S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Language
Featured Products
Ratings & Benchmarks
By Topic
Market Insights
About S&P Global
Corporate Responsibility
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
Featured Products
Ratings & Benchmarks
By Topic
Market Insights
About S&P Global
Corporate Responsibility
Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
Gas can contribute to the energy transition by delivering fast and deep decarbonization.
Published: March 13, 2024
Highlights
Natural gas can provide significant near-term emissions reductions through fuel substitution.
Low-carbon gases can further reduce emissions in the longer term.
The issues of methane leakage and infrastructure “lock-in” must be addressed if these benefits are to be realized.
Gas in its various forms needs to be part of the environmental policy toolkit. The immediate push of natural gas can help achieve fast decarbonization by accelerating the phaseout of coal with a proven alternative technology. A focus on developing low-carbon gases can achieve deep decarbonization, providing a further cut in emissions and a pathway to net-zero.
Natural gas plays a central role in the global economy. Approximately one-fifth of the world’s energy used today comes from natural gas. Its applications are widespread and integral to our everyday lives: heating homes, shopping malls and offices; fueling paper and steel mills; powering glass, food and metal factories; providing feedstock for fertilizer plants; and generating electricity — the list goes on. The importance of natural gas came to public attention in 2022 with the cut in pipeline gas supplies from Russia to Europe. This triggered rocketing prices for electricity and fertilizers, creating a global scramble for LNG and, ultimately, leading to power outages in countries as far apart as Pakistan and Myanmar.
What role should natural gas play in the energy transition? The UN's annual climate change conference (COP28), held in the United Arab Emirates in 2023, concluded with a call to “transition away from fossil fuels.” But not all fossil fuels are born equal. Any concerted action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions is likely to mean efforts to reduce oil and coal consumption as soon and as much as reasonably possible. For natural gas — the fossil fuel with the lowest GHG footprint — the arguments are more complex. The option exists to transition away from either coal or oil toward natural gas. This brings quick and significant near-term benefits in reduced emissions but does not reach the desired goal of net-zero. As a result, the adoption of natural gas often sets idealists against pragmatists.
There are six ways that natural gas can help push forward sustainability and decarbonization. Each can occur over different time frames, with varying impacts (see chart).
Coal-to-gas substitution is the biggest near-term opportunity. Coal is responsible for 43% of global energy-related GHG emissions. China alone accounts for half of global steam coal used to generate power and in industrial processes worldwide. India and the US are the other biggest markets for coal generation, and many developing countries continue to add coal-fired capacity. Replacing older and less efficient coal plants with best-in-class natural gas generation should reduce emissions by more than 50% per unit of electricity.
The production of ammonia and methanol provides another opportunity to replace coal with natural gas. Ammonia is a key input in the production of many fertilizers and can also be co-fired with coal in power stations to reduce overall coal burn. Most of the ammonia and methanol produced comes from natural gas, but coal is also used, primarily in China. In the steel sector, metallurgical coal could be substituted by natural gas using direct reduced iron technology.
Renewable power is critical to the energy transition, and variable sources such as wind and solar are expected to be the primary technologies. Because they are variable, they need support. Improvements in battery technology and demand-side management can go a long way to meet short-term fluctuations. However, thermal generation will most likely be required to help renewable power manage long-duration storage needs. Today’s planning horizon, which will determine energy infrastructure for the coming decade, contains few alternatives, and gas-fired power is the principal option. Every unit increase in renewable power is likely to be accompanied by some form of dispatchable generation. This support is sometimes called a backup to renewables, but that term can be misleading since the backup often provides more power than the primary source.
There is also scope for natural gas to replace oil. The main opportunity in stationary facilities is the 1.6 million barrels per day of oil used to generate power in the Middle East. Another critical area is the rollout of electric vehicles. Although the vision is to power EVs with low-carbon sources of generation, in practice, natural gas will be needed at least at the margin as electricity demand booms. Using gas-fired power to help meet power demand from EVs is a form of oil-to-gas substitution. Moreover, an electric motor is typically more energy efficient than an internal combustion engine. Natural gas could also have an important role to play in medium- or heavy-duty vehicles and shipping, either in the form of compressed natural gas or as methanol or ammonia.
Carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) is a long-standing, proven technology with the potential to remove 90%-95% of emissions if properly operated. Its application to date has been mainly in oil and gas production, linked to enhanced oil recovery or gas processing associated with LNG facilities. In future, CCUS will need to be deployed at a much greater scale downstream in industrial clusters or hubs. The principal applications of CCUS will be in “hard-to-decarbonize” factories, such as those processing steel, cement, glass and fertilizer. These sectors typically use natural gas.
S&P Global Commodity Insights projects that carbon capture will increase to 1.5 gigatons-6 gigatons per year by 2050, over 30 times higher than used today.
Hydrogen — or one of its derivatives, such as ammonia — is now widely recognized as a key component of decarbonization. More than 20 countries have declared hydrogen strategies. Some net-zero projections show hydrogen accounting for as much as 25% of energy end-use by 2050. So-called green hydrogen generated from renewable power via electrolysis will also feature. Given limitations in developing sufficient renewable capacity to meet both strongly growing direct power demand and a new appetite for hydrogen, blue hydrogen produced using natural gas is expected to play a significant role.
Sustainability is about more than GHG emissions. Air quality is a major health hazard, especially with growing levels of urbanization across the developing world. Natural gas has a strong card to play here. Its low levels of nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and particulates mean that wider gas use can help reduce pollution levels. The running of municipal buses, delivery vans and possibly taxis could improve air quality.
While gas can help support decarbonization, two potential spoilers must be addressed to ensure its benefits are reaped.
The first is methane leakage. Methane is a potent GHG emission. Although natural gas has a relatively low carbon footprint, this advantage could potentially be offset by high levels of associated methane slip, which may occur in production or delivery of the fuel. Approximately 10% to 12% of global anthropogenic methane emissions come from natural gas use. However, the promising news is that methane leakage is a problem with a solution. Technology is evolving fast in the areas of detection, measurement and mitigation, and lasers, drones and satellites are all part of the armory. The oil and gas industry is confident that it can harness these technologies, and a wide group of leading companies at COP28 endorsed a commitment to achieving near-zero methane emissions by 2030. Methane leakage has a disproportionately deleterious short-term impact compared with CO2, so reducing that leakage will have a magnified positive impact on near-term global warming. It will be critical for the natural gas industry not only to deliver on that commitment but also to demonstrate it at each stage of the supply chain. Risk and prevention protocols around methane leakage need to be analogous to those focused on preventing oil spills.
The second issue to address is the risk of infrastructure “lock-in.” This is the idea that investments today may enable emissions reductions from a base point but that these investments lock in a fixed level of emissions far into the future without options to reduce them further. The problem is that most natural gas investments have long asset lives. Pipelines that begin construction in 2024 can remain in operation beyond 2050, and liquefaction and regasification facilities operate for at least 25 years, often much longer. Switching from coal to gas offers an immediate but one-off cut in emissions, not a linear decline toward net-zero. The one-off emissions cut does, however, prevent CO2 from getting trapped in the atmosphere; for every unit of CO2 saved, hundreds of years of locked-in global warming effects are prevented (see chart).
There are two ways to circumvent infrastructure lock-in, and it is imperative the gas industry demonstrates the viability of both:
The industry can use existing infrastructure with a different fuel throughput. This might be renewable natural gas (biomethane), e.g., gas from landfills or manure, or synthetic natural gas. Hydrogen blending, within narrow ranges, can also reduce the carbon intensity associated with operating existing infrastructure.
It may be possible to repurpose existing infrastructure to run on low-carbon gas at a lower cost than building an alternative infrastructure system. For example, much work is underway to investigate how natural gas pipelines and storage facilities could be adapted to transport and store 100% hydrogen. Infrastructure might also be adapted to transport and sequester CO2. Repurposing assets would counter the risk of emissions lock-in and provide a clear technological pathway to transition from higher carbon, through lower carbon, to zero carbon. Repurposing turns the lock-in argument on its head: Investment in gas infrastructure becomes a pre-build and downpayment for a future decarbonized energy system.
Meeting the challenges of climate change is becoming ever more urgent. Gas can make a major positive contribution by leveraging existing energy infrastructure and an existing scaled supply chain. The immediate push of natural gas can help achieve fast decarbonization by accelerating the phaseout of coal with a proven alternative technology. A focus on developing low-carbon gases and making existing infrastructure suitable for conversion can achieve deep decarbonization in the longer term, providing a pathway to net-zero. A two-pronged approach that sees gas infrastructure working together with electrification needs to be part of our global environmental policy toolkit.
Next Article:
Permian methane: The good, the bad and the ugly
This article was authored by a cross-section of representatives from S&P Global and in certain circumstances external guest authors. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of any entities they represent and are not necessarily reflected in the products and services those entities offer. This research is a publication of S&P Global and does not comment on current or future credit ratings or credit rating methodologies.