S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
S&P Global Offerings
Featured Topics
Featured Products
Events
Solutions
Capabilities
Delivery Platforms
News & Research
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Featured Events
S&P Global
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
Research & Insights
S&P Global
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
About Commodity Insights
Solutions
Capabilities
Delivery Platforms
News & Research
Our Methodology
Methodology & Participation
Reference Tools
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Featured Events
S&P Global
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
S&P Global Offerings
S&P Global
Research & Insights
S&P Global
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
About Commodity Insights
Mar 14, 2023
By Daejin Lee
After returning to the pre-pandemic level, dry bulk freight rates may recover with mainland China's easing "zero-COVID" policy in the medium term and limited active supply in the long term, while container freight rates are expected to decline further with reduced congestion and heavy investment in new buildings.
Key findings
Dry bulk market
Since discussed in the last edition, over the last three months, our dry bulk freight forecasting models continued to show bearish view for early 2023 and bullish view for the second half of 2023 onward. Interestingly, we observed a volatile path to lower rates over the past few months in the absence of high congestion and slower-than-expected economic growth with continued weakness in mainland China's real estate sector. However, deferred contract of FFA, specifically, assessments for the second half of 2023 onward have been well-supported with mainland China's policy shifting toward supporting economic growth. As of writing (March 7, 2023), sentiments changed rapidly as many expect that major change in mainland China's "zero-COVID" policy would eventually improve the fundamental. We maintain our positive view in the medium term (first half 2023 onward) but remain cautious on very near term, mostly Q2 2023 for dry bulk market.
Container versus dry bulk
As we predicted, with weaker influence from the container sector to minor trade and backhaul rates of the smaller-geared bulker market, the historical earning spread of Panamax and Supramax returned to normal. Furthermore, with significant drop in container freight and slower container trade demand growth in response to high inflation rate and endemic consumer pattern along with reduced congestion, decontainerized trend has been reversed and large part of container spillover-related minor bulk cargo have already returned to container box.
However, dry bulk freight rates have also declined along with box rates, which may limit further containerization. Further downside risks on minor bulk demand remains toward the end of 2023 and 2024 as container sector is expected to face continued supply-side pressure with heavy investment in new buildings. Now, we assume container freight rates will continue to decline to pre-pandemic level.
Regulations and energy transition impact
With EEXI—design requirement for existing ships—many vessels go for engine power limitation (EPL). Maximum and operating speed are expected to be reduced; however, immediate impact will be limited as fleet speed has already slowed down with lower freight rates and higher bunker fuel prices.
CII rating is calculated as CO2 emitted per cargo-carrying capacity and nautical mile; this may increase ballasting voyage and reduce cargo intake. CII regulation will start to reduce sailing speed from 2024 and the impact may become significant in scrap activities from 2025 onward with favorable age profile. However, this also incentivizes higher demurrage to reduce idling time and congestion in the coming years.
Theoretically, EU ETS may cost shipping companies an additional €100-300 per 1 VLSFO metric ton based on an estimated CO2 price of € 60-100/metric ton of CO2, which could be passed on to customers through higher freight rates. The ETS will apply to 100% of emissions on voyages between European ports and 50% of emissions on inbound and outbound voyages. Shipping companies that do not comply with the ETS will be fined €100 for each EUA as penalties.
Although methanol (green) started to gain attention recently, mostly from container sector, gas has been the preferred choice for alternative fuel including dry bulk sector, while conventional LSFO-HSFO with scrubbers are still the dominant type for dry bulkers.
Outlook
In this context, S&P Global Freight Rate Forecast (FRF) models predict the Baltic Dry Index (BDI) to rebound from average 800 points in the first two months of 2023 to average about 1,400-1,600 points in 2023-24, while we assume container freight rates will continue to decline to average about $1,000-2,000 per box (FEU) in 2023-24 from an average of about $7,000 FEU in 2021-22, based on below assumptions.
This is part of S&P Global Commodity Insights Freight Rate Forecast(FRF) service and its quarterly freight outlook report (174p). If you are interested in the full report and subscription please contact daejin.lee@spglobal.com orphoebus.kaloudis@spglobal.com
This article was published by S&P Global Commodity Insights and not by S&P Global Ratings, which is a separately managed division of S&P Global.