarter of 2020. The shocks to earnings during the height of the pandemic were largely episodic and dissipated when economic activity resumed in the third quarter, supporting our view that the fundamental business models are largely intact.
- Companies: Euronet Worldwide, Fleetcor Technologies, Moneygram International, Western Union, and Wex Inc.
Key credit drivers
Higher cash balances lower net debt. Many of the companies we rate were able to build surplus cash during the stress because of less working capital needs and curbs to stock buybacks, which lowered net debt figures.
Revenue diversity and cost controls mitigate stress. Although operating results were challenged in the industry, revenue diversity, cost cutting, and variable expenses led to better-than-expected results, all else equal.
What to look for over the next year
Further lockdowns and economic activity. We view the money exchange and payment services industry as highly correlated to travel and economic activity. Although many of the companies we rate have taken proactive measures, a protracted pandemic will invariably erode such defensive measures. We will be particularly interested in the GDP trends of the U.S. and European markets, where issuers are most exposed. The World Bank expects global consumer-to-consumer remittances to fall to $619 billion in 2021 from $666 billion in 2020 and $714 billion in 2019.
Opportunistic mergers and acquisitions. We think issuers with stronger balance sheets and greater earnings visibility could consider opportunistic acquisitions of weaker operators. Larger acquisitions could lead to negative rating or outlook actions.
Regulation and law. We are watching a handful of legal challenges in 2021 whose outcomes could affect leverage. As part of Moneygram's deferred prosecution agreement (DPA), the company has an independent compliance monitor in place until May 2021, which could be extended if the Department of Justice believes lapses in internal controls have not been properly remediated. Western Union's DPA was formally dismissed in March 2019. The Federal Trade Commission's lawsuit against Fleetcor alleging it charged customers at least hundreds of millions of dollars in hidden fees is also ongoing.
Chart 7
Chart 8
Consumer Lending: Modest Growth In Origination Volume For Personal Loans And Potential Rise In Delinquencies
Key takeaways
- Modest economic growth in 2021 and termination of temporary relief programs provided through CARES Act provisions and deferments by lenders could lead to a rise in delinquencies. We expect lenders to maintain adequate reserves for potential loan losses.
- We expect origination volume growth for 2021 as the economy slowly rebounds, stimulus benefit fades in the second half, and consumers adapt to the new normal due to availability of COVID-19 vaccines.
- The new administration could impose regulatory hurdles for consumer finance companies, specifically payday lenders by capping interest rate charged.
- Companies: CCF Holdings, CNG Holdings, Curo Group Holdings, Enova International, Fairstone Financial, FirstCash Inc., goeasy Ltd., Greensky Holdings, OneMain Holdings, TMX Finance, and World Acceptance.
Key credit drivers
The economic rebound. The coronavirus pandemic led to deterioration in economic conditions in the U.S. S&P Global economists expect U.S. GDP to modestly grow by 4.2% in 2021 after contracting 3.9% in 2020. We think the contraction in GDP will have an exacerbated effect on lower-income workers who are more likely to use consumer lending products.
Trend in delinquencies and charge-offs. With the expiration of CARES Act provisions and voluntary payment deferment programs offered by lenders, we could see delinquencies and net charge-offs rise in 2021. We expect consumer finance companies have already made adequate provisions for potential credit losses.
Liquidity. At the onset of the pandemic, we saw companies draw on their credit facilities to maintain adequate liquidity for ongoing operations. We expect most consumer finance companies will not face liquidity issues since they can scale back originations and draw on their credit facilities, if needed.
Key assumptions
Lower unemployment and higher demand. S&P Global economists expect the unemployment rate to decline to 6.4% in 2021 from 8.3% in 2020. Also, we expect consumer demand for loans to rise modestly as additional liquidity from stimulus dwindles in the second half of 2021.
Economic growth. S&P Global economists expect real GDP to grow 4.2% in 2021 after a 3.9% decline for 2020. We expect the recovery will be slower for economic cohorts that rely on less steady sources of income, which could boost demand for consumer lending products.
Access to markets. With increased investor appetite and the Fed's plan to keep interest rates low until 2023, companies are likely to have continued access to capital markets.
What to look for over the next year
New administration could lead to new regulatory hurdle. The Biden Administration could make regulatory changes, which could affect the lending strategies of consumer financing companies--specifically payday lenders that charge a triple-digit annual percentage rate (APR). In 2020, Nebraska and Virginia capped personal loan interest at 36% APR plus fees, following California's similar rule passed in 2019. We could see some federal regulations or other states pass similar initiatives.
Trends in charge-offs and delinquencies. While we expect lenders to gradually increase originations in 2021, we remain cautious about a potential rise in charge-offs and delinquencies as government stimulus and temporarily forbearance programs end.
Potential shift in portfolio mix. As the economy slowly recovers, we expect lenders to remain selective in originations by shifting their portfolio mix either toward less risky customers or more secured lending. According to TransUnion, for third-quarter 2020, total unsecured balance decreased to $151 billion from $156 billion in third-quarter 2019, and loans 60+ days delinquent declined to 2.53% from 3.28%.
Debt repurchases. Reduced originations and rise in repayments led to higher-than-normal cash on balance sheet. The companies used excess cash to make dividend payments or debt repurchases, often at prices significantly below par. If a company repurchases debt at distressed levels, we typically view it as a de facto restructuring that is tantamount to a default.
Chart 9
Chart 10
BDCs And Leveraged Lending: Obstacles Remain
Key takeaways
- Defaults and restructurings in leveraged loan portfolios are likely to continue as the effects of the pandemic ease.
- We expect elevated loans on nonaccrual status and realized losses to be earnings headwinds.
- Asset quality, earnings, leverage, and liquidity will be key factors to watch for business development companies (BDCs) and other leveraged finance lenders.
- Companies: Ares Capital, FS Energy and Power Fund, Golub Capital BDC, Jefferies Finance, KKR Financial Holdings, Main Street Capital, Owl Rock Capital Corp., Owl Rock Capital Corp. II, Oxford Finance, Prospect Capital, and Sixth Street Specialty Lending.
Key credit drivers
The strength of the economy. Credit losses generally spike during and immediately following recessions. Leveraged loan performance is closely linked to the economic cycle, and asset quality is a key determinant of credit quality for BDCs and other leveraged loan providers.
Competition and underwriting standards. The competitive environment influences underwriting standards, which, in turn, drive asset quality. The demand for private credit investments and the emergence of direct lending as an asset class is a secular trend that has intensified competition, in our view. We believe lenders have temporarily adopted a more defensive posture.
Financing conditions. Financing conditions influence the ability of wholesale funded nonbank financial institutions to obtain funding for growth and refinance maturing borrowings and credit facilities, as well as the cost and terms of funding. Also, weakening financing conditions may stress liquidity needed for unfunded commitments, such as undrawn revolvers and underwriting commitments.
Interest rates. Low interest rates aid borrowers' ability to service their debt, reducing the probability of default. Also, to the extent that lenders incorporate floors on floating-rate loans, declining rates can enhance net interest margins for lenders.
Key assumptions
The economy slowly recovers and GDP returns to precrisis levels in the third quarter of 2021. We currently forecast real GDP to grow 4.2% in 2021 after a 3.9% in decline for 2020, with a 25%-30% risk of recession. S&P Global Ratings Research forecasts that the U.S. trailing-12-month speculative-grade corporate default rate will increase to 9.0% by September 2021 compared with 6.3% as of September 2020.
The Fed Funds rate remains near zero. We expect the Fed to hold the fed funds policy target rate near zero for the next three years.
Access to markets. As the economy slowly recovers and with interest rates expected to remain low, we could see companies accessing the unsecured and secured markets to lower their cost of funding and push out their debt maturities, as seen with a couple of our rated BDCs in early 2021.
What to look for over the next year
Asset quality. Even as the economy slowly recovers, the trailing default rate may rise, but losses may vary among issuers depending on industry exposures, underwriting quality, and concentrations. Loans on nonaccrual status and payment-in-kind (PIK) income are expected to be higher at the start of the year before normalizing as the economic recovery gains traction.
Earnings. We expect elevated loans on nonaccrual status and realized losses in the wake of the pandemic. These factors, along with elevated PIK income, could weigh on key earnings metrics for BDCs that we rate, including non-deal-dependent income coverage of interest and dividends, and realized return on portfolio investments.
Leverage. We will monitor the extent to which lenders potentially increase leverage in 2021, with 1.0x debt to adjusted total equity (ATE) being a key threshold, particularly for BDCs.
Liquidity. While we do not anticipate the calls on liquidity that many experienced in the spring of 2020 to meet unfunded commitments, we will continue to monitor how companies manage potential liquidity needs for unfunded revolvers and underwriting commitments.
Chart 11
Chart 12
CRE Finance Companies: Full Impact From The Pandemic Remains Unknown
Key takeaways
- We believe CRE valuations, which are typically slow to adjust, have yet to fully reflect the impact of the pandemic.
- While the retail and hospitality sectors were among the first to be affected by the pandemic, long-term risks weigh on the office and multifamily sectors. The imposition of new global lockdowns could present significant short-term difficulties, especially if vaccine distribution is slower than expected.
- Financing conditions have been largely supportive thus far with debt issuances in the public market, while some CRE lenders received margin call holidays from their bank lenders.
- Companies: Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance Inc., Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Claros Mortgage Trust, iStar Inc., KKR Real Estate Finance Trust, Ladder Capital Finance Holdings, LoanCore Capital Markets LLC, and Starwood Property Trust Inc.
Key credit drivers
The strength of the economy. CRE is cyclical and closely linked to the health of the economy, and asset quality is a key determinant of credit quality for CRE finance companies. If the vaccine rollout is slow, or the extraordinary fiscal stimulus we saw in 2020 abates, we would expect significant downside risks to our current base-case expectations.
Financing conditions. Financing conditions have been largely supportive thus far with secured and unsecured issuance in the public market. However, most of the rated CRE finance companies utilize secured repurchase facilities, which come with significant margin call risk. While companies can negotiate different terms with their bank lenders, most saw margin calls on CRE securities (spread-mark exposure) and were able to either pay down debt or negotiate a margin call holiday on affected transitional loans (credit-mark exposure).
Interest rates. We think the Federal Reserve is unlikely to raise its benchmark interest rates anytime soon. We look for the accommodative stance from the Fed to remain as it has guided toward a higher tolerance for inflation.
Key assumptions
Slow economic recovery in 2021. Our economists currently expect 4.2% real GDP growth in 2021 and estimate the risk of recession in the next 12 months at 25%-30%.
Interest rates remain low in 2021. We expect the Fed to remain supportive and committed to low interest rates through 2021. The Fed's guidance toward a higher tolerance for inflation leads us to assume it would likely hold off raising rates until mid-2024.
What to look for over the next year
The outlooks on all of the entities we rate in the commercial real estate sector are negative.
Quality of loan portfolios. Many CRE lenders saw increases in provisions for credit losses in 2020. Much of the impact has been limited to the hotel and retail sectors. Many CRE lenders worked with property sponsors to inject capital or modify loan payments to aid during these difficult times, which we view as critical given the transitional nature of the loans. Severe risks and uncertainties remain as the pandemic continues.
Long-term CRE impact. The multifamily and office sectors could show longer-term stress if working from home and related population shift away from larger cities remains even after the pandemic is largely subdued. We have already seen a significant decline in multifamily rents in cities such as New York and San Francisco, while office properties typically have longer leases and are likely to see stresses emerge slowly.
Financing conditions. CRE lenders took advantage of supportive financing conditions in 2020 to increase much needed liquidity should margin call risk materialize in 2021. Many lenders paid down debt or negotiated margin call holidays, mostly on troubled retail and hotel loans backed by repo facilities. We have not yet seen many of these margin-call holidays expire, and currently the focus has largely been on hotel and retail property loans. Over the next year it will be critical to watch CRE lenders' exposure to margin calls and their ability to access the public markets for liquidity.
Chart 13
CRE Services: Potential Headwinds Persist As Companies Reconsider Office Space Requirements
Key takeaways
- Despite the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, we expect fairly modest economic growth in 2021, limiting improvement in office leasing volumes and overall cash volumes for CRE service companies.
- Reconsideration of office space requirements by companies will also affect leasing, a segment that makes up about one-third of fee revenues for rated CRE service companies in aggregate.
- We also expect property transaction volumes to remain relatively weak, hurting capital markets revenues, though this could start turning around in the seasonally important second half of the year.
- CRE service companies will likely look to use in-fill acquisitions, technology enhancements, and expense management to support operating performance.
- Companies: Avison Young (Canada) Inc., CBRE Services Inc., Cushman & Wakefield, Greystar Real Estate Partners, Greystone Select, Jones Lang LaSalle Inc., Newmark Group, and Walker & Dunlop.
Key credit drivers
Revenue growth. We expect about 30%-40% of fee revenues from recurring sources such as property and facilities management, 30%-35% from leasing, and 20%-25% from capital markets for our rated issuers. The latter two segments were severely hurt by COVID-19 throughout 2020.
Leverage management. Despite double-digit declines in EBITDA in 2020, we expect leverage to largely remain within our thresholds for the current ratings as companies use excess cash to reduce debt. Several companies have targets to keep their net debt to EBITDA below 2.0x, a level we view favorably. Some companies have had more trouble staying within our expected ranges, which is reflected in their lower relative ratings.
Capital deployment. While the companies have access to institutional capital and capital markets, we expect investors will likely remain on the sidelines until there is more visibility on the new normal and the widespread availability of vaccines.
Key assumptions
Revenue growth to be driven by recurring fee stream in 2021. We expect CRE service companies to focus on growing their recurring fee revenue streams of property and facilities management. Despite the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, we expect transactional volume from leasing and capital markets to remain modest, which will lead to volatility in fee revenues from these segments.
Evolving fundamentals in 2021. Our economists expect the U.S. economy to rebound by 4.2% in 2021 and interest rates to remain low, and we expect companies to have access to institutional capital, but fundamentals to change as companies reconsider their office space requirements.
Stable multifamily origination volume. According to the MBA, there is about $115 billion in multifamily maturities by 2022. The MBA forecasts multifamily origination volume will gradually rise from $288 billion in 2020 to $320 billion in 2022.
What to look for over the next year
Reassessment of office space requirements. CRE service companies will have to adapt to companies' likely transition to a hybrid model and reduced office space requirements. This will lead to a decline in transactional volume and fee revenues generated from office leasing long term. We expect the decline in office leasing to be partially offset by industrial and warehouse leasing.
Potential industry consolidation. We expect bigger, well-positioned companies with adequate liquidity could be acquisitive, which creates the possibility of incremental leverage and execution risk.
Forbearance trends. The Federal Housing Finance Agency has extended the forbearance option for multifamily mortgages backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to March 31, 2021. We expect servicers to maintain adequate funding facilities for these requests and liquidity to remain steady.
Chart 14
Chart 15
Appendix: Rating Component Scores
Table 1
Financial Services Finance Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Business risk profile | Financial risk profile | Anchor | Diversification | Capital structure | Financial policy | Liquidity | Management and governance | Peer adjustment | SACP | ICR | Outlook | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate services | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Avison Young (Canada) Inc. |
Fair | Highly Leveraged | b | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Negative | b- | B- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
CBRE Services Inc. |
Satisfactory | Modest | bbb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Exceptional | Satisfactory | Neutral | bbb+ | BBB+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Cushman & Wakefield |
Fair | Aggressive | bb- | Neutral | Neutral | FS-5 | Strong | Fair | Neutral | bb- | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Greystar Real Estate Partners, LLC |
Fair | Aggressive | bb- | Neutral | Neutral | Negative | Adequate | Satisfactory | Neutral | b+ | B+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
GreyStone Select Financial LLC |
Weak | Highly Leveraged | b- | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b- | B- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Jones Lang LaSalle Inc. |
Satisfactory | Modest | bbb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Exceptional | Satisfactory | Neutral | bbb+ | BBB+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Newmark Group, Inc. |
Fair | Modest | bbb- | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Strong | Fair | Negative | bb+ | BB+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Walker & Dunlop Inc |
Fair | Modest | bbb- | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Strong | Satisfactory | Negative | bb | BB | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Fleet leasing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element Fleet Management Corp. |
Satisfactory | Intermediate | bbb | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | bbb | BBB | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Enterprise Fleet Management Inc. |
Satisfactory | Modest | bbb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Satisfactory | Neutral | bbb+ | BBB+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Wheels Inc. |
Satisfactory | Intermediate | bbb | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Satisfactory | Positive | bbb+ | BBB+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Altisource Portfolio Solutions S.A. |
Vulnerable | Highly Leveraged | b- | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Weak | Neutral | b- | B- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Freedom Mortgage Corp. |
Weak | Highly Leveraged | b | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b- | B- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
LD Holdings Group LLC |
Weak | Aggressive | b+ | Neutral | Negative | FS-5 | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b | B | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Mr. Cooper Group Inc. |
Weak | Aggressive | b+ | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b | B | Stable | ||||||||||||||
OCWEN Financial Corp. |
Vulnerable | Highly Leveraged | b- | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Weak | Neutral | b- | B- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
PennyMac Financial Services, Inc. |
Weak | Significant | bb- | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b+ | B+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Provident Funding Associates L.P. |
Weak | Aggressive | b+ | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Negative | b- | B- | Positive | ||||||||||||||
Quicken Loans Inc. |
Fair | Intermediate | bb+ | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Strong | Fair | Neutral | bb | BB | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Consumer lending and payday | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CCF Holdings LLC |
Vulnerable | Highly Leveraged | b- | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b- | CCC | Negative | ||||||||||||||
CNG Holdings Inc. |
Vulnerable | Significant | b+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Negative | b | B | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Curo Group Holdings Corp. |
Vulnerable | Highly Leveraged | b- | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b- | B- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Enova International, Inc. |
Vulnerable | Aggressive | b | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b | B | Negative | ||||||||||||||
FirstCash, Inc. |
Weak | Intermediate | bb | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Strong | Satisfactory | Neutral | bb | BB | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Greensky Holdings |
Vulnerable | Significant | b+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b+ | B+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
TMX Finance LLC |
Vulnerable | Aggressive | b | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Weak | Neutral | b- | B- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Student lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nelnet Inc. |
Fair | Minimal | bbb | Neutral | Negative | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | bbb- | BBB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Money exchange | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Euronet Worldwide Inc. |
Satisfactory | Modest | bbb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Strong | Fair | Negative | bbb | BBB | Negative | ||||||||||||||
FleetCor Technologies Inc. |
Satisfactory | Intermediate | bbb- | Neutral | Neutral | Negative | Adequate | Fair | Neutral | bb+ | BB+ | Positive | ||||||||||||||
MoneyGram International |
Weak | Highly Leveraged | b | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Less than Adequate | Fair | Neutral | b | B | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Western Union Co. (The) |
Satisfactory | Intermediate | bbb | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Exceptional | Fair | Neutral | bbb | BBB | Stable | ||||||||||||||
WEX Inc. |
Satisfactory | Highly Leveraged | b+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Positive | bb- | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Specialty finance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Blucora Inc. |
Fair | Intermediate | bb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Negative | bb | BB | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Greenhill & Co., Inc. |
Fair | Intermediate | bb+ | Neutral | Neutral | Neutral | Adequate | Fair | Negative | bb | BB | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Note: As of Jan. 15, 2021. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. ICR--Issuer credit rating. |
Table 2
NBFI Finance Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Anchor | Entity-specific adjustment | Final anchor | Business position | Capital, leverage, and earnings | Risk position | Funding/liquidity | Comparable ratings adjustment | SACP | Group/GRE support | ICR | Outlook | ||||||||||||||
Auto lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Acceptance Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | bb | 0 | BB | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Commercial lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jefferies Finance LLC |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Weak | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | b+ | 1 | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
KKR Financial Holdings LLC |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Very strong | Very Weak | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 4 | BBB | Watch neg | ||||||||||||||
Oxford Finance LLC |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Commercial real estate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Apollo Commercial Real Estate Finance, Inc |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | -1 | b+ | 0 | B+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Blackstone Mortgage Trust Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | b+ | 0 | B+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Claros Mortgage Trust, Inc |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | -1 | b+ | 0 | B+ | Negative | ||||||||||||||
iStar Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 1 | bb | 0 | BB | Negative | ||||||||||||||
KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 1 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Ladder Capital Finance Holdings LLLP |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Adequate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
LoanCore Capital Markets LLC |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Weak | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 1 | b | 0 | B | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Starwood Property Trust Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Consumer lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fairstone Financial Inc. |
bbb- | 0 | bbb- | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | b+ | 0 | B+ | Watch dev | ||||||||||||||
goeasy Ltd. |
bbb- | 0 | bbb- | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
OneMain Holdings, Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Moderate | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
World Acceptance Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Weak | Moderate/Moderate | -1 | b- | 0 | B- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Student lending | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Navient Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Residential Investment Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Adequate | Moderate | Weak/Adequate | 0 | b | 0 | B | Negative | ||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Burford Capital Ltd. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Very Strong | Weak | Adequate/Moderate | 0 | bb- | 0 | BB- | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Moderate | Strong | Adequate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | bb+ | 0 | BB+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Massachusetts Development Finance Agency |
bb+ | 1 | bbb- | Strong | Very strong | Adequate | Strong/Strong | 0 | a | 1 | A+ | Stable | ||||||||||||||
National Rural Utilities Cooperative Finance |
bb+ | 1 | bbb- | Very strong | Adequate | Strong | Adequate/Adequate | 1 | a | 0 | A | Stable | ||||||||||||||
Note: As of Jan. 15, 2021. SACP--Stand-alone credit profile. GRE--Government-related entity. ICR--Issuer credit rating. |
Table 3
Business Development Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Company | Anchor | Entity-specific adjustment | Final anchor | Business position | Capital, leverage, and earnings | Risk position | Funding and liquidity | Comparable ratings adjustment | ICR | Outlook | ||||||||||||
ARES Capital Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Stable | ||||||||||||
FS Energy and Power Fund |
bb+ | 1 | bbb- | Weak | Very Strong | Very Weak | Moderate/Moderate | 0 | B | Stable | ||||||||||||
Golub Capital BDC Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Negative | ||||||||||||
Main Street Capital Corp. |
bb+ | 1 | bbb- | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | -1 | BBB- | Stable | ||||||||||||
Owl Rock Capital Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Stable | ||||||||||||
Owl Rock Capital Corp. II |
bb+ | 1 | bbb- | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Moderate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Stable | ||||||||||||
Prospect Capital Corp. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Negative | ||||||||||||
Sixth Street Specialty Lending Inc. |
bb+ | 0 | bb+ | Adequate | Very Strong | Moderate | Adequate/Adequate | 0 | BBB- | Stable | ||||||||||||
Note: As of Jan. 15, 2021. ICR--Issuer credit rating. |
This report does not constitute a rating action.
Primary Credit Analysts: | Stephen F Lynch, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 1494; stephen.lynch@spglobal.com |
Matthew T Carroll, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 3112; matthew.carroll@spglobal.com | |
Secondary Contacts: | Brendan Browne, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 7399; brendan.browne@spglobal.com |
Adam Grossbard, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 8283; adam.grossbard@spglobal.com | |
Diogenes Mejia, New York + 1 (212) 438 0145; diogenes.mejia@spglobal.com | |
Gaurav A Parikh, CFA, New York + 1 (212) 438 1131; gaurav.parikh@spglobal.com |
No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, valuations, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an “as is” basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT’S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages.
Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P’s opinions, analyses and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. Rating-related publications may be published for a variety of reasons that are not necessarily dependent on action by rating committees, including, but not limited to, the publication of a periodic update on a credit rating and related analyses.
To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw or suspend such acknowledgment at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof.
S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process.
S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.
Any Passwords/user IDs issued by S&P to users are single user-dedicated and may ONLY be used by the individual to whom they have been assigned. No sharing of passwords/user IDs and no simultaneous access via the same password/user ID is permitted. To reprint, translate, or use the data or information other than as provided herein, contact S&P Global Ratings, Client Services, 55 Water Street, New York, NY 10041; (1) 212-438-7280 or by e-mail to: research_request@spglobal.com.