IHS World Markets Energy Perspective | |
Significance | With the drilling of exploration wells falling to its lowest levels in 10 years, there is already evidence that the delay in passing the Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB) is causing investors to delay key offshore exploration operations. |
Implications | The PIB and local content requirements will be disincentives to further investment in offshore and deepwater projects. |
Outlook | Investment decisions and awarding of contracts will continue to be pushed back until clarity is gained over the implications of the PIB. |
Oil exploration in Nigeria has fallen to its lowest level in a decade as the country's major producers, including Royal Dutch Shell and Total, have been withholding investment pending the imminent passage of the disputed Petroleum Industry Bill (PIB). Recent official figures from the Petroleum Ministry reported by Bloomberg indicate that just one exploration well was drilled in Nigeria in the past two years—the lowest figure since 1999, with the number of exploration wells peaking at 34 wells in 2002. Belema Osibodu, spokeswoman for the Department of Petroleum Resources, blamed declining exploration efforts on a lack of funds available for exploration as IOCs have temporarily halted new projects while waiting for the PIB to be passed.
The PIB will bring sweeping reform to the Nigerian energy industry. The bill will significantly raise government take by introducing a hydrocarbon tax, amongst others, that could render particularly deepwater projects economically unviable. This is in fact the crux of the IOCs' opposition to the PIB, as oil companies fear that the PIB will increase their tax liabilities and alter the economics of existing and new projects. This is a particular concern to large IOCs since most of their new production is scheduled to come from deepwater areas, in part a result of the rising insecurity onshore that has already seen Shell sell some of its onshore blocks. Shell, the major IOC operating in Nigeria, warned last year that almost USD40 billion of planned investments are at stake if the PIB is approved in its current form. It appears that there are several versions of the PIB in front of the Senate, and despite constant promises from government officials that the bill will be passed "soon", the delay has been causing IOCs to withhold some USD120 billion in oil and gas investment (see Nigeria: 3 February 2011: Petroleum Industry Bill Will Be Legislated Before May, Says Nigerian President). The Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has noted that every month that the PIB's passing is delayed, Nigeria is losing additional revenue of USD287 million in accruals from the NNPC's joint ventures with ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron and Eni (see Nigeria: 4 January 2011: Further Uncertainty over Nigeria's Petroleum Industry Bill As Presidential Election Nears).
Exploration and Pipeline Damage, 2000–09 | ||||
Year | Exploration Wells | Seismic Acquisition (sq. km) | Pipeline Vandalisation | Pipeline Rupture |
2009 | 6 | 4,560 | 1,453 | 27 |
2008 | 6 | 10,212 | 2,285 | 33 |
2007 | 14 | 5,200 | 3,224 | 20 |
2006 | 19 | 10,622 | 3,674 | 9 |
2005 | 9 | 1,419 | 2,237 | 21 |
2004 | 11 | 7,010 | 895 | 76 |
2003 | 8 | N/A | 779 | 48 |
2002 | 34 | 4,394 | 516 | 26 |
2001 | 15 | N/A | 461 | 26 |
2000 | 9 | N/A | 984 | 137 |
Source: Nigerian National Petroleum Company (NNPC) Annual Statistical Bulletins 2000-09 |
In addition to the impact of the PIB on deferred investment, armed attacks on oil installations have cut more than 28% of the country's oil output between 2006 and 2009, according to Bloomberg data. Militant groups, in particular the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) often sabotage oil pipelines, and this has also been deterring new investment. The table above indicates the number of wells drilled, the square kilometres covered by seismic data acquisition, as well as the number of incidences of pipeline vandalisation and rupture over a period of 10 years (2000–09). When the number of incidences of pipeline vandalisation and rupture spiked from 2006 onwards, the number of exploration wells decreased, while the areas covered by seismic data acquisition halved twice after first increasing the previous year.
Impact on Production
Several outstanding oil and gas projects have since been deferred until 2014 or postponed indefinitely on account of the uncertainty over the prevailing fiscal terms. Projects affected by the non-passage of the PIB include Shell's Bonga SW, Bonga NW, Total's Egina, ExxonMobil's Bosi, and Chevron's Nsiko developments. Shell's Bonga SW development was delayed indefinitely in 2009 in order to secure stakeholders' agreement on the scope and commercial terms of the project, according to a Chevron statement. In reality, the debilitating fiscal terms of the PIB have been causing a rethink of the project, and a final investment decision (FID) has been imminent since 2010. Field development planning and subsurface evaluations were completed in 2008 and front-end engineering and design (FEED) are expected to begin once commercial terms are resolved. Total's Egina project has also been delayed because of tough local content provisions. Invitations to tender for the large floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels were released last year in July, six months behind schedule, to several South Korean, European, and Chinese bidders. Nigeria's local content law, signed into law last year in April, stipulates that a significant amount of the fabrication of the vessels' topsides must be carried out in the country. Nigerian shipyards, however, are not able to construct an FPSO's 34,000-tonne deck owing to a lack of capacity and capabilities. In order to meet these local content requirements, the bidders now need to upgrade Nigerian facilities, which will increase the cost by around USD200 million. First oil production was originally scheduled for end-2012 but has now been pushed back to 2015.
Projects Affected by Lack of PIB | ||||
Project | Operator | Operating Interest | Potential Poduction ('000 boe) | Start-Up Year (estimated) |
Bonga NW | Shell | 55 | 43 | 2014+ |
Bonga North | Shell | 55 | 95 | 2014+ |
Bonga SW | Shell | 55 | 110 | 2014+ |
Bosi | ExxonMobil | 56 | 135 | 2013+ |
Nsiko | Chevron | 95 | ^ | N/A |
Egina | Total | 24 | 200 | 2015(e) |
Total | 583 | |||
^ Chevron has not declared how much will be produced Source: Company reports 2009–10 |
Outlook and Implications
As Nigeria prepares for presidential elections, it now seems even more unlikely that the PIB will be passed during President Goodluck Jonathan's current tenure. With Shell selling some 34 onshore blocks on account of the challenging operational conditions—and partly a result of the oilfields nearing maturity—the importance of additional deepwater developments in ensuring continuous oil production in Nigeria becomes clear. While the country's deepwater developments have strong potential to expand thanks to high prospectivity, the fiscal terms potentially imposed by the PIB will threaten the development of Nigeria's oil industry. The PIB is likely to remove some of the incentives for developing the Nigerian offshore, and by significantly raising government take, large projects will cease to hold their attraction in the eyes of investors. Uncertainty over when the PIB will be passed, as well as the form it will take, will continue to push back investment decisions, and some projects could even be cancelled until the financial terms have been clarified (see Nigeria: 18 February 2011: West African Deepwater Piques IOC Interest Again with Promising New Fields).