Learn how a sector-specific model can improve your investment choices

Quantify Country Risk in Financial Terms To Inform More Profitable Investment Decisions – by Sector and Project Type

Accurate investment and project-specific evaluations of risk, that considers country, sector, and project-type, can unearth investment opportunities that, on first assessment, appear too risky. Our Country Risk Investment Model forecasts and measures the expected financial impact different types of risk will have on cash flows and investment returns. Utilizing our country expertise, sector analysis, and granular risk scores allows you to accurately forecast, quantify, and compare the financial viability of new investments and existing business activities.

Investors, corporate finance & strategy teams, risk management groups, insurers, and project and business development groups use our Country Risk Investment Model to:

  • Quantify country risks, in financial terms, generating specific Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) to test potential investments against changing risk scenarios
  • Compare and evaluate different potential investments and projects within a country, across a region, or around the world
  • Assess the value of political risk insurance based on the location and sector of an asset
  • Identify the risks that are impact future cash flows and target risk mitigation strategies to improve the long-term profitability of investments
  • Monitor and assess evolving country risks overtime to optimize investment strategies and inform the timing of potential exit strategies.
CRIM

Our Advantage

Current proxies for country risk, like commonly used sovereign risk indicators, reflect a limited view of commercially relevant risks and don’t account for the significant impact different sectoral risk profiles can have on profitability. Our model integrates the full spectrum of commercially relevant political, economic, legal, tax, operational, and security risks and models their impact on future cash flows by sector, and by project phase. This results in a more accurate and actionable forecast of future cash flows allowing you to precisely value and compare potential investments in a single country, across a region, and around the world.

GettyImages-872179014

Solutions

Research & Analysis

Blog

May 14, 2025

Weekly Pricing Pulse: Commodity Prices See Third Consecutive Weekly Fall

BLOG — May 14, 2025 Weekly Pricing Pulse: Commodity Prices See Third Consecutive Weekly Fall Markets were steady last week as the Fed held interest rates unchanged, in line with expectations, and flagged rising risks to both inflation and employment from newly announced tariffs. A partial trade deal with the UK preserved the 10% universal tariff but eased Section 232 duties on steel, aluminum, and autos in exchange for UK tariff cuts on US goods, offering little inflation relief given the UK’s small trade share. Economic data was negative, showing a wider trade deficit, a dip in productivity, and higher unit labor costs, leading us to trim our Q2 GDP forecast. Meanwhile, the Bank of England met last week and lowered interest rates to 4.25% from 4.5%, citing heightened global trade tensions as a key driver for reduced borrowing costs. Next week’s US data regarding CPI/PPI, industrial production, and housing starts will further inform how tariffs are filtering through prices and demand for commodities. Learn more about our insights and data The Material Price Index (MPI) by S&P Global Market Intelligence declined by 0.9% last week, following a 1.7% decline the week before, a third consecutive weekly fall. The decline was mixed, with half of the ten subcomponents falling. The MPI is approximately 13.5% lower than it was the same week a year ago, indicating a general easing in commodity prices over the past 12 months. Ferrous metal markets were a key downward mover for the aggregate MPI, with the sub-index falling by 1.8% last week. Weekly average iron ore spot prices fell by 1.7% to $98.4 / metric ton from $99.5 / metric ton the previous week, the lowest level since the start of the year. The drop was driven by confirmation from the China Iron and Steel Association that output curbs are actively underway to restore mill profitability. This weighed on sentiment and dampened expectations for iron ore demand. In contrast, rubber prices showed strength last week, with the sub-index increasing 1.7%. Natural rubber prices on the Singapore Exchange rose to 214.9 cents per kilogram from 211.2 cents per kilogram the previous week, supported by renewed speculative buying. Optimism over US-China tariff negotiations helped lift sentiment, while the wave of monetary easing in mainland China — including a 10-basis point rate cut, a 0.5 percentage point reduction in the Reserve Requirement Ratio, and lower mortgage rates — boosted expectations for domestic demand and added upward pressure on prices. — By Philip Azar Sign up for our Supply Chain Essentials newsletter This article was published by S&P Global Market Intelligence and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global. Power plays Key economic, geopolitical and supply chain drivers for 2025 Request Full Report Insights and analysis to empower confident decisions The Decisive podcast is here to provide you with the knowledge you need to stay ahead. Listen now

Request Follow Up

Complete the form to learn more about the Country Risk Investment Model. 

Clicking 'Submit' means you agree to the Terms(opens in a new tab) and have read and understand the Privacy Policy(opens in a new tab).